|
EDC Monday PM |
Monday, May 25, 2015 |
7:00 PM–9:00 PM |
Exhibit Hall C (CC) |
|
57. Comparison of two modes of handwriting to decrease self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
RYAN FARMER (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Med), Patrick Romani (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Med), Amanda Zangrillo (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Abstract: Writing is a cornerstone of academic behavior, and thus academic success. For an 11-year-old child, handwriting via traditional pen and paper evoked high-risk self-injury maintained by negative reinforcement. The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate whether an alternative method for producing a written permanent product (i.e., an iPad touch-typing app) would result in higher item completion and lower rates of problem behavior. In order to mediate the potential risk of the assessment, a replacement behavior was taught as a rule and practiced prior to baseline; 95% of all problem behavior recorded matched the topography of the replacement behavior, thus mitigating the risk of the assessment. An ABAB reversal design in conjunction with a concurrent operant comparison of pen and paper versus iPad writing demonstrated the effectiveness of the iPad as a writing tool for the participant. Item completion rates were nearly 100% during all iPad sessions, while 100% of problem behavior recording during the course of the assessment occurred during handwriting via pen and paper sessions. Discussion will focus on use of the reversal and concurrent operants design as a viable method for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment components and school-based recommendations. |
|
|
58. The Effectiveness of Direct Instruction in Teaching Students with ASD to Answer "Wh-" Questions |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
JESSICA CADETTE (Florida Atlantic University) |
Abstract: Teachers of students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often struggle to find effective instructional methods to use with their students on a daily basis. The characteristic verbal, social, and behavioral limitations of children with ASD make finding effective teaching methods difficult. Though some intensive intervention methods, such as discrete trial teaching (DTT), have numerous studies demonstrating their effectiveness with students with ASD, the required one-on-one format makes it impractical to use in a classroom setting on a regular basis. Direct Instruction (DI) appears in the literature as a promising intervention for students with developmental disabilities. One benefit of DI is that, unlike DTT and similar interventions, it can be implemented in a group format. This group format provides a practical alternative for classroom teachers to use with their students with ASD. This study utilized a multiple probe across behaviors design to further investigate the use of DI to teach high school students with ASD how to answer “wh-” questions. The researcher used the SRA Reading Mastery language program, which is a DI program designed to develop language skills. Three high school students with ASD participated in instructional sessions four times a week for approximately 25 minutes each session. Data were collected on the each participant’s accuracy in answering “wh-” questions during baseline, acquisition (teaching), and maintenance conditions. The results indicate that DI was effective in helping participants acquire the language skills necessary to accurately respond to “what”, “where”, and “who” questions. |
|
|
59. Preference for and behavior during computer-based versus paper-pencil based activities in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
REBECCA BEIGHTS (Texas Tech University - Burkhart Center for Autism Education and Research), Jennifer K. Gilbert (Texas Tech University), Adam Brewer (Florida Institute of Technology), Wesley H. Dotson (Texas Tech University - Burkhart Center for Autism Education and Research) |
Abstract: As technology-based instructional methods become more present in academic programming for students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), researchers are called upon to examine the effectiveness of these methods over “treatment as usual” or traditional educational strategies. Computer-based activities represent one technology-based method with an emerging empirical base; however, the majority of peer-reviewed studies on computer-based studies focus on limited dependent variables of interest without direct comparison to another instructional method (e.g., Bosseler & Massaro, 2003; de Bruin, Deppeler, Moore, & Diamond, 2013; Everhart, Alber-Morgan, & Park, 2011; Moore & Calvert, 2000; Ramdoss et al., 2011). The current study expands the computer-based literature base with a comprehensive examination of four dependent variables relevant to how children with ASD interact with instructional materials. Accuracy, engagement (i.e., on-task behavior), rate of completion, and preference were evaluated using a within-subjects treatment design. Eight school-age participants with ASD completed mathematics problems via both computer and paper-pencil worksheet conditions. Results illustrated differences in computer-based and worksheet conditions that appeared slightly counter-intuitive, particularly data regarding accuracy and preference. Given the results, future directions for technology-based instruction should aim to clarify the effective components of computer-based methodology, including factors related to technology, feedback, learner functioning, and subject domain. |
|
|
60. An Adapted Shared Reading Program Implemented in Inclusive Pre-School Classrooms |
Area: EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
ANDREA GOLLOHER (UC Berkeley/San Francisco State) |
Abstract: The Pathways to Literacy reading program (Lee, Mims, & Browder, 2011) is a task-analytic approach to addressing engagement, comprehension, and communication during shared reading for students with exceptional needs. Previous research on Pathways to Literacy has been limited to students in segregated elementary classrooms rather than preschool classrooms, which is when shared reading is usually emphasized. The program has been heavily critiqued due to the lack of generalization data available, with critics claiming students would be unable to engage with new books. The current study adds to the literature by investigating the use of the reading program in inclusive preschool settings. Three questions were addressed. First, using a multiple baseline design, the question of whether the reading program remained effective for preschool students in inclusive classrooms was asked. Second, teachers? perceptions of the reading program were explored through pre- and post-intervention interviews. Finally, generalization to new books was investigated. Results suggest the reading program was effective in increasing engagement, comprehension, and communication for the targeted students. Social validity data suggest the teachers found the procedures were generally appropriate for preschool students, although they did recommend changes to the protocol. Finally, all participants generalized their new skills to new books. |