Association for Behavior Analysis International

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that the science of human behavior is powerful and that many methodologies stemming from this science have made extensive improvements in almost every area that they have been applied. Freedom, dignity, and the pursuit of a good life have been long-standing topics of conversation in behavior analysis. While it is true that our science has made tremendous growth since its inception, its application to socially significant problems has been far from perfect and is not beyond reproach. The purpose of this panel is to have a constructive, yet critical, discussion of behavior analysis’ promise and potential. Topics will include, but are not limited to, non-coerced choice making, assent, quality of life, human rights, social validity versus invalidity, quality therapeutic environments, and the balance that often needs to be struck between these topics while also providing effective behavioral intervention to the populations we serve.

The target audience for this panel are those practitioners (e.g., BCBAs, BCaBAs) in our field that find themselves struggling with some of the concerns leveled against our science and practice. It would be beneficial, but not necessary, for audience members to be familiar with some seminal works in this area (e.g., Bannerman et al., 1990; Fawcett, 1991; Holland, 1978).