|
Using a Reinforcement Based Treatment Package to Increase Food Acceptance |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Studio AB, Niveau 2 |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Jessica Weber, Ph.D. |
JESSICA WEBER (Els for Autism Foundation), Anibal Gutierrez Jr. (University of Miami) |
Description: Selective eating or "picky eating" is often described as a reluctance to try new foods based on some dimension of the food. Children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder frequently exhibit these types of selective eating behaviors. Rigidity or adherence to sameness is a defining feature of autism that may extend to feeding and lead to habits that are difficult for parents to break. These feeding difficulties may cause significant parent stress and could potentially lead to more severe mealtime behaviors in the future. Interventions to address feeding challenges, often incorporate the use of escape extinction. Escape extinction is a highly effective procedure that has demonstrated significant success, however, for children who display less severe feeding behaviors, the use of escape extinction may not be necessary. Moreover, parents are often hesitant to implement escape extinction when their child displays more mild feeding related behaviors. The treatment package presented has demonstrated success in increasing food acceptance by individuals diagnosed with ASD, without the use of escape extinction. This workshop will teach participants to implement the treatment package and provide results of a study evaluating the effectiveness of the procedure. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) describe the features of picky eating; (2) describe the steps in the Picky Eating manual; (3) administer the Picky Eating assessment tool; (4) implement the Picky Eating program steps to increase food acceptance; (5) train caregivers on the use of the steps in the Picky Eating program. |
Activities: Workshop objectives will be met through lecture, video demonstrations, guided practice and role play. |
Audience: The workshop is designed for providers, including BCBAs, BCaBAs and RBTs, who work with children with autism. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): autism, food selectivity, picky eating |
|
|
Using Play-Based Discrete Trials to Teach Infants, Toddlers, and Preschoolers With Autism and Developmental Disabilities |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Scene C, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT/DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: E. Amanda Boutot, Ph.D. |
E. AMANDA BOUTOT (Texas State University), SAMUEL DIGANGI (Arizona State University) |
Description: Interventionists often find that more traditional formats of instruction associated with applied behavior analysis (ABA) (such as discrete trial training, DTT) may be challenging for very young learners (0-3 years). Practitioners report that physicians often recommend "FloorTime" as an alternative to ABA because of its focus on "play". The presenters have combined the concepts of play and the use of ABA principles, and specifically DTT, to teach very young learners functional skills within the context of play. This hands-on workshop will teach participants how to use play as a conduit for learning when teaching very young children with for autism or other developmental disabilities, even for children who are not yet proficient players. Based on 10 years broader practice and research supporting more naturalistic strategies, presenters will describe the rationale behind conducting discrete trials in a play-based format, as well as demonstrate and provide guided practice. Additionally, participants will learn the difference between "controlling reinforcers" and using play materials and activities as discrimintative stimuli in play-based DTT. We will discuss the concept of contriving the motivational operant, share tips on program development within the context of play as well as methods of data collection within a play-based environment. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) Describe the rationale behind using play as a basis for DTT for very young leaners; (2) Explain the concept of contriving the motivational operant as it relate to play-based DTT; (3) Explain the difference between "maintaining reinforcer control" and using play materials as discriminative stimuli in play-based DTT; (4) Demonstrate DTT using play materials or activities appropriate for infants, toddlers, or preschoolers; (5) List and describe specific strategies (tips) for program development and data collection that may be unique to a play-based format. |
Activities: Workshop objectives will be met through a combination of lecture, discussion, guided practice, small group breakout, and video observation. |
Audience: Basic: appropriate for BCaBAs and BCBAs. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): early intervention, naturalistic instruction, preschoolers, toddlers |
|
|
Using Video Modeling Techniques to Improve Social Behaviors of Preschoolers With Autism |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Scene DEF, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT/PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Kathleen McCabe-Odri, Ed.D. |
KATHLEEN MCCABE-ODRI (Partners In Learning, Inc.), LAUREN DEGRAZIA (Partners in Learning, Inc.), NICOLE M. RZEMYK (Partners in Learning, Inc.), JENNIFER CORNELY (Partners in Learning, Inc.), LORI LORENZETTI (Partners in Learning, Inc,) |
Description: Video modeling (VM), in which the subject is shown a video version of a behavior he/she is to imitate, is a well-researched method used to improve a variety of deficits for learners with autism, particularly in the area of social skills (Charlop, 2007). Some benefits of video modeling are:
- Faster acquisition/better generalization than in vivo modeling
- Accentuates certain stimulus features
- Minimizes distracting/irrelevant features
- Is an engaging medium for longer attending
- Does not require social interaction during learning
Video modeling offers options for intervention, specifically: peer modeling, self-modeling, and video point of view. Peer modeling utilizes same age/sex peers proficient in performing the skill. Video self-modeling uses the learner and editing processes as the model. Video point of view shows the video version of the behavior from the subject's visual perspective. Combining VM with other evidence-based practices provides learners with a comprehension plan to improve a variety of social behaviors. Today's technology makes video programming user-friendly. This workshop demonstrates via case studies how preschoolers with autism benefit from VM to increase play, respond/initiate conversation, and improve participation in social activities within an inclusive preschool. Participants have the opportunity to learn to use current apps/devices via hands-on tutorials and sample VM options. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) define the major types of video modeling options; (2) match video approach to address specific target skill deficits; (3) define and measure subject's progress with video modeling protocols; (4) implement video modeling intervention using current technology,including editing simple video clips. |
Activities: The format combines lecture, video demonstration, hands-on tutorial instruction and discussion |
Audience: BCBAs, junior BCBAs |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Designing Individualized Treatment Programs for Adolescents and Adults Across the Autism Spectrum |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Forum Auditorium, Niveau 1 |
Area: AUT/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Jennifer Yakos, M.A. |
JENNIFER YAKOS (Institute for Behavioral Training (IBT)), CECILIA KNIGHT (Institute for Behavioral Training) |
Description: As the population of individuals with ASD continues to grow, treatment planning for teenagers and adults is becoming a top priority for many clients, caregivers and professionals. While the number of older adolescents and adults with ASD is rising, most treatment options are aimed at early intervention, or the treatment of young children. Support services for adolescents and adults with ASD are scarce, and often times do not reflect the vastly different needs of individuals on all levels of the spectrum. This workshop will discuss the importance of developing individualized ABA treatment of older individuals with ASD, through appropriate assessment and prioritization of needs. Additionally, several specific treatment models with goals and strategies will be discussed to address the varying needs for teenagers and adults on the autism spectrum. Specifically, programming options for teaching adults who are mildly, moderately and severely affected will be reviewed, including programming to teach higher order social skills and perspective taking, skills for independent living and vocational success, and skills for functional communication and self-care. This presentation will also address specific ethical considerations for treating older children and adults, specifically how to protect client dignity and facilitate clients into decision making and management of their own treatment. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) Identify specific factors to consider when assessing and prioritizing the needs of adolescents and adult clients with ASD; (2) Identify and review several programming options for older individuals with ASD according to varying levels of need, including advanced social skills instruction, independent living and vocational skills instruction, and functional communication and self-care; (3) Identify relevant treatment goals and intervention strategies for clients within several case study vignettes; (4) Identify specific ethical considerations regarding the treatment of adolescents and adults with ASD including the promotion of client dignity and self-advocacy. |
Activities: Workshop activities will include lecture, discussion, video demonstration, and small group breakout tasks. |
Audience: This workshop would be appropriate for BCBAs, therapists, educators, administrators, caregivers, or other professionals involved in the treatment of adolescents and adults with ASD. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): autism adolescents, autism adults, individualized treatment |
|
|
Cultivating Workplace Wellbeing With Behavioral Science |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Studio F, Niveau 2 |
Area: CSS/OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Julie M. Slowiak, Ph.D. |
JULIE M. SLOWIAK (University of Minnesota Duluth; InJewel LLC) |
Description: Workplace stress, driven by a variety of factors, can have a direct and negative impact on employee wellbeing and, consequently, an indirect and potentially negative impact on those with whom employees interact (e.g., coworkers, clients, family members, friends) (Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2016). This workshop is designed to provide behavior analysts with knowledge, tools, and techniques that will allow them to make a noticeable, positive impact on their own wellbeing, on the wellbeing of their employees or clients, and ultimately, on society as a whole. An understanding of the dimensions of wellbeing that tie to both individual and organizational values will assist behavior analysts' efforts to design interventions that promote sustainable behavior change. The workshop instructor will provide an overview of the basic wellbeing concept, introduce attendees to dimensions of wellbeing, describe self-management tools and provide tips to promote healthy and productive lifestyle behaviors, and describe and share data from recent research aimed at promoting and supporting wellbeing in the workplace. The workshop instructor will guide participants through a series of exercises that will allow participants to both identify specific, values-based goals that they would like to work toward and to develop an action plan for change. This workshop is designed to be highly interactive; participants will receive feedback from the workshop instructor, be asked to engage in large and small group discussions, and be asked to share their goals and action plans with other workshop participants. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) Describe the basic wellbeing concept; (2) Describe at least six dimensions of wellbeing; (3) Describe at least five self-management tools and techniques to improve wellbeing; (4) Describe recent findings from research aimed at promoting and supporting wellbeing in the workplace; (5) State at least one specific, values-based goal for improving personal wellbeing; (6) Describe an action plan for pursuing their values-based wellbeing goal. |
Activities: Workshop objectives will be met through a balanced presentation of lecture, guided practice/exercises, and small and large group discussion. Core content will be taught through lecture and demonstration of strategies will be provided. Supplemental materials for identifying personal levels wellbeing, developing goals, and designing an action plan will be provided in order to support participant learning. |
Audience: This workshop is designed to provide those with a basic understanding of behavior analysis and those currently practicing as behavior analysts with knowledge, tools, and techniques that will allow them to make a noticeable, positive impact on their own wellbeing, on the wellbeing of their employees or clients, and ultimately, on society as a whole. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): organizational health, sustainable change, values, wellbeing |
|
|
Providing an Effective Curriculum for Children and Adults With Limited Skill Repertoires and Problem Behavior |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Forum ABC, Niveau 1 |
Area: DDA/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Patrick E. McGreevy, Ph.D. |
PATRICK E. MCGREEVY (Patrick McGreevy, Ph.D., P.A.), TROY FRY (Patrick McGreevy, Ph.D., P.A) |
Description: Those working with children and adults with limited skill repertoires and problem behavior often find that selecting targets for skill acquisition is extremely challenging. They are often provided with developmental curricula (e.g., the VB-MAPP, ABLLS-R, or Denver Early Start Model) designed primarily for young children with autism or delays in language and social skills, who acquire intraverbal repertoires and experience stimulus generalization and novel responses. Skills that are part of these curricula are often not functional for children or adults with limited skill repertoires or problem behavior. This workshop will describe the difference between developmental and functional skills (for example, the difference between rote counting and counting objects) and why functional skills are important for these children and adults. This workshop will then provide a review of the available functional skills curricula and an analysis of these instruments with respect to the principles and procedures of our science. This workshop will also describe how teaching functional skills improves the teaching repertoires of behavior analysts. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) describe the difference between developmental and functional skills; (2) describe three developmental and three corresponding functional skills; (3) describe why children and adults with limited skill repertoires and problem behavior should be taught functional, rather than developmental, skills; (4) describe how teaching teaching functional skills improves their overall teaching repertoire. |
Activities: This workshop will include lecture, demonstrations, and guided practice for participants. |
Audience: The target audience is BCBAs and BCABAs with limited experience, who are being asked to provide intensive instruction for children and adults with limited skill repertoires and problem behavior. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Developmental skills, Functional skills, Generalization, Language skills |
|
|
Reconsidering Our Approach to Supervision: What Every Behavior Analyst Needs to Know About Delivering Effective Supervision |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Loft GH, Niveau 3 |
Area: OBM/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Alyssa N. Wilson, Ph.D. |
ALYSSA N. WILSON (Saint Louis University), HEATHER LYNN LEWIS (Saint Louis University) |
Description: Behavior analytic research on supervision has identified the effectiveness of using behavioral applications (e.g., behavioral skills training) to teach competent trainees. Supervisors may need additional assistance with identifying evidence-based practices when it comes to implementing effective and competency-based supervision, particularly when supervising large groups of trainees. Therefore, the current experiential workshop seeks to assist supervisors who a) work with multiple trainee's in a given period of time, and b) collaborate with outside corporations, including Universities, in order to provide attendee's an opportunity to refine their supervision skill sets. The workshop will highlight 5 domains of the supervision process: (1) supervisor-trainee relationship during and after supervisory period, (2) delivering competency-based supervision, (3) successful tips for managing independent and group supervision, (4) organization strategies (e.g., evaluation rubrics, mapping clinical projects, goal setting, etc.), and (5) shaping professional behavior. Attendees will be provided supplemental materials during the workshop, to practice the skills presented. The workshop will use in-vivo training paired with problem-based learning paradigms to assist attendee's with acquiring skills discussed during the workshop. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) List important features and elements of supervision; (2) Determine best-practices for supervision; (3) List aspects of appropriate supervisor-trainee relationships throughout various phases of supervision; (4)Demonstrate competency-based supervision skills; (5)Demonstrate skills for conducting individual and group supervision; (6) Design and implement organization strategies. |
Activities: The workshop will use lecture, discussion, video observation, in-vivo modeling, rehearsal, and feedback to assist trainees with achieving the learning objectives. Problem-based learning (e.g., small groups work through a supervision issue/problem) will be used to assist attendees with putting the discussed skills into practice. In-vivo and video demonstrations of strategies will be conducted with group discussions and role-play to ensure skill acquisition. Supplemental materials will be provided to support attendee learning during the workshop. Attendees will also be able to use the supplemental materials after the workshop, as an example/guide for the supervision process. |
Audience: The nature of the workshop is geared towards behavior analysts who are new to supervision or whom have previous supervision experience. The content of the workshop will be focused on the foundation of all effective supervision strategies (i.e., reliance on basic concepts of behavior), and will be tailored to establishing best practices. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): behavior analysis, Supervision |
|
|
Root Cause Analysis and Behavior Analysis: Applying Root Cause Analysis to Incidents and Assessment of Problem Behavior |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Forum GHIJ, Niveau 1 |
Area: PRA/PCH; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Merrill Winston, Ph.D. |
MERRILL WINSTON (Professional Crisis Management, Inc.), LARAINE WINSTON (Life Targets, LLC) |
Description: Root cause analysis has been used for decades to analyze the causes of major disasters and is used by agencies such as the NTSB to determine the cause(s) of airline disasters but it is also used for any industry that requires a detailed analysis of the chain of events that led to a particular outcome. This workshop will apply this type of analysis to behavioral incidents as well to the analysis of problem behavior |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) conduct a root cause analysis; (2) apply a root cause analysis to a behavioral incident; (3) apply a root cause analysis to assist in the understanding of all the causes for a given behavior problem. |
Activities: The workshop will be comprised of lecture and then the participants will be broken into groups and given sample incidents for which they will conduct their own root cause analysis. This will be followed up by more lecture. Participants will also be given sample behavior problems and the function(s) of the behavior and will attempt a root cause analysis to help explain why a particular function has taken dominance in the maintenance of the behavior |
Audience: The target audience is practicing behavior analysts who wish to augment their ability to track down numerous variables that all contribute to behavior problems and/or behavioral incidents |
Content Area: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Functional Assessment, Root Cause |
|
|
Standard Celeration Charting |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: TBA/EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Abigail B. Calkin, Ph.D. |
ABIGAIL B. CALKIN (Calkin Consulting Center), Kristine F. Melroe (Morningside Academy) |
Description: The workshop will review the uses of the standard celeration chart (SCC) across the past 50 years with emphasis on its scientific charting and analyses of human performance in education and in other areas such as inner behavior and areas that impact society. The behavior charts shown will be individual and systemic. Participants will review writing precise performance statements (pinpoint behaviors), standard charting conventions, the three important dimensions of behavior to monitor--frequency, celeration, and bounce, and how to analyze data on the chart to assist in decision making. Some of the research and articles shared will be analyses and publications in international journals of educational research and behavior analysis. The guidelines and standards followed are those set by universities, school districts and communities for improvement in performance and learning. Attendees bringing their computers will assist in individual learning. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) state and analyze the content of the data on an SCC in terms of its frequency, celeration, and bounce (variability) in 1 minute; (2) make data-based decisions off of a variety of charts in educational and social (including inner behavior) fields; (3) state his/her new area of expertise and will list what kinds of decisions s/he will assist others to make once back at work after ABAI-Paris; (4) write new workshop learnings to facilitate practicing them once home. |
Activities: Instructional strategies include lecture with slides to impart knowledge, videos of people in learning situations for examples, and small group sharing of ideas about solutions. Activities to meet workshop objectives will include lecture, video observations, practice of chart interpretation, and written plans for implantation of workshop learning. Supplemental materials will be available online at the time of and after the workshop. The format will include lecture, guided practice, many frequency building exercises, and brief small group discussions. |
Audience: This workshop assumes the participants have a basic knowledge of the standard celeration chart and that they have used it. This workshop will be given an intermediate level and is designed to provide information on chart-based decision-making to advance the skills of the participants. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): precision teaching |
|
|
The Acquisition of Behavioral Cusps as the Basics to Develop Language |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
7:00 AM–9:00 AM |
Forum EF, Niveau 1 |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Richard E. Laitinen, Ph.D. |
GLADYS WILLIAMS (CIEL, SPAIN), RICHARD E. LAITINEN (Personalized Accelerated Learning Systems (PALS)) |
Description: The purpose of this workshop is to discuss the acquisition of behavioral cusps as basic elements to develop language. Research has shown that basic prerequisites greatly enhance an individual's ability to develop functional language. In this workshop we will provide an overview of the teaching procedures designed to develop these basic skills and tactics to strengthen observational learning in the individual. We will discuss several strategies developed to bring vocal emissions under stimulus control. This discussion will include some basic strategies for teaching tacts as well as a detailed outline of the Rapid Tacting protocol. Building on that knowledge we will introduce a structure that contains elements of Direct Instruction (DI), Precision Teaching (PT) and Relational Frame Theory (RFT), designed to gradually increasing the sophistication and complexity of language with the goal of becoming a functional speaker. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: 1. Identify and describe pre-listener skill repertoires; 2. Identify and describe listener repertoires; 3. Identify and describe speaker verbal repertoires; 4. Practice use of strategies to teach basic speaker verbal repertoires; 5. Identify and describe repertoires that support language flexibility; 6. Identify what describe component skills of each verbal repertoire. |
Activities: Combines- lecture, discussion, small break out-group, video observation, and targeted reading. |
Audience: Intermediate |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): autism, behavioral cusps, skill acquisition, verbal behavior |
|
|
Exploring the Systematic Use of Self-Monitoring as a Behavioral Intervention: The Self & Match System |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Forum Auditorium, Niveau 1 |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Katharine M. Croce, Ed.D. |
KATHARINE M. CROCE (Chicago School of Professional Psychology; Bucks C), JAMIE SIDEN SALTER (San Diego County Office of Education) |
Description: This interactive and hands-on workshop will provide an excellent opportunity for individuals to learn a well-defined, systematic self-monitoring intervention and motivational system. Participants attending this workshop will leave with a comprehensive tool in hand to implement immediately. This session will explore peer-reviewed research that supports the implementation of self-monitoring systems for students of various ages and developmental levels. A discussion of self-monitoring procedures incorporating a match component will be presented, with specific focus on the Self & Match System, a user-friendly, easy to implement, empirically-supported system. Participants in this training will acquire a systematic guide to planning self-monitoring systems, as well as a Self & Match manual with substantial training materials. Additionally, participants will strengthen their knowledge of necessary considerations prior to implementing any self-monitoring or motivational system. The Self & Match System has been used internationally to support individuals with emotional behavior disorders, autism, learning disabilities, and unidentified students in general education. The Self & Match System can be incorporated into individualized behavior systems or class-wide and school-wide management procedures as a part of school-wide PBIS. It has been successfully implemented in a variety of settings, including public and private schools, clinics, homes, and recreational settings. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: (1) identify the research-based benefits of self-monitoring; (2) effectively apply, individualize, and monitor progress of a self-monitoring system; (3) identify the necessary components of an effective motivational system; (4) identify the importance of pre-treatment planning on the effectiveness of intervention; (5) identify the basic components of the Self & Match System; (6) systematically individualize an intervention based on collaborative and critical thinking; (7) create a Self & Match self-monitoring system to implement in their workplace; (8) systematically consider function in the development of self-monitoring interventions and reinforcement opportunities. |
Activities: During the course of this hands-on workshop, participants will strengthen the skills needed to effectively develop self-monitoring behavioral interventions incorporating a match component. This workshop will review the purpose/rationale of self-monitoring, the benefits of self-monitoring, and the components of an effective Self & Match system. Additionally, participants will interactively complete a systematic considerations guide prior to implementation to lead them on their way to creating their own Self & Match System. The format combines lecture, small group collaboration, small group discussion-oriented activities, whole group responding utilizing interactive digital polling software, and interactive dialogue. Core content will be taught through a combination of lecture, video examples, data analysis, and guided practice. |
Audience: This workshop is designed for behavior analysts, consultants, school psychologists, autism specialists, special educators, teachers, administrators, parents, students, and/or others who primarily support individuals from pre-K to 21 in school, home, or clinic settings. This is a great workshop for individuals and/or teams. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Autism, Behavior Intervention, School, Self-monitoring |
|
|
Preference and Reinforcement: The Keys to Maximizing Productivity With Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Scene C, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT/DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Richard B. Graff, Ph.D. |
RICHARD B. GRAFF (The May Institute) |
Description: Behavior analyst practitioners, teachers, and parents use reinforcement-based procedures with individuals with autism spectrum disorder and developmental and intellectual disabilities to increase desirable behavior and to reduce undesirable behavior. The ultimate success of these procedures depends on the clinician's ability to a) identify effective reinforcers and b) arrange their delivery in an effective fashion. Understanding how to identify reinforcers, which is critical to designing and implementing effective reinforcement-based interventions, requires a working knowledge of preference and reinforcer assessments. This workshop reviews different preference assessment methods that have been published in the behavior analytic literature, how to identify stimuli to include in assessments, and the prerequisite skills required for each assessment. Variables that influence preference assessment outcomes are then reviewed, including the effects of pre-assessment motivating operations and differential consequences following selection responses. A brief introduction to different methods commonly used to assess reinforcer efficacy is provided, and variables that influence the effectiveness of reinforcers are reviewed. Next, recently published peer-reviewed research on innovative methods to train staff and parents how to implement commonly used preference assessment procedures will be reviewed; protocols and data sheets for implementing these assessments will be provided to attendees. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) describe three different preference assessment methods; (2) describe the prerequisite skills required for each preference assessment; (3) describe three different reinforcer assessment methods; (4) name at least two factors that affect the efficacy of reinforcers; (5) describe potential solutions to changes in reinforcer value. |
Activities: Workshop objectives will be met through a balanced presentation of lecture, group discussion, and live and/or video demonstrations. Supplemental materials will be provided in order to support participant learning. |
Audience: This workshop is designed for behavior analyst practitioners who work with individuals with autism spectrum disorder and developmental and intellectual disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Following a Safer and More Efficient Functional Analysis and Treatment Model |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Scene DEF, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Mahshid Ghaemmaghami, Ph.D. |
MAHSHID GHAEMMAGHAMI (University of the Pacific), JESSICA SLATON (Nashoba Learning Group, Western New England University) |
Description: Functional analysis is a powerful methodological tool that can provide an effective and humane treatment for problem behavior (Hanley, Iwata, & McCord, 2003). Despite its growing empirical support, a recent survey (Oliver, Pratt, & Normand, 2015) suggests that the majority of practicing behavior analysts are not conducting functional analyses to inform treatment considerations. Practitioners may be avoiding the functional analysis because of concerns that it places the patient or clinician in a dangerous environment and requires too much time or resources. We will be teaching the audience how to conduct an interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis that takes an average of 25 min (e.g., Jessel, Hanley, & Ghaemmaghami, 2016; Ghaemmaghami, Hanley, & Jessel, 2016), and presenting a collection of replications from clinical practice. We will then discuss how to use the results of the functional analysis to design effective, function-based treatments that include the teaching of complex and developmentally appropriate functional communication skills, and skill-based delay tolerance procedures that increase other social behaviors such as compliance, task engagement, and social interaction, in order to affect more global changes in the functional repertoires needed to be successful in contextually complex environments with natural reinforcement contingencies. Both socially mediated problem behavior and automatically maintained non-injurious stereotypy will be discussed. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: (1) design and conduct an interview-formed synthesized functional analysis of problem behavior in approximately 25 minutes, (2) teach complex functional communication skills, (3) teach toleration for delays and denials to reinforcement, (4) program for generalization and maintenance of these skills. |
Activities: The workshop format will include lecture and discussion of material, small group activities, and guided activities from a workbook on designing functional analysis and function-based treatment. |
Audience: BCBAs, BCBA-Ds, BCaBAs, licensed psychologists, and other behavior analytic providers interested in learning a fast and safe approach to assessing and treating problem behavior. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): FCT, problem behavior, synthesized FA, tolerance training |
|
|
Beyond Mand Training: Increasing Meaningful Social Behaviour in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Studio AB, Niveau 2 |
Area: AUT/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Susan E. Tirella, M.Ed. |
SUSAN E. TIRELLA (Forest Bridge School), Sarah Walker (Forest Bridge School) |
Description: While traditional applied behaviour analysis programs are often extremely effective in increasing communication skills and remediating repetitive, stereotyped behaviours in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder; many fail to address social skills beyond initiating social interactions through mand training. This workshop will review the application of Teaching Interactions (Leaf, et al., 2009), and how to implement them while following a comprehensive social skills curriculum (Winner, 2005) for individuals with high-functioning Autism. Participants will learn how to increase appropriate social behaviours in structured teaching sessions through the use of discrimination training and role-play and how to program for generalization to natural contingencies by establishing a socially significant rationale for change and systematically shaping approximations. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) identify socially significant social behaviours to increase; (2) identify the components of an effective teaching plan based on teaching interactions; (3) develop a lesson plan that increases the identified social behaviour and programs for generalization to natural contingencies. |
Activities: Instructional strategies include: lecture, discussion, video observation and small group breakout. |
Audience: BCaBAs, BCBAs, or other individuals with experience and training in ABA and a basic understanding of typical social skills development. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
The Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills and the Development of Comprehensive Treatment Programs |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Forum ABC, Niveau 1 |
Area: DDA/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Marie Laure Joelle Nuchadee, Ph.D. |
MARIE LAURE JOELLE NUCHADEE (French ABA) |
Description: The Applied Behavior Analysis Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Practice Guidelines for Healthcare Funders and Managers states that "A developmentally appropriate ABA assessment process must identify strengths and weaknesses across domains and potential barriers to progress. The information from this process is the basis for developing the individualized ABA treatment plan." There are numerous existing tools that aim at assessing learner's abilities and skills levels, however the assessment process required for the development of comprehensive treatment programs or focused treatments can be complex. This workshop will cover the different existing clinical tools used by professionals in behavior analysis working with developmentally impaired patients allowing a detailed analysis of the skills of the students, but focus more particularly on the use of the Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills (ABLLS-R) and its skills-tracking system and how it can be used to identify the skills to be targeted both in comprehensive as well as focused treatments. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) observe and document the skills present in the behavioral repertoire of a child; (2) target the learning needs of a student; (3) develop a focused treatment according to the results of the assessment; (4) develop a comprehensive treatment according to the results of the assessment. |
Activities: Lecture, small group activities on case studies, discussion |
Audience: Professionals with basic knowledge in ABA and looking forward to strengthen their knowledge in applied behavior analysis |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): behavioral assessment, comprehensive treatment |
|
|
Procedural Integrity of Clinical Programming in Applied Settings |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Loft GH, Niveau 3 |
Area: OBM/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Helena L. Maguire, M.S. |
HELENA L. MAGUIRE (Melmark New England; Endicott College), SILVA ORCHANIAN (Melmark New England), Jill Harper (Melmark New England; Endicott College) |
Description: The clinical effectiveness of a behavior support plan relies not only on the technological sophistication of the written plan, but also on the ability of direct service staff to accurately and consistently implement the behavior support plan. This workshop will present the staff training, supervisory training, and performance-monitoring systems for clinical programming that have evolved over the past 17 years at Melmark New England: a private, not for profit, community-based organization serving children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders, acquired brain injury, neurological diseases and disorders, dual diagnosis, and severe challenging behaviors. Following a review of the OBM literature on effective systems development, workshop participants will review sample-training schedules, training protocols, performance monitoring tools, as well as procedures for training supervisors to implement these systems. The goal of workshop will be to provide participants with empirically based systems the research to ensure competent and accurate implementation of clinical programs. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to:(1) identify the components of an effective staff training program; (2) select training protocols for sample clients; (3) identify the components of training systems necessary for supervisory staff; (4) identify areas where performance-monitoring tools and systems should be developed.
|
Activities: Instructional strategies will include lecture, large- and small-group discussion, small-group activities, and guided practice. |
Audience: The target audience includes individuals with the responsibility of training or overseeing the training of direct service staff and development of supervisory training programs. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Procedural Integrity, Staff Training, Supervision Training |
|
|
From Supervision to Consultation: Development of Competent Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA) |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Forum GHIJ, Niveau 1 |
Area: PRA/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Dana Garner, Ph.D. |
DANA GARNER (Garner Behavior Services LLC ; Penn State), CHERICE R. CARDWELL (Association Francaise Les Professionnels de l'Analyse du Comportement), NICOLE TURON-DIAZ (Learning By Design, LLC) |
Description: This workshop will cover ethics and practices when providing supervision to BACB applicants. The BACB Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts will be cited to support interaction between supervisor and supervisee. Research will be cited that supports a variety of successful and ethical options for supervision (i.e., Sellers, Valentine, & Leblanc, 2016). The first portion of the workshop will cover ethical delivery of supervised field experience to BACB applicants. The second portion of the workshop will discuss how the skills learned within supervision influence competent consultation and ethical behavior when guiding home ABA programming. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) identify necessary components of a supervision contract; (2) identify qualifications of BCBA/BCBA-Ds that are ethically able to provide supervision to BACB applicants; (3) identify BACB applicants that are ethically qualified to begin receiving supervision from BCBA/BCBA-Ds; (4) identify the components of a supervisor/supervisee relationship, when the relationship begins and terminates; (5) describe ethical code of conduct from the BACB Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts that relate to provision of supervised field experience; (6) list qualifications of a competent BCBA/BCBA-D for home programming. |
Activities: Workshop Activities: 1. Lecture 2. Group discussion 3. Small group break out for activities |
Audience: Target audience includes: BCBAs, BCBA-Ds, BCaBAs who are providing home programming, and individuals receiving supervised field experience. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Using Motivational Interviewing Techniques to Alter Motivating Operations and Increase Parent Engagement in ABA Therapy |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: TBA/PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Monica Gilbert, M.S. |
MONICA GILBERT (Crystal Minds New Beginning) |
Description: Behavior Analysts often find barriers when providing parent training. Although Behavior Analysts offer empirically validated strategies and successfully change behaviors, it can be difficult for parents to adhere to treatment. A reason for parents inability to engage in treatment may be due to their "resistance". Resistance is defined as a private event that is evoked by an antecedent stimuli (clinician's confrontational language), which is reinforced by escape of the aversive stimuli. Motivating Operations have a behavior/value altering effect in that they make "escaping" the stimuli (clinician) by engaging in resistant behaviors more or less reinforcing. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an empirically proven intervention that has shown substantial success in the literature in changing addictive behaviors in substance abusers, medication adherence, and developmental disabilities. MI is the route by which private events can be altered by using "change talk" strategies to decrease resistant behaviors and increase cooperation between parents and clinicians. In this workshop, we will discuss private events as Skinner defined it and as they relate to MI strategies. We will also present the proven strategies of MI to decrease resistance and foster a collaborative working relationship between parent and clinicians. Transtheoretical model (stages of readiness) will also be presented. Attendees will build skills in assessing level of resistance and use change talk procedures to successfully decrease them. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) Assess parent's motivation based on the trans-theoretical model and using different proven measures; (2) Provide examples of effective change talk strategies to develop and build collaborative relationships with parents; (3) Describe motivation using private events; (4) Identify traps that can harm clinician-parental relationships; (5) Describe key features of effective MI strategies; (6) Measure change talk vs. counter-change talk; (7) Identify key features necessary for cooperative relationships between caregivers and clinicians. |
Activities: Workshop activities will include didactic instruction, small group breakout, guided practice and role-plays. |
Audience: Certified behavior analysts (BCaBA, BCBA), licensed psychologists, and graduate students. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
Speech Science for the Behavior Analyst: Behavioral Tricks to Remediate Speech Errors |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
9:15 AM–11:15 AM |
Forum EF, Niveau 1 |
Area: VBC/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Janine Shapiro, M.S. |
JANINE SHAPIRO (Access Behavior Analysis) |
Description: This workshop will detail aspects of speech science relevant for behavior analysts who treat clients with speech errors. Attendees will practice analyzing speech errors to determine the most useful prompting procedures to improve intelligibility. Examples of different prompting and prompt fading procedures that are behavior analytic in nature will be demonstrated and videos of implementation with clients will be shown for clarity. A framework for how to divide up therapeutic resources across verbal and non-verbal means of communication will be provided. Peer-reviewed journal articles that support unlikely positions such as the use of alternative augmentative communication as a means to promote verbal communication will be discussed. The last forty-five minutes will be dedicated to the discussion of specific cases from audience members. The previous content of the workshop will be referenced during this discussion. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) state the three aspects that define any speech sound in any language; (2) determine which aspect(s) of a speech sound is in error when provided with the target sound and the error sound produced by the client; (3) demonstrate at least three different prompting procedures to remediate speech errors; (4) list the six different speech-language profiles of clients; (5) list two different speech errors that if noted, would immediately warrant referral to a speech-language pathologist and/or a physician. |
Activities: The workshop will be comprised of lecture, video observation, individual activities, and discussion. Materials that support the content as well as references for journal articles and books will be provided as handouts. |
Audience: The target audience is behavior analysts that treat patients with speech errors that affect intelligibility. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Incorporating Mindfulness Strategies into Behavioral Parent Training for Caregivers of Children With Autism and Developmental Disabilities |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Studio AB, Niveau 2 |
Area: AUT/DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Tracy Raulston, M.Ed. |
TRACY RAULSTON (University of Oregon), WENDY A. MACHALICEK (University of Oregon), Meme Hieneman (Positive Behavior Support Applications), Nell Caraway (IRIS Educational Media) |
Description: The purpose of this workshop is to provide practitioners with methods to incorporate mindfulness strategies into behavioral parent training for parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and developmental disabilities. Parents of children with ASD are at an increased risk for clinically significant stress and depression. Mindfulness has been found to be associated with decreased stress and depression in parents of children with ASD, even after accounting for child challenging behavior (Jones, Hastings, Totskia, Keane, & Rhule, 2014). Additionally, mindfulness training has been successfully applied to this population, resulting in decreased levels of stress and increased quality of life (Neece, 2014). Attendees of this workshop should have foundational skills in behavioral parent training/coaching. This workshop will focus on how to embed mindfulness strategies within behavioral support plans. Example strategies include training parents to: (a) observe stimuli within (e.g., breath, private events) and outside (e.g., sound, smell) themselves; (b) objectively attend to variables affecting their childs behavior without adding assumptions; (c) detach from unpleasant private events (e.g., negative thought patterns associated with parenting); and (d) implement interventions as designed and without reacting to stress. Instructional videos and guided audio meditations will be shared during the training. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) describe operationally defined behaviors of mindfulness; (2) describe how stress reduction strategies increase the potential social validity of behavioral parent training and coaching; (3) describe how to objective attend to and observe private events and sensory stimuli; (4) practice the behaviors required for a short mindfulness meditation, including appropriate sitting posture, breathing, and engagement in critical private events. |
Activities: Instructional strategies include lecture, discussion, video and audio sample, and group guided practice. |
Audience: This workshop is intended for attendees with skills and experience training parents in the use of behavioral support plans. No knowledge or skills in mindfulness practices are required. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): mindfulness, parent training, stress reduction |
|
|
The Use of Video Modeling for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in School-Based Settings |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Forum Auditorium, Niveau 1 |
Area: AUT/DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Christos Nikopoulos, Ph.D. |
CHRISTOS NIKOPOULOS (Autism Consultancy Services Ltd, London) |
Description: Over the last few decades, there has been a shift in emphasis from language-based instruction to more visual instructional supports as a catalyst for learning in individuals with multiple disabilities and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This is due to extensive reports that individuals with ASD demonstrate enhanced performance on simple visual search tasks that require detecting a target set among distracters. Given the visual superiority of people with ASD, it is perhaps not surprising that the majority of current educational programs for these individuals frequently employ visual supports. Picture prompts, photographic activity schedules, visual schedules, or videos appear to be appropriate and particularly motivating for these individuals. The range of target behaviors and different methods by which video modeling has been successfully implemented to teach individuals with ASD ages 3 to 20 years, attests to its robustness as an approach for supporting appropriate behaviors in this population. This approach, as it could be implemented in school-based settings, will be the focus of this workshop, wherein extensive and updated details and findings from the literature, as well as from the clinical and research practice of the instructor, will be provided to the audience. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, the participant will be able to: (1) name the salient features of video-modeling procedures as guided by findings from the literature (e.g., with what ages video modeling can be effective, what intervention goals can be addressed by the implementation of video modeling, in which settings video modeling can be effectively used, etc.); (2) describe different types of video modeling and the advantages and disadvantages of each type when targeting different performance areas in children with ASD (e.g., social skills, daily living skills, communication/language, play skills, joint attention, challenging behaviors); and (3) demonstrate step-by-step different types of video modeling (e.g., video modeling, self-modeling, priming modeling, point-of-view modeling) that could be designed and implemented in school-based settings. |
Activities: Instructional strategies include: lecture, guided practice, video demonstrations of practice strategies, real-life case scenarios and examples, small group activities as well as group discussion. |
Audience: Graduate students and RBTs, Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA), and Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analysts (BCaBA), psychologists as well as respective therapists and special educators working in a variety of applied and experimental settings as well as educational and social science settings who are interested in teaching a number of different skills to children/adolescents with ASD and other developmental disabilities. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Recent Research on Teaching Children With a Diagnosis of Autism |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Scene C, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT/VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: John W. Esch, Ph.D. |
JOHN W. ESCH (Esch Behavior Consultants, LLC) |
Description: Referring to the verbal behavior of an individual, Skinner (1957) writes: Reinforcing consequences continue to be important after verbal behavior has been acquired. Their principal function is then to maintain the response in strength. How often the speaker will emit a response depends, other things being equal, upon the over-all frequency of reinforcement in a given verbal community (p. 30). This quote highlights the importance of a verbal community in the development and maintenance of language with typically developing individuals. Persons with a diagnosis of autism may have limited verbal communities. Within family and educational settings, a verbal community may consist of only a single main caregiver and one or two teachers. This environment may hinder the development of skills necessary for emergent behavior, e.g., observational learning. This workshop will discuss the importance of a verbal and social community in the education of children with ASD. We will identify and describe recent research of instructional practices that encourage untaught emergent behavior. We will then consider the design of fun group activities that provide motivational events to support emergent behavior in a social community. Lastly, we will look at common language and social concerns, e.g., conditional verbal discriminations. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to:(1) describe why conditional verbal discriminations are difficult to learn and teach; (2) state the traditional instructional sequence for teaching children with ASD and the data supporting the recommended changes to that sequence; (3) explain potential benefits for using games in the instruction of ASD children. |
Activities: Workshop objectives will be met through lecture, keynote presentation, and video demonstrations of main points. |
Audience: This workshop is intended for BCBAs and advanced BaCBAs working with children or who are responsible for programming others who teach children with an ASD diagnosis. The workshop will address common instructional difficulties e.g., conditional verbal discriminations, instructional sequences, methods to encourage emergent behavior, reinforcement. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
I Get By With a Little Help From My Friends: Promoting Inclusion, Communication, and Social Skills Development |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Scene DEF, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Kimberly Maich, Ph.D. |
KIMBERLY MAICH (Brock University; Memorial University of Newfoundland), TRICIA VAN RHIJN (University of Guelph), SHERI MALLABAR (Brock University) |
Description: With continued transformation happening in Ontario, Canada Kindergarten classrooms and emphasis being placed on Inclusive Education, there is a growing need for more evidence-based interventions to promote development in a classroom of young children, each with unique needs. This early intervention strategy is designed to support the unique needs of students with social-communication difficulties (including Autism Spectrum Disorder). The purpose of this extensive research study is to identify and assess the effectiveness of a peer-mediated social skills program called Stay, Play, and Talk (Phase IV). The program has been designed to increase the engagement of kindergarten-aged children identified as having social-communication difficulties and their peers who are typically developing within an inclusive kindergarten classroom environment. This intervention is the fourth phase of a pilot project, following Phases I-III in various Ontario jurisdictions. Using a Single Case Research Design (Multiple Baseline Across Subjects) this project involved student participants with social-communication difficulties in inclusive classrooms (Intervention and Control). All students in the classroom were taught Stay, Play, and Talk, and the target children received intensive triad trainings with their peers. Preliminary findings for each phase of the study suggest a steady, high increase in the number of communications between the target children and their typically developing peers, after the intervention had taken place. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) identify the importance of peer-mediated social skills instruction within peer-mediated environments; (2) describe program structures involved in the Stay, Play, and Talk Intervention; (3) effectively deliver peer-mediated social skills training to young children. |
Activities: The format combines lecture, small group hands-on activities, guided practice, and will conclude with research findings from four phases a research study that support the effectiveness of this peer-mediated intervention (Stay, Play, and Talk: A Peer-Mediated Social Skills Program for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and other Social Communication Difficulties and their Peers Phases I-IV). |
Audience: Teachers, Early Childhood Educators, Educational Assistants, Special Education Consultants, Speech-Language Pathologists, Board Certified Behavior Analysts |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): Early Intervention, Inclusive Education, Kindergarten, Peer-Mediated Intervention |
|
|
Integration of Automatic and Social Reinforcement Interventions in Applied Settings: A Framework for Addressing Dual Diagnoses |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Loft A, Niveau 3 |
Area: CBM/DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Tina G. Patterson, M.Ed. |
TINA G. PATTERSON (Operations and Clinical Consultant) |
Description: The workshop will review the credible effects of component analysis on occurrences of high-intensity behaviors exhibited by students diagnosed with a developmental disability and psychiatric disorder in school settings. Automatic and Social Reinforcement have been analyzed using indirect, direct and experimental analysis procedures for decades with results indicating that when high-intensity behaviors are present for these contingencies, differential reinforcement interventions are effective in reducing harmful behaviors, (Thompson, et al, 1998; Miltenberger, 2005; Borero and Vollmer, 2006). The students had a history of physical aggression towards others, self-injurious behaviors, property destruction and elopement from the school grounds. We will review the components of interventions using differential reinforcement procedures combined with medical consultations. The results showed that each of the student's high intensity-behaviors was reduced and they were able to participate in large group settings with their same-age peers. BACB Professional and Ethical Compliance is addressed through the following codes: 2.09 � Treatment/Intervention Efficacy; 3.01 � Behavior Analytic Assessment; 3.02 � Medical Consultation; 4.09 � Least Restrictive Procedures; 7.0 � Behavior Analysts� Ethical Responsibility to Colleagues. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) explain positive and negative automatic reinforcement and positive and negative social reinforcement contingencies and their influence on high-intensity behaviors; (2) describe interventions using component analysis of assessment data; (3) identify differential reinforcement procedures to increase automatic and social functionally equivalent replacement behaviors. |
Activities: Workshop activities will include a combination of lecture, small group activities, video demonstrations and guided practice. The instructor will be prepared to address any learning or language barriers by providing supplemental materials. |
Audience: Intermediate |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): automatic reinforcement, intervention |
|
|
Empowering Behavior Analytic Perspective on Language: Implications of Relational Frame Theory for Children's Affective and Hyperactive Problems |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Forum ABC, Niveau 1 |
Area: DDA/CBM; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Carmen Luciano, Ph.D. |
CARMEN LUCIANO (University Almeria) |
Description: Relational Frame Theory (RFT; Hayes, Barnes-Holmes, & Roche, 2001) is a contextual approach to complex human behavior with increasing empirical evidence (Dymond & Roche, 2013) that conceives language and cognition as arbitrarily applicable relational responding. As such, RFT has the potential to generate practical applications in relatively new areas for behavior analysis. In fact, during the last few years, RFT is providing important applications in the clinical work with children in several areas including autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and emotional disorders (Rehfeldt & Barnes-Holmes; Dixon, 2015; Luciano, Valdivia-Salas, Cabello, & Hernndez, 2009; Ruiz & Perete, 2015). The aim of the current workshop is to present a sketch of these applications. Firstly, the basics of RFT will be summarized. Secondly, the implications of RFT for training verbal behavior will be presented. Thirdly, the connection between RFT and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT; Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999) will be presented for the treatment of psychological disorders in children competent in verbal behavior. Lastly, the complementarity and integration with traditional contingency management techniques will be highlighted. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to:(1) Identify the basics of RFT; (2) Understand the rational for developing self-regulation in hyperactive children; (3) Adapt ACT strategies based on RFT for the treatment of psychological disorders in children. |
Activities: Lecture, Small group breakout, Guided practice, Video observation |
Audience: Intermediate. Participants should have basic knowledge of relational frame theory and acceptance and commitment |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): children, emotional disorders, hyperactivity, RFT |
|
|
Effect Sizes for Single Case Experimental Designs: Demonstrating an Undesirable Baseline Trend |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Studio F, Niveau 2 |
Area: EAB/EDC; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: Kimberly Vannest, Ph.D. |
KIMBERLY VANNEST (Texas A&M University) |
Description: Overlap in Visual Analysis is well established and understood by the field, less widely accepted but gaining momentum is the addition of effect sizes to the interpretation of data. Effects size calculations can enhance analysis particularly when undesirable baseline trend or the variability characteristic of applied settings is present. Non-overlap effect sizes such as Tau U provide strong statistical power, control trend in a moderate way, data are directly interpretable, respect design features, and the calculations are easy, even by hand with short data series. This session will train behavior analysts to use effect sizes to enhance interpretation and allow behavior analyst remain in control of data analysis and interpretation. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) successfully identify difference between desirable or undesireable trend and lack of experimental control; (2) use two methods to calculated and adjust for trend in experimental data; (3) discuss implications of trended data in individual studies and meta-analytic research. |
Activities: This two hour work shop will include brief lecture, demonstration, practice opportunities and discussion. |
Audience: Graduate students, Scholars, Researchers, Clinicians in need of defensibility in practice. |
Content Area: Methodology |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Date Interpretation, Effect Sizes, Visual Analysis |
|
|
Pragmatic Supervision: Evaluate, Analyze, Change, and Repeat |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Loft GH, Niveau 3 |
Area: OBM/EDC; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Guy S. Bruce, Ed.D. |
GUY S. BRUCE (Appealing Solutions, LLC) |
Description: Pragmatic supervisors collect frequent, accurate, sensitive measures of client progress, and when clients are not meeting their progress goals, those supervisors make changes. A pragmatic supervision process includes the following steps: 1) Pinpoint performance problems worth solving. a. Collect frequent, accurate, sensitive measures of client progress. b. When clients are not meeting their progress goals, evaluate staff performance at the system, process, and individual levels. 2) Analyze causes of inadequate client progress and staff performance. 3) Recommend solutions, which may include changes in staff a. Resources b. Training c. Management. 4) Design and implement those solutions. 5) Evaluate Improvements in a. Client Progress b. Staff Performance. This 2-hour workshop includes a workbook with practice materials, practice cards, a tool for evaluating client progress and staff performance, andpractice and discussion of the pragmatic supervision process. I have taught longer versions of this workshop at ABAI conferences, Swiss ABA, Australia ABA, British Columbia ABA and at numerous agencies across the U.S., during the last several years. Participants should bring laptops and smartphones or tablets to the workshop to practice using a new application. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) define desired client results and necessary performance, then measure and evaluate current client results and performance, including measures of client progress called celeration efficiency; (2) define desired staff performance at the system, process, and individual levels; (3) measure and evaluate current staff performance at each level; (4) perform a data-based analysis of staff performance problems to identify their causes; (5) recommend solutions to staff performance problems with the best return on investment. |
Activities: This 2-hour workshop includes a workbook with practice materials, practice cards, a tool for evaluating client progress and staff performance, practice and discussion of the pragmatic supervision process, and counts toward the Behavior Analysis Certification Board continuing education requirements for supervisors. |
Audience: This workshop is for supervisors, staff trainers, and directors of educational and clinical organizations who serve students or clients with learning difficulties. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): analysis, evaluation, pragmatism, supervision |
|
|
The Application of the Behavior Analysis Certification Board's Ethics Code in Clinical and Academic Settings |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Forum GHIJ, Niveau 1 |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Barbara Metzger, Ph.D. |
BARBARA METZGER (Troy University) |
Description: In this workshop, participants will review key features of the Behavior Analysis Certification Board's ethics code and practice applying them with scenarios taken from clinical and academic settings. Participants will discuss their recommendations of ethical behavior based on the ethics code. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) describe key features of the behavior analysis certification board's ethics code; (2) practice applying the ethics code to real-life examples of ethical scenarios taken from clinical and academic settings; (3) provide recommendations for ethical behavior based on the ethics code. |
Activities: Workshop objectives will be met by brief presentation of the key features of the certification board's ethics code and presentation of ethical scenarios. Participants will break up into small groups to discuss the application of the ethics code by making recommendations for ethical behavior for resolving the dilemmas. |
Audience: Practitioners working in applied settings and academics who teach ethics to students. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
Making it Work: Ethical Considerations and Solutions for Behavior Analytic Supervision of Individuals Seeking Certification |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
11:30 AM–1:30 PM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Jennifer Yakos, M.A. |
JENNIFER YAKOS (Institute for Behavioral Training (IBT)), CECILIA KNIGHT (Institute for Behavioral Training) |
Description: As more individuals enter the field of Behavior Analysis, defining parameters for appropriate supervision to those seeking BCBA, BCaBA and RBT certification is an important topic of discussion. Specifically, our ethical codes, which define our responsibilities to our supervisees, as well as the public they serve, give rise to certain considerations that must be addressed regarding appropriate and ethical supervisory practices. Supervising a paid employee, providing remote on-line supervision to a student, or contracting with an international student who is not your employee are several examples of situations faced by BCBA supervisors which often present practical and ethical challenges. Furthermore, as BCBAs start to assess and then mentor RBTs, there are many unexplored areas of concern that a BCBA must consider; how many RBTs should a practitioner supervise while maintaining other responsibilities, how can a BCBA remotely assess RBT candidates with confidence, and what should a BCBA do when the RBTs performance in the workplace is subpar? This presentation will review ethical concerns that may arise in various supervisory situations as well as present solutions for BCBAs who are trying to provide ethical and appropriate supervision to those pursuing certification as BCBAs and BCaBAs, as well as those currently certified as an RBT. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: (1) identify several ethical issues which commonly arise within supervision of BCBA/BCaBA candidates and RBTs, including confidentiality, dual relationships and conflict of interest, scope of expertise and ensuring quality of service; (2) identify and discuss solutions to address common ethical dilemmas faced by BCBAs offering supervision to those seeking to gain and/or maintain certification; (3) identify specific factors that should be considered and addressed when deciding to commence supervision of a candidate; (4) identify and review components of effective behavior analytic supervision according to BACB guidelines. |
Activities: The workshop format will combine lecture, large group discussion, and small group breakout activities. |
Audience: This workshop would be appropriate for BCBAs providing behavior analytic supervision to students, educators, or other professionals seeking certification as a BCBA or BCaBA, as well as to individuals certified as RBTs. It would also be appropriate for those involved in the organization and arrangement of BCBA supervision for individuals. |
Content Area: Practice |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
|
From Functional Analyses to Interventions for Challenging Behavior |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
Forum Auditorium, Niveau 1 |
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Chata A. Dickson (New England Center for Children) |
Discussant: Richard B. Graff (The May Institute) |
CE Instructor: Richard B. Graff, Ph.D. |
Abstract: These two papers focus on the assessment and treatment of problem behavior. The first study, by Slaton, Hanley, and Raftery, compared results of interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses (Hanley, Jin, Vanselow, & Hanratty, 2014) and standard functional analyses (Iwata et al., 1982/1994) to determine differential outcomes of conducting functional analyses with synthesized versus isolated reinforcers. The relative effectiveness of interventions derived from both types of analyses was then evaluated. The second study, by Deltour, Ahearn, and Cohen, consisted of a trial-based functional analysis of problem behavior during activity transitions. A treatment based on the obtained results and consisting of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction was then implemented to decrease problem behavior occurring during the activity transitions identified as problematic. The discussant for this symposium will be Richard B. Graff, Ph.D., BCBA-D, who currently works at the New England Center for Children and whose research interests include, among others, the functional assessment and treatment of challenging behavior. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Actvity transitions, FCT, Synthesized FA, Trial-based FA |
|
A Comparison of Synthesized and Isolated Reinforcers in Functional Analysis |
JESSICA SLATON (Nashoba Learning Group), Gregory P. Hanley (Western New England University), Kate Raftery (Nashoba Learning Group) |
Abstract: Hanley, Jin, Vanselow, and Hanratty (2014) described a functional analysis (FA) model in which reinforcement contingencies identified via open-ended interviews with caregivers were combined in a single-test analysis. This interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA) was shown to provide an effective baseline from which to develop socially-validated treatments. However, the contingency synthesis prohibits an understanding of whether problem behavior is maintained by the interaction of contingencies or by one or more of the individual contingencies. We therefore compared results of IISCAs and standard FAs (Iwata et al., 1982/1994) to determine differential outcomes of conducting FAs with synthesized versus isolated reinforcers for nine children with autism. For five children, the IISCA yielded differentiated results and the standard FA did not; these data illustrate the importance of searching for interactions rather than or in addition to main effects of contingencies. When both analysis types were differentiated for four children, differential reinforcement-based treatments designed from each analysis were then compared. Problem behavior was decreased and alternative behavior was established during the IISCA-based treatment but not during the standard-analysis-based treatment for two children. The relative efficacy, efficiency, and treatment utility of the IISCA and standard FA will be discussed. |
|
Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior Occurring During Activity Transitions |
Clelia Deltour (New England Center for Children), William H. Ahearn (New England Center for Children), Stacy Cohen (Alternative Behavior), CHATA A. DICKSON (New England Center for Children) |
Abstract: Children with autism often present with difficulties during transitions (Davis, 1987). It is therefore important to develop procedures for assessing and treating problem behavior during transitions. The purpose of the present study was to replicate McCord, Thomson, and Iwata (2001) by developing and conducting an assessment and intervention for the transition-related problem behavior of two participants with disabilities. Following some pre-assessment analyses, we conducted a functional analysis of problem behavior during transitions between activities. The results suggested that problem behavior occurred in transitions involving a worsening in activity preference, for example terminating a preferred or neutral activity and initiating a non-preferred activity. Finally, we examined the effectiveness of an intervention consisting of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction on the problem behavior occurring during the transitions identified as problematic. The results suggested that differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction and effectively decreased problem behavior in all targeted activity transitions. Future directions will be discussed. Interobserver Agreement (IOA) was collected for at least 30% of all trials and averaged over 90% for all scored responses. |
|
|
|
|
Functional Communication Training: Caregiver Training and Use in Typical Settings |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
Scene DEF, Niveau 0 |
Area: DDA/AUT; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Jennifer N. Fritz (University of Houston-Clear Lake) |
CE Instructor: Jennifer N. Fritz, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Functional communication training (FCT) is a common treatment strategy for the reduction of problem behavior. Challenges can be encountered in teaching the procedures to caregivers in rural or ethnically diverse communities, as well as in the maintenance of treatment effects when reinforcement delays are necessary. Cordova, Phillips, Fritz, and Lerman used a train-the-trainer model to teach caregivers to train other caregivers to implement FCT with their children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Caregivers' integrity of implementation improved following training. Sellers, Hoffmann, and Bogoev used combined the train-the-trainer model with telehealth to teach caregivers to conduct a functional analysis implement FCT with their young children. A Board Certified Behavior Analyst? taught a behavior specialist to train caregivers in the procedures, and results showed this approach to be highly effective in reducing problem behavior and increasing independent comunication. Finally, Ghaemmaghami, Hanley, Jessel, Landa, and Ward compared time-based delays and contingency-based delays (CBD) following successful use of FCT. CBD was more effective, and most participants preferred unpredictable CBD compared to predictable CBD. Directions for future research and implications for clinical applications will be discussed. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): caregiver training, FCT, reinforcement delay, telehealth |
|
Improving Access to Care for Challenging Behavior Using a Parent-To-Parent Mentoring Approach |
Samantha Cordova (University of Houston-Clear Lake), Lauren Phillips (University of Houston-Clear Lake), JENNIFER N. FRITZ (University of Houston-Clear Lake), Dorothea C. Lerman (University of Houston-Clear Lake) |
Abstract: Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are more likely to engage in challenging behavior, such as aggression and self-injury, than children without ASD. If left untreated, these behaviors can increase in severity over time, causing significant stress on families. Numerous studies over the 30 years have demonstrated the efficacy of behavioral treatments for these challenging behaviors, particularly an intervention called functional communication training (FCT). Furthermore, caregivers have been able to effectively implement FCT in home settings to reduce their children's challenging behavior. However, all caregivers to date have been trained by professionals. The waiting lists to obtain these professional services can be quite lengthy, and these services are even less accessible to ethnically diverse, low-income families due to language and financial barriers. In this study, we evaluated a model of training in which caregivers trained by professionals then trained other parents to implement FCT with their children in the home setting. This model has the potential to expand clinical service availability in rural, low-income communities, as well as to more diverse ethnic groups who face barriers to receiving services for their childrens challenging behavior. |
|
Using Telehealth for Assessment & Intervention: Behavior Specialist as Coach & Caregivers as Implementers |
TYRA P. SELLERS (Utah State University), Audrey N. Hoffmann (Utah State University), Bistra Bogoev (Utah State University) |
Abstract: Researchers and clinicians have successfully demonstrated the use of telehealth in coaching parents to conduct functional analyses (FA) and subsequent functional communication training (FCT). We replicated and extended previous research by enlisting existing natural change agents to conduct FAs and FCT interventions via telehealth for children three years old and younger. Board Certified Behavior Analysts® (BCBA®)s trained and coached the existing behavior specialist via telehealth, who in turn trained and coached parents to conduct FAs and implement FCT in the community clinic setting. The function of challenging behavior was successfully identified for four participants. Challenging behavior reduced and the selected appropriate communication response increased for all participants. This study demonstrates that BCBAs can provide coaching and training, via telehealth, to less-trained behavior specialists to improve existing services provided through service programs, while minimizing potentially intrusive involvement of outside service providers. |
|
Efficacy of Contingency-Based Delay Tolerance Training and Preference for Predictable Versus Unpredictable Delays |
MAHSHID GHAEMMAGHAMI (University of the Pacific; Western New England University), Gregory P. Hanley (Western New England University), Joshua Jessel (Child Study Center), Robin K. Landa (Western New England University), Shannon Ward (Western New England University) |
Abstract: The effectiveness of treatments for problem behavior, like functional communication training (FCT), depends on the extent to which the treatment can be successfully extended to typical environments that include unavoidable and unpredictable reinforcement delays. Time-based delay (TBD) often result in loss of acquired communication responses and a re-emergence of problem behavior, whereas contingency-based delay (CBD) appears effective for increasing tolerance for delayed reinforcement (Hanley, Jin, Vanselow, & Hanratty, 2014). No direct comparison of TBD and CBD has been conducted, however. We first compared the relative efficacy of TBD and CBD across progressively longer delays using probabilistic reinforcement. Four individuals who engaged in a range of problem behaviors (e.g., aggression, vocal and motor disruptions, self-injury) participated. Lower rates of problem behavior and emotional responding were observed during CBD than TBD. We then evaluated the efficacy of, and participants’ preference for, predictable versus unpredictable CBD. Results from four participants showed that unpredictable CBD was more effective at maintaining optimal rates of communication, low rates of problem behavior, and high rates of compliance during delay. Unpredictable CBD, however, was preferred to predictable CBD and a control condition for three out of four participants. |
|
|
|
|
A Brief History of Basic Behavior-Analytic Research on Human Language and Cognition: From Skinner to Derived Relations and Beyond |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
2:00 PM–2:50 PM |
Scene AB, Niveau 0 |
Area: PCH; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Ph.D. |
Chair: Martha Costa Hubner (University of São Paulo) |
DERMOT BARNES-HOLMES (Ghent University) |
Dr. Dermot Barnes-Holmes received his D.Phil. in behavioral analysis and behavioral biology from the University of Ulster, Coleraine, N. Ireland. He currently serves as Senior Full Professor and Odysseus Laureate at Ghent University, Belgium, having previously served on the faculties of the National University of Ireland, Maynooth, and University College Cork. Dr. Barnes-Holmes is an extraordinarily prolific researcher who has made extensive contributions to the behavior analytic literature, especially in the areas of language and cognition. The competitive and prestigious Odysseus Laureate awarded to Dr. Barnes-Holmes in 2015 is just the most recent recognition of the esteem in which his work is held among behavioral scientists internationally. He contributed substantively to the development of Relational Frame Theory and has been a major source, either directly or through his more than 35 doctoral students, of the frequently cited empirical studies that support the theory. Since 1989, Dr. Barnes-Holmes has published 224 peer-reviewed articles, 40 book chapters, and 7 books or edited volumes. His work is known for its creativity and breadth in addressing complex questions about human language and cognition, with a coherent conceptual and methodological approach. This work has received more than �3.5 million in competitive funding since 2000, and has resulted in a number of prestigious awards and recognitions. |
Abstract: The history of basic research in behavior analysis on human language and cognition could be traced back to the publication of Skinner's (1957) Verbal Behavior and to the distinction that he made subsequently between contingency-shaped versus rule-governed behavior in An Operant Analysis of Problem Solving (Skinner, 1966). Although basic research studies were slow to emerge from the former work, the latter publication was critical in generating a whole plethora of studies that were directly relevant to the behavior analytic study of human language and cognition. The seminal research on equivalence relations by Sidman (1994) and colleagues, which commenced in the early 1970s and led to the development of relational frame theory (Hayes, Barnes-Holmes, & Roche, 2001), provided another critically important source of inspiration for basic research in this area. The current paper will present an overview of this 60-year-old unfolding research story and will consider some empirical and conceptual issues that appear to require focused attention as the story continues to unfold across the coming decades. |
Target Audience: Licensed behavior analysts, psychologists, graduate students. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, the participant will be able to: (1) provide a brief summary of the major milestones in the history of basic research in human language and cognition from a behavior-analytic perspective; (2) explain how Sidman’s research on equivalence relations clarified the concept “specification” in the area of rule-governed behavior; (3) articulate the definition of arbitrarily applicable relational responding and provide some simple examples of how it provides a behavior-analytic account of human language and cognition. |
|
|
|
|
Recent Translational Research on the Variables Controlling the Development, Maintenance, and Recurrence of Responding |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
2:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Loft GH, Niveau 3 |
Area: EAB; Domain: Translational |
Chair: Brian D. Greer (University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Discussant: Iser Guillermo DeLeon (University of Florida) |
CE Instructor: Brian D. Greer, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Bridging the basic and applied realms of behavior analysis, translational research seeks to determine the conditions under which basic principles of behavior control the behavior of humans in more typical contexts (e.g., home, school, and community settings), while also suggesting important areas for future basic research. The translational papers in this symposium examine the variables controlling the development, maintenance, and recurrence of target responding. Billie Retzlaff will begin this symposium by sharing the results of a recent translational investigation on the potential for the induction of additional functions of responding following synthesized contingencies of reinforcement. Hank Roane will then present on the role of response variability on the resurgence of problem behavior during challenges to treatment. Brian Greer will then present on strategies to mitigate the resurgence of problem behavior following functional communication training. Finally, Sarah Cowie will present on how reinforcers control behavior due to their ability to signal the immediate future probability of additional reinforcers. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): functional analysis, reinforcement, resurgence, treatment |
|
A Translational Investigation of the Potential for Induction of Additional Functions Following Synthesized Contingency Analyses |
(Applied Research) |
BILLIE RETZLAFF (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Wayne W. Fisher (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Jessica Akers (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Brian D. Greer (University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Abstract: Fisher, Greer, Romani, Zangrillo, and Owen (2016) compared the results of traditional functional analyses, where each potential putative reinforcer is evaluated individually, with results of a synthesized contingency analysis, where potential putative reinforcers are combined to create a single synthesized test condition. Results indicated that the synthesized contingency analysis produced false-positive outcomes for four of the five participants. These results also raise the possibility that combining potential putative reinforcers in a synthesized test condition may worsen problem behavior or induce novel functions of problem behavior. The presented study is a translational investigation designed to test whether exposure to synthesized contingencies can induce novel functions of behavior. An arbitrary response was established under the control of a specific establishing operation for each participant. We then conducted a traditional functional analysis of the arbitrary response and results indicated the response only occurred in the training context. Next we conducted a synthesized contingency analysis of the arbitrary response, and finally we conducted a second traditional functional analysis. Findings indicated both participants engaged in the arbitrary under more stimulus conditions following exposure to the synthesized contingency analysis. These findings are discussed in terms of current practices in functional assessment of problem behavior. |
|
Examination of Resurgence and Response Variability During Challenges to Treatment |
(Applied Research) |
William Sullivan (Dept. of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University
), Valdeep Saini (Dept. of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University
), Nicole M. DeRosa (Dept. of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University
), HENRY S. ROANE (Dept. of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University
) |
Abstract: Treatment of challenging behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities often involves withholding reinforcement for problem behavior (i.e., extinction) while simultaneously reinforcing an appropriate alternative behavior (i.e., differential reinforcement). Previous research has demonstrated that if reinforcement of the alternative behavior is reduced or eliminated (i.e., interruption of treatment), resurgence of problem behavior may occur. However, it is also possible that extinction-induced response variability (i.e., emergence of functionally related topographies of behavior) may also occur when reinforcement is withheld for previously reinforced responses. The current study sought to evaluate the occurrence of resurgence of problem behavior and extinction-induced response variability during a human operant arrangement in which an inactive control response was present and during clinical cases in which interruptions to treatment were programmed. Results suggested that resurgence and response variability may have an inverse relation when treatment is interrupted, such that if resurgence of problem behavior occurs, a child is less likely to display response variability and conversely, resurgence of problem behavior may not be as robust when a child engages in greater response variability. Clinical implications regarding the effects of treatment interruptions will be discussed. |
|
Strategies to Mitigate the Recurrence of Problem Behavior Following Functional Communication Training |
(Applied Research) |
Wayne W. Fisher (University of Nebraska Medical Center), BRIAN D. GREER (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Ashley Marie Fuhrman (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Valdeep Saini (Dept. of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University
), Christina Simmons (University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Abstract: Functional communication training (FCT) has strong empirical support for its use when treating socially reinforced problem behavior. However, treatment effects often deteriorate when FCT procedures are challenged, leading to the recurrence of problem behavior, decreased use of the functional communication response (FCR), or both (Mace et al., 2010; Volkert, Lerman, Call, & Trosclair-Lasserre, 2009; Wacker et al., 2011). Researchers have accordingly described a number of strategies to improve the efficacy of differential-reinforcement procedures (e.g., FCT) when challenged. For example, Wacker et al. (2011) assessed the maintenance of FCT-treatment effects by periodically exposing the FCR to periods of extinction and found that additional exposure to FCT helped guard against the disruptive impact of later periods of extinction. Basic researchers have described this and similar modifications to FCT procedures based on behavioral momentum theory (BMT) that should also help mitigate treatment relapse. Our research team has recently begun investigating these BMT-inspired modifications to FCT. In this presentation, I will share the results of our preliminary work in this area. |
|
Reinforcers Control Behaviour Because of What They Signal About the Immediate Future |
(Basic Research) |
SARAH COWIE (The University of Auckland, New Zealand
), Jessica Catherine McCormack (The University of Auckland, New Zealand
), Paula Hogg (The University of Auckland, New Zealand), Javier Virues Ortega (The University of Auckland, New Zealand
) |
Abstract: The assumption that reinforcers strengthen behavior forms the foundation of many behavior-analytic interventions. However, recent basic research suggests that reinforcers control behavior because of what they signal about events that are likely to occur in the immediate future, rather than because they strengthen the behavior they follow. We extended an experimental paradigm used with non-human animals to study reinforcer control of choice in children. Seven typically developing children and one child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder played a game where opening one of two drawers would result in a reinforcer. The probability of the next reinforcer being obtained for opening the same drawer as had produced the last reinforcer was varied across conditions. Generally, children chose the drawer more likely to produce the next reinforcer, even on occasions when a different response had been reinforced in the preceding trial. This finding suggests that strengthening may be an unnecessary construct, and that a better understanding of how appetitive consequences control behaviour may be achieved using an alternative framework. |
|
|
|
|
Expanding Access to Applied Behavior Analysis Services for People With Developmental Disabilities: A Public Policy Perspective |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Scene DEF, Niveau 0 |
Area: DDA/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Carmel Leonard, J.D. |
Chair: Carmel Leonard (Simmons) |
KATHERINE A. JOHNSON (Advances Learning Center) |
AMY WEINSTOCK (University of Massachusetts Medical School) |
Abstract: Expanding access to high quality Applied Behavior Analysis services has required advocacy for systems change, including expanding the payers for ABA to include health insurers. This panel will describe the public policy changes that have transformed access to ABA treatment. The panel will identify the future targets for public policy advocacy to break down the barriers to universal access to quality behavior analytic services. The presenters have drafted and passed legislation in Massachusetts requiring private health insurers to pay for autism treatment, specifically including applied behavior analysis. They have also participated in the drafting of the regulations to license behavior analysts in Massachusetts. One of the panelists is the founder of an agency providing ABA services to children and adults, and has expertise in managing the reimbursement process for ABA services. Another founded an agency to assist families accessing insurance reimbursement for ABA services. The third panelist has worked to expand access to non-English speaking residents to enable them to access services. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
|
|
|
|
Behavioral Skills Training: Effective Elements of Training in a Clinic, Home, and Community-Based Setting |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Studio AB, Niveau 2 |
Area: DDA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Stefanie Fillers (Apex Behavioral Consulting) |
CE Instructor: Stefanie Fillers, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The current symposium will highlight elements of behavioral skills training across varying environments. Rue and colleagues will present data regarding behavior analysts' ability to generalize training in experimental functional analysis (EFA) methodology to trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) methods. The training occurred in a clinic providing services to clients with developmental disabilities. Preliminary data suggest error patterns across the three participants requiring feedback to achieve acceptable levels of procedural integrity. Mitchell and colleagues discuss the importance of training supervisors to provide effective supervision to direct care staff in home-based programs. The authors designed a feedback tool that was used during weekly performance monitoring. Preliminary data suggest implementation of a feedback tool can be an effective means of training supervisors working in home-based applied behavior analysis (ABA) programs. The final presentation highlights elements of behavior skills training in a community setting. Smith and colleagues present data regarding a community-based program to increase access to community events and services for families that include an individual with a developmental disability. Results suggest community members acquired skills necessary to assist in providing increased access to community events. Presenters will include a discussion of the successes and challenges in training individuals to implement programs with integrity. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): Feedback, Training |
|
Functional Analysis: Generalization From Traditional to Trial-Based Analysis |
HANNA C. RUE (Autism Spectrum Therapies), Andrea L. Ridgway (Autism Spectrum Therapies), Tino LoVullo (Autism Spectrum Therapies) |
Abstract: Results of a recent survey of over 600 behavior analysts indicated only 77% received formal training in the use of experimental functional analysis (EFA). Further, 63% of board certified behavior analysts (BCBAs) indicated they "never" or "almost never" used an EFA in practice. The objective of the current study was to determine if BCBAs could generalize the ability to implement a trial-based experimental functional analysis (TBFA) following training focused on "traditional" EFA methodology. Three BCBAs with no experience implementing EFAs acted as participants in the study. The independent variable included formal training in EFA methodology. The dependent variable was level of procedural integrity during implementation of a traditional EFA and a TBFA measured in a multiple baseline design. Participants implemented the traditional EFAs during a mock assessment. Participants implemented the TBFAs in an applied setting with clients diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Initial results indicate that participants can implement traditional EFA methodology with relatively high levels of integrity. Results suggest two participants demonstrated challenges maintaining levels of integrity above 80% during the demand and control conditions. Participants will likely require additional feedback to maintain procedural integrity above 80% accuracy during TBFAs. Implications for training and practice are discussed. |
|
Training and Maintaining Supervision Skills: Use of a Direct, Systematic Feedback Tool to Increase Supervisor Skills and Performance |
STEFANIE FILLERS (Apex Behavioral Consulting), Katie Cullen (Apex Behavioral Consulting) |
Abstract: Effective and efficient supervision within the home setting can be a major challenge to Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) agencies. While the importance of quality supervision is well-known, many new supervisors are not provided formal supervision training. One well-documented method of ensuring quality supervision is regularly providing performance feedback to supervisees. The current study examined a method of improving supervisor performance using a systematic protocol and feedback tool. The participants of the study were two new home-program supervisors without formal supervision training. The dependent variable was their score on feedback form using a Likert-type scale which rated performance across supervision domains. Participants were given weekly, in person, performance evaluations from their supervisor. The weekly performance evaluation included a review of the feedback form, their score, and direct feedback on specific areas for improvement. Both participants scored in the moderate range during the baseline phase, which was anticipated based on their prior performance with the agency, and their overall familiarity with receiving regular feedback. As data collection continues, authors anticipate a gradual increase in performance scores and the ability to maintain supervision skills overtime. Results will be discussed in terms of improvement from baseline, maintenance of skills, and social validity. |
|
Training a Community: Increasing Access to Events and Services for Individuals With Developmental Disabilities |
JENNIFER D. SMITH (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center), Stephanie Weber (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center) |
Abstract: Families of children with developmental disabilities are often hesitant to participate in community activities, especially when there is a lack of essential supports. These families seek the same variety and flexibility to engage in their community as other members of society. The SOAR (Starting Our Adventure Right) program promotes safe, comfortable, and inclusive opportunities, combined with careful training and education of community members so that children with developmental disabilities and their families can fully participate within their own communities. The SOAR Program began as a collaboration between the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (DDBP) at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG), and the Autism Society of Greater Cincinnati. It has expanded to other community settings including museums and theaters. Psychologists and behavior analysts make use of elements of behavioral skills training, visual supports and a simulation event that focuses on modeling and feedback. Preliminary results from one training site suggests substantially increase in pre/post test scores of knowledge regarding developmental disabilities. It is anticipated that continued data collection and analysis will support the use of community training program to increase inclusion of individuals with developmental disabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Crew Resource Management and Situational Awareness: Behavioral Assessments and Interventions |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: OBM/CBM; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Mark P. Alavosius, Ph.D. |
Chair: Steven Anbro (University of Nevada Reno) |
MARK P. ALAVOSIUS (Praxis2LLC) |
PIERRE BORDAGE (Schlumberger, Ltd) |
RAMONA HOUMANFAR (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: Crew resource Management (CRM) describes an approach to coordinating the efforts of multiple personnel to optimize behavior within complex and challenging work environments. It is crucial in high risk industries such as aviation, nuclear power, oil & gas exploration and medicine, for examples, where teams must manage complex tasks within highly technical environments. Situational Awareness (SA) can be seen as a subset of CRM and entails a worker or crew perceiving changes in the operating environment, comprehending the significance of those changes, and predicting what will happen if events continue unchecked. SA in the context of CRM is an early step in a chain of coordinated behaviors (decision-making, communications, instructions, coaching, feedback, etc.) that allow teams to adapt their collective response to challenges and avert catastrophic outcomes. This panel considers the complexity of behaviors within the CRM and SA framework. Issues such as measuring crew and individual competency, the value of simulators in training, and design of support systems (dashboards, data streams, etc.) are discussed in the context of work underway in oil & gas exploration and medical settings. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): CRM, Dashboards, Situational Awareness |
|
|
|
|
The Growing Impact of Behavioral Science on Cultural Evolution |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Scene AB, Niveau 0 |
Area: PCH; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Anthony Biglan, Ph.D. |
Chair: Maria E. Malott (Association for Behavior Analysis International) |
ANTHONY BIGLAN (Oregon Research Institute) |
Anthony Biglan, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist at Oregon Research Institute. He is the author of The Nurture Effect: How the Science of Human Behavior Can Improve our Lives and Our World. Dr. Biglan has been conducting research on the development and prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior for the past 30 years. His work has included studies of the risk and protective factors associated with tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use; high-risk sexual behavior; and antisocial behavior. He has conducted numerous experimental evaluations of interventions to prevent tobacco use both through school-based programs and community-wide interventions. And, he has evaluated interventions to prevent high-risk sexual behavior, antisocial behavior, and reading failure. In recent years, his work has shifted to more comprehensive interventions that have the potential to prevent the entire range of child and adolescent problems. He and colleagues at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences published a book summarizing the epidemiology, cost, etiology, prevention, and treatment of youth with multiple problems (Biglan et al., 2004). He is a former president of the Society for Prevention Research. He was a member of the Institute of Medicine Committee on Prevention, which released its report in 2009 documenting numerous evidence-based preventive interventions that can prevent multiple problems. As a member of Oregon�s Alcohol and Drug Policy Commission, he is helping to develop a strategic plan for implementing comprehensive evidence-based interventions throughout Oregon. Information about Dr. Biglan�s publications can be found at http://www.ori.org/scientists/anthony_biglan. |
Abstract: In the pastseventy years, the behavioral sciences achieved knowledge of human behavior and cultural evolution that is beginning to reap significant benefits in terms of improving human well-being. This presentation will provide a brief overview of the knowledge we have gained with special emphasis on the behavior analytic roots of much of that progress. Dr. Biglan will then provide specific and diverse examples of how effective interventions are being implemented around the world at a scale that is beginning to affect the well-being of entire populations. |
Target Audience: Licensed behavior analysts, psychologists, graduate students |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants should be able to: (1) describe or identify how the onset of new learned reinforcers (i.e., conditioned reinforcers) establish verbal behavior developmental cusps; (2) define how the terms transformation of stimulus function apply to learning to spell words across saying and writing; (3) explain how children who have demonstrated learning the names of things incidentally (presence of the bi-directional naming cusp) can be taught differently than children who do not demonstrate this verbal behavior developmental cusp; (4) describe or identify accurate statements concerning Greer’s argument that, “if you build reinforcers the behaviors will come;” (5) explain the importance of social reinforcers in verbal behavior development. |
|
|
|
|
Early Social Communication Skills for Children With Autism |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Scene C, Niveau 0 |
Area: AUT/VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Tracy Raulston (University of Oregon) |
CE Instructor: Sarah Grace Hansen, Ph.D. |
Abstract: A core-defining feature of autism spectrum disorder is deficits in social communication skills. As such, early interventions often target this area of development. This symposium will present empirical data related to early social communication targets that are critical for social conversation development. The first two single case research studies evaluate teaching procedures for two commonly addressed early social communication targets (i.e., joint attention and intraverbal fill-ins). The final study presents a meta-analysis of declarative and imperative communication acts for young children with autism. |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Keyword(s): autism, social communication, verbal behavior |
|
Peer Mediated Classroom Based Joint Attention Intervention |
SARAH GRACE HANSEN (Georgia State University), Tracy Raulston (University of Oregon), Wendy A. Machalicek (University of Oregon) |
Abstract: Inclusive preschool settings often provide meaningful social and play opportunities with same aged peers for children with special needs. Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are especially at risk for isolation from peers in inclusive preschool settings and have benefited from a range of social communication interventions. In particular, peer mediated interventions hold interest for social communication interventions for children with ASD because of their ability to teach skills that are socially valid. One pivotal skill for social interactions, joint attention, has been examined primarily in clinical settings. This study extends previous findings from a piloted parent-mediated joint attention intervention and applies joint attention interventions to a peer-mediated setting in an individual concurrent multiple baseline design across child-peer dyads in inclusive preschool classrooms to evaluate the effects of the intervention on increased response to joint attention behaviors to interventionist bids; on increased bids from peers to target children with ASD; and on increased response to joint attention behaviors to peer bids. Elements of discrete trial training (DTT) and naturalistic instruction were used to teach response to joint attention behaviors to young children with ASD using both interventionists and same-aged peers. Results indicate increased response to both interventionist and peer joint attention bids, as well as increased peer bids to target child. |
|
|
|
|
Establishing Sustainable ABA Services Abroad |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Studio F, Niveau 2 |
Area: CSS/AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Daniel Gould, Ph.D. |
Chair: Daniel Gould (New England Center for Children - Abu Dhabi) |
VINCENT STRULLY (New England Center for Children) |
PAMELA OLSEN (The New England Center for Children - Abu Dhabi) |
JOSHUA K. PRITCHARD (Florida Institute of Technology) |
Abstract: The increasing dissemination of Behavior Analysis services around the world, particularly in the area of autism intervention, presents unique opportunities and challenges for program developers and practitioners alike. As more and more governments recognize the need for effective autism treatment and commit resources to intervention based on applied behavior analysis, opportunities are created. Successful programs operating abroad have goals in common with programs operating in North America, but they also must address some unique challenges. First, they must provide effective, evidence-based treatment that meets local needs. Consideration of the local cultural context and cultural influences on the recognition, acceptable interventions, and expected outcomes of disabilities services will help mitigate program-related risks associated with operation abroad. Second, program operation must be financially viable and sustainable. An understanding of the local stakeholders (e.g., government, philanthropic) commitment to program funding and operation over an extended time is critical. Third, a successful program will plan for sustainability through knowledge transfer, that is, through the development of local expertise among practitioners and program managers through formal and informal professional development. Panelists will discuss these three key topics and answer questions about the development and delivery of services abroad. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): program development, service-delivery, sustainability |
|
|
|
|
Heart and Soul |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Scene AB, Niveau 0 |
Area: PCH; Domain: Theory |
CE Instructor: Peter R. Killeen, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jack Marr (Georgia Tech) |
PETER R. KILLEEN (Arizona State University) |
Dr. Peter Killeen is professor of psychology at Arizona State University, and has also been visiting scholar at the University of Texas, Cambridge University, and the Centre for Advanced Study, Oslo. He is a Fellow of the Society of Experimental Psychologists, has held a Senior Scientist Award from the National Institute of Mental Health, has been president of the Society for the Quantitative Analyses of Behavior (from which organization he appropriately received the Poetry in Science Award in 2002), held the American Psychological Association F. J. McGuigan Lectureship on Understanding the Human Mind, and received the Ernest and Josephine Hilgard Award for the Best Theoretical Paper (Killeen & Nash, 2003). Dr. Killeen has made many highly innovative and fundamental contributions to the experimental and quantitative analysis of behavior. His major work includes the development of incentive theory, culminating in the mathematical principles of reinforcement (Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1994), and the behavioral theory of timing (Psychological Review, 1988). He is the author of 80 peer-reviewed papers, many of which have been heavily cited. He has served on the boards of editors of the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Behavioural Processes, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Psychological Review, Brain & Behavioral Functions, and Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews. Dr. Killeen's quantitative and conceptual developments have enriched behavior analysis and the world beyond. |
Abstract: Words that mean so much to all of us–either as the center of our meaningful existence–or as four-letter words writ large. Blaise Pascal understood that, “The heart has reasons that Reason cannot know.” “And needn’t know!” is quickly echoed by radical behaviorists. Here, in the City of Love, I ask if they could possibly be right; whether to be a good science, ours must be a heartless science. Physics and chemistry cannot be other. Must behaviorism? Bemused with Carneaux in experimental chambers, is there room for behaviorists in the labyrinthine chambers of the heart? In this talk I begin to unweave the rainbow of heart and soul; hoping–and you shall judge if I succeed in showing the possibility–that once experimentally analyzed, some reasons can be found that reason can know; and that some life, indeed, some mystery, still lives in the analysands. |
Target Audience: Licensed behavior analysts, psychologists, graduate students. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) explain how love is a hypothetical construct; (2) explain how love is an emotion constructed out of affect and context; (3) explain how to find love. |
|
|
|
|
Development of Competent Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA) |
Tuesday, November 14, 2017 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Forum ABC, Niveau 1 |
Area: PRA/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Dana Garner, Ph.D. |
Chair: Dana Garner (Penn State
Garner Behavior Services, LLC) |
CHERICE R. CARDWELL (Association Francaise Les Professionnels de l'Anal) |
NICOLE TURON-DIAZ (Learning By Design, LLC) |
Abstract: This panel will briefly review ethical supervision of BACB applicants based on the BACB Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts. Supervised experience provides BACB applicants with guidance in the application of behavior analytic procedures. Panel will discuss the importance of ethical, effective and efficient supervision of BACB applicants and how the supervised experience lays the groundwork for provision of home programming services once applicants become certified BCBAs. Panel will also briefly discuss ethics as they relate to the provision of delivering home programming services to clients and respond to questions from the audience. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): supervision, consultation |
|
|
|
|
Early Intervention is All Grown Up: Applying Evidence-Based Individualized Interventions in Group Settings to Adolescents and Adults Across the Autism Spectrum |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
8:00 AM–8:50 AM |
Forum GHIJ, Niveau 1 |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Cecilia Knight (Institute for Behavioral Training) |
CE Instructor: Allison Jones, M.S. |
Abstract: The efficacy of Applied Behavior Analysis in treating young children with autism in one-to-one settings has been well-established in research, but what happens when those children grow into adolescence and adulthood? For many teens and adults on the spectrum, continued life-long services are critical to creating independent and happy lives, and a change in approach is essential. At Project HOPE Foundation, these needs are being addressed in a variety of ways. Hope ALIVE provides group services to young adults on the spectrum with the goals of building independence and gaining meaningful employment; Hope ALIVE Junior provides a classroom for adolescents focusing on life skills, communication, reduction of severe maladaptive behavior, community engagement, and preparation for the vocational and service options that students will face as adults; and Bridging the Gap utilizes Applied Behavior Analysis in classrooms that focus on traditional academics as well as social skills and classroom readiness. These programs apply evidence-based individualized interventions in group settings to adolescents and adults across the autism spectrum in innovative ways to continue to meet their changing needs. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): adolescence, adult services, classroom settings, non-traditional applications |
|
Hope ALIVE: Expanding Academics, Life Skills, Interests, Vocational Skills, and Experiences for Adults on the Autism Spectrum Through Applied Behavior Analysis |
Allison Jones (Project HOPE Foundation, Inc.), MARK KNIGHT (Hope Reach) |
Abstract: Hope ALIVE transfers the principles of Applied Behavior Analysis to a group setting to help participants build independence and gain meaningful employment. Hope ALIVE focuses on Academics, Life skills, Interests, Vocational Opportunities, and Experiences, while using evidence-based principles to prompt, shape, and reinforce new and growing skills, and to reduce the occurrence of maladaptive behaviors that serve as a barrier to successful outcomes. This innovative program applies the well-documented techniques and principles of Applied Behavior Analysis in a group setting with young adults; participants have shown measurable and significant progress. Although the vast majority of behavior analytic services available to people on the autism spectrum serve young children, the principles of behavior apply to adults, as well. Hope ALIVE seeks to expand the vast base of research in ABA to help young adults achieve greater independence, meaningful employment, and happy lives. |
|
Expanding Classroom Models for Adolescents Across the Autism Spectrum Using Applied Behavior Analysis |
MARK KNIGHT (Hope Reach), Allison Jones (Project HOPE Foundation, Inc.), Andrea Hudspeth (Hope Reach) |
Abstract: The efficacy of Applied Behavior Analysis in therapy for children with autism is well established, but the transfer of ABA into classrooms is critical. By shifting learning from one-on-one therapy to a more natural group setting, ABA classroom options pave the way for successful transition into adult life. Project HOPE Foundation employs ABA in a variety of classroom models, both inclusion-based and autism-specific. Bridging the Gap is an ABA educational program with classrooms ranging from preschool through high school, emphasizing group and social skills within a classroom environment along with an individualized curriculum approach to teaching academics. Classroom experiences are supplemented with life skills instruction and pre-vocational experiences. Hope Alive Junior targets children with more severe challenges with communication, social interaction, and problem behavior. This program uses ABA to build peer relationships, encourage group interaction, and develop community engagement. Students work in a variety of venues – classroom, specially designed life skills house, and the community at large – to foster communication and independence. |
|
|
|
|
Temporal Control: A Spencean Model, Its Strengths and Limitations |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
8:00 AM–8:50 AM |
Scene AB, Niveau 0 |
Area: EAB; Domain: Basic Research |
CE Instructor: Armando Machado, Ph.D. |
Chair: Peter R. Killeen (Arizona State University) |
ARMANDO MACHADO (University of Minho) |
Dr. Armando Machado obtained his Ph.D. in 1993 from Duke University. His doctoral research examined the conditions in which pigeons generate highly variable, random-like behavior, and received a Behavior Analysis Dissertation Award from Division 25. Dr. Machado currently teaches and conducts research at the University of Minho in the north of Portugal, where he continues to study a variety of issues related to behavior and learning (e.g., time and number discrimination, choice). His studies contrast the results of laboratory experiments with the predictions of simple mathematical models of behavior and learning. In addition to the psychology of learning, Dr. Machado's interests include mathematics, evolutionary biology, philosophy, and the history of psychology. His work has been funded by the National Institutes of Mental Health (USA) and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and published in Animal Cognition, Behavioural Processes, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, and others. He has served as the program chair and president for the Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior, and as president of the Portuguese Association of Experimental Psychology. |
Abstract: Dr. Machado willpresent a Spencean, synthetic approach to interval timing in animals, an approach grounded on the hypothesis that temporal generalization gradients may combine to produce complex forms of behavior. The hypothesis is instantiated by the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model. First,he will review how LeT accounts for the generalization gradients obtained in prototypical timing procedures. Then,he will show how, by combining these gradients, LeT accounts for more complex data and some surprising findings. Finally,he will discuss some current obstacles to our understanding of timing, including the boundary conditions of generalization gradients, the possibility of inhibitory temporal gradients, and how temporal memories are created, accessed, and retrieved. |
Target Audience: Licensed behavior analysts, psychologists, graduate students. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe the main behavioral properties of temporal generalization gradients; (2) describe how, using a Spencean approach, these gradients may be combined to explain more complex behavior; (3) explain how some laboratory findings related to temporal performance challenge our theoretical understanding of timing. |
|
|
|
|
Build a Better Mousetrap: An Innovative Public School Applied Behavior Analysis Hybrid Model |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
8:00 AM–8:50 AM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: OBM/EDC; Domain: Translational |
CE Instructor: Leaora L. Wagner, M.A. |
Chair: Richard E. Laitinen (Peronalized Accelerated Learning Systems (PALS)) |
LEAORA L. WAGNER (Sarah Dooley Center for Autism) |
SARA GARBARINI (David Gregory School) |
ADAM DREYFUS (Sarah Dooley Center for Autism) |
Abstract: Panelists will discuss how they implemented a clinically sound Applied Behavior Analytic (ABA) public school hybrid model in a failing private day school serving children diagnosed with Autism and Intellectual Disability. The failing school had parents who were outraged with the programming, along with funding agents and public school liaisons removing students at alarming rates. Panelists will highlight the implementation of structured teaching, verbal behavior interventions, the use of technology, fidelity checklists, and Organizational Behavior Management methodology that increased the goals met by 430% and a data collection system that last resulted in over 1.6 million data points gathered and graphically displayed. Unlike many ABA-based schools, , the Sarah Dooley Center is modeled on the look, rhythm and feel of a public school which has resulted in a tremendous increase in students being transferred back to their local public schools. We have also partially implemented a cloud-based verbal curriculum. Results of on-going studies on the efficiency and efficacy of cloud-based assessment, instruction and curricula will be discussed. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): OBM, Special Education, Technology, Verbal Behavior |
|
|
|
|
Establishing Early Social Skills in Young Children At Risk of Autism and Developmental Disorders via Operant Learning Procedures |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
8:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Forum Auditorium, Niveau 1 |
Area: AUT/DDA; Domain: Translational |
Chair: Martha Pelaez (Florida International University) |
Discussant: Per Holth (Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences) |
CE Instructor: Hayley Neimy, M.S. |
Abstract: We have initiated, replicated, and extended a programmatic line of research for establishing operant procedures to investigate infant learning and to help young children who are at risk for developing autism or other developmental disorders acquire social repertoires. Infant engagement responses such as vocalizations, eye contact, joint attention, and social referencing are critical developmental milestones that serve as prerequisites for early communication and social skills (Pelaez, 2009). The emphasis in this symposium is that operant learning procedures can be successful in establishing early social-learning repertoires. The first presenter identifies the early behavioral indicators of at-risk infants. She examines the typical infant operant responses studied (e.g., vocalizations, gaze, kicking, smiles, gaze away) and the social conditioned reinforcers used (e.g., adult smiles, touch, nods, cooing, imitating, picking up) in the study of infant social learning. The presenter highlights the operant-learning procedures that have been useful in investigating infant phenomena like mother-infant attachment, acquisition of fears, joint attention, social referencing, and early communication. The second presentation analyzes previous research on behavioral procedures used to establish infant eye contact using a synchronized reinforcement procedure. The third presentation reviews existing research on procedures using two forms of social reinforcement (adult vocal imitation and motherese speech) for increasing early vocalizations among infants and young children. The fourth presentation examines the acquisition of joint-attention and social referencing repertoires via the operant-learning paradigm among typically and atypically developing infants and toddlers. The discussant will comment on these ongoing programs of research and future directions and implications of the research. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): at risk, child development, infants, social skills |
|
Operant-Learning Procedures With Infants |
(Applied Research) |
MARTHA PELAEZ (Florida International University) |
Abstract: Operant conditioning procedures have been used very effectively to investigate infant social learning (Gewirtz & Pelaez, 1992; Novak & Pelaez, 2004; Pelaez, Virues, & Gewirtz, 2011, 2012). Infants and young children who are at risk of developing autism or other developmental disorders can benefit from early interventions that use operant principles and procedures (Neimy, et al., in press). In this presentation we will identify the early behavioral indicators of at-risk infants; examine the typical infant operant responses studied (e.g., vocalizations, eye gaze, kicking, smiles, gaze away) and discuss the conditioned social reinforcers often used in the study of infant social learning (e.g., adult smiles, touch, nods, cooing, imitating, picking up). We will highlight the infant phenomena that has been studied, including mother-infant attachment, the effects of maternal depression on infant learning, the acquisition of fears, joint attention, social referencing, and early learning of imitation. |
|
Improving Eye Contact Among Infants and Toddlers at Risk of Developmental Disorders With Synchronized Reinforcement Procedure |
(Applied Research) |
JACQUELINE MERY-CARROW (Caldwell University), Martha Pelaez (Florida International University), Jonathan J. Tarbox (FirstSteps for Kids; University of Southern California) |
Abstract: Parents can successfully increase engagement behaviors such as eye contact and positive affect with young children at risk of autism and other developmental disorders. This presentation reviews and discusses a synchronized reinforcement procedure, described by Pelaez and colleagues (1996), that can strengthen infant eye contact. The procedure includes brief parental training where mothers are taught to provide simultaneous behaviors such as smiling, verbal praise, and rhythmic touch contingently to reinforce infant eye contact in the natural environment. The assumptions is that establishing eye contact in young children can aid the learning of other foundational skills required to build social communicative behaviors. The current presentation stresses the importance of establishing contingencies of reinforcement during mother-child interactions. |
|
Promoting Early Vocalizations Among Infants and Toddlers Using Contingent Social Reinforcement |
(Applied Research) |
HAYLEY NEIMY (Shabani Institute), Martha Pelaez (Florida International University), Jonathan J. Tarbox (FirstSteps for Kids; University of Southern California) |
Abstract: The emission of vocalizations during early infancy serves as the preverbal foundation for the development of subsequent functional language skills later in childhood (Novak & Pelaez, 2004). Research that facilitates the acquisition of these preverbal skills is presented. The research illustrates the use of two forms of contingent social reinforcement (maternal vocal imitation and motherese speech) as effective means for increasing the rate of infant vocalizations (Pelaez et al., 2011a; 2011b, Neimy, et. al., in press). The current presentation reviews, analyzes, and extends previous literature on the use of both contingent and noncontingent vocal imitation and motherese speech on increasing the rate of infant vocalizations among typically and atypically developing infants through a parent-training model. The presenter concludes that establishing pre-verbal vocalizations may help facilitate the development of subsequent verbal vocalizations among at risk infants and potentially mitigate language delays in later childhood. |
|
Establishing Joint Attention Skills to Facilitate Social Referencing Repertoires in Infants and Toddlers via Operant Learning Procedures |
(Applied Research) |
KATERINA MONLUX (Stanford University), Martha Pelaez (Florida International University), Jonathan J. Tarbox (FirstSteps for Kids; University of Southern California) |
Abstract: Deficits in social engagement are among the main developmental problems observed among children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In particular, joint attention and social referencing skills are critical for the development of more complex social interactions. The use of behavioral techniques and brief parent-infant engagement training has shown to be successful in promoting these social skills. Our assumption is that targeting joint attention and social referencing skills in the natural environment by using caregivers as therapists can potentially mitigate and prevent the development of later onset behavior language problems commonly associated with ASD. The current presentation reviews and extends previously published procedures for the training of joint attention and social referencing modeled after Pelaez and colleagues’ (2012) operant learning paradigm. Further, a model for expanding previous findings to the natural environment is proposed where joint attending skills can be taught first to aid in the acquisition of social referencing. While very similar social behavior chains, joint attention and social referencing have functional differences. Specifically, social referencing adds another component to the joint attention chain where the learner reacts to the novel stimulus in a manner that is in accordance with another’s facial expressions or emotional cues. |
|
|
|
|
Transformation in Medical Education: A New Frontier for Behavioral Systems Analysis |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
8:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Studio F, Niveau 2 |
Area: CSS/OBM; Domain: Translational |
Chair: Ramona Houmanfar (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Discussant: Maria E. Malott (Association for Behavior Analysis International) |
CE Instructor: Ramona Houmanfar, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Through recent empirical work in behavioral systems analysis, behavior analysis is increasingly placing itself in a position to theorize effectively and test empirically educated guesses about the functioning of leadership decision making in organizations. Change in complex organizations such as medical schools is a challenging and lengthy process. In their role as guides, leaders create new verbal relations between the current and future state of the organization, and between the future organization and its niche in the future environment. On the other hand, by recognizing individuals' implicit responding and values, leaders can design and implement effective organizational contingencies that promote wellness and effective team dynamics. This symposium will outline the collaborative efforts of the School of Medicine and Behavior Analysis Program at the University of Nevada, Reno. Presentations will highlight the creation, and adoption of behavior analytic assessments and interventions throughout an organization-wide curricular restructuring at the School of Medicine. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): behavioral systems, burnout, interprofessional communication |
|
Integrating a Behavior Analytic Framework into a School of Medicine's Strategic Planning Process |
(Applied Research) |
MELISSA PATRICIA PIASECKI (UNR Med), Carolyn Brayko (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: In 2012, the University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine (UNR Med) adopted a behavioral analytics framework to guide a number of change processes including curricular restructuring. Over the following few years, this framework was also applied to faculty development and the creation of a new office for continuous institutional assessment. In the context of significant state wide changes in medical education, we extended our behavioral analytical framework for strategic planning. Over the course of one year we applied an iterative approach to institution-wide strategic planning that relied upon data-based decision making and continuous feedback loops. The process produced a systemic plan to guide us through our next phase of development. The newly articulated direction of UNR Med will be actualized through both strong leadership and by engaging the entire school of medicine community. Re-evaluating institutional goals and objectives will facilitate UNR Meds effective interaction with larger metacontingencies of healthcare and medical education in the state of Nevada. |
|
Burnout of Medical Students: An Epidemic on the Rise |
(Applied Research) |
Thomas L. Schwenk (University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine), MELISSA PATRICIA PIASECKI (UNR Med) |
Abstract: Despite having seemingly greater access to medical and mental health care, as well as medical and behavioral knowledge, medical students and residents suffer from a higher prevalence of depression than do age-matched controls, and physicians have a higher risk of suicide than the general population. The prevalence of depression in medical students and residents appears to have increased over the last 20 years. The prevalence of burnout, a different but related construct to depression, is roughly 50% in all recent studies of medical students and physicians. Depression, if undiagnosed and untreated, is associated with cognitive dysfunction, loss of empathy, professional dysfunction and low esteem, and suicide risk. Burnout is associated with exhaustion, depersonalization, low professional satisfaction and unethical professional behaviors.These data areof great concernto medical educators,and are considered one of the major challenges facing medical education today. This concern is leading to new approaches to assessment, building resilience, eliminating the stigma of seeking diagnosis and treatment, and reducing adverse educational environments, requiring new tools for enhancing self-awareness, providing measurable feedback on behavioral changes, and developing new approaches to teaching. |
|
A Behavioral Systems Approach Toward Assessing and Alleviating Burnout Among Medical Students |
(Applied Research) |
ALISON SZARKO (University of Nevada, Reno), Ramona Houmanfar (University of Nevada, Reno), Nicole Jacobs (University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine), Gregory Scott Smith (Chrysalis, Inc.; University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine), Carolyn Brayko (University of Nevada, Reno), Mary Froehlich (University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine) |
Abstract: The rising epidemic of burnout among medical students has led to an increased interest in medical schools seeking curricular elements that can increase student resilience. Although wellness programs have been developed nationwide to address the needs of student’s mental health, stigmatization of seeking help and students’ compact schedules have led to consistently low rates of students actively taking advantage of the services provided. By using a curriculum-based intervention, all medical students are taught skills to prevent burnout and depression when the inevitable stressors set in. Understanding the implications of behavioral assessment tools (i.e. the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedures; IRAP) and the effects of behavioral interventions, such as, Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACTraining), are necessary steps toward the active prevention and understanding of burnout in a medical school setting. This presentation will discuss the development of modules teaching six essential components of ACTraining as a potential means of decreasing the likelihood of medical student burnout. A variation of the IRAP has been developed to specifically meet the needs of a medical school population. The variation of the IRAP and measures taken from it to assess burnout will also be discussed and explained from a behavior analytic perspective as a means of assessing the effectiveness of an ACTraining approach. |
|
An Interprofessional Approach to the Training and Assessment of Interprofessional Communication With Medical and Nursing Students |
(Applied Research) |
AMBER MARIE MARACCINI (Renown Health), Ramona Houmanfar (University of Nevada, Reno), Anthony Slonim (Renown Health), Melissa Patricia Piasecki (UNR Med) |
Abstract: Preventable adverse events have been identified as the nation's third leading cause of death in the United States. Faulty teamwork and communication amongst healthcare providers has been identified as the root cause of such adverse events. To enhance teamwork, communication, andas a resultpatient safety, the incorporation of interprofessional education (IPE) into healthcare training has been advised. Introduced in June 2011, the I-PASS handoff bundle curriculum is one evidence-based technology currently used in IPE settings. Interprofessional teams who have completed the I-PASS handoff curriculum demonstrate improved communication, coordination, and leadership skills within groups. One component that remains missing, however, is the psychological training of individual values and perspective-taking skills. Within behavior analysis, a methodology known as ACTraining exists to address these psychological deficits. Given this information, the current study implemented a comprehensive IPE programbased on the I-PASS curriculum, ACTraining literature, and descriptive analytic measurement methodsinto a medical and nursing school. Behavioral assessment procedures (e.g., simulated patient handoffs) and measures related to interprofessional communication were taken before, during, and after exposure to the curriculum intervention. |
|
|
|
|
Behavior Analysis to Assist the Military |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: CBM/CSS; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Laurie Dickstein-Fischer (Assistant Professor & Program Coordinator for School Counseling
School of Education
Salem State University) |
Discussant: Karola Dillenburger (Queen's University Belfast) |
CE Instructor: Darlene E. Crone-Todd, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Armies across the world have used both respondent and operant conditioning in initial training and task implementation for millennia. However, no military organization credits its use of such conditioning in the training of its troops. Grossman (On Killing, 1996), in his retrospective analysis of training is one of the very rare authors who stated that the US Army and Marine Corps rely on applications of the conditioning techniques of Pavlov and Skinner. The transition back to civilian life can prove difficult for those who have been deployed. The two studies presented here and their analyses are grounded in behavior analysis and standard celeration chart methodology. One presentation reports data from the US Air Force on suicide issues with deployed and returning troops. It also gives the estimated occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in all branches of the US military. Salem State University (Massachusetts, US) has implemented a program to assist returning military veterans with university success through the use of SAFMEDS cards (Say All Fast, Minute Every Day, Shuffled). Conclusions from both studies lead to the importance of using behavior analysis, both respondent and operant, with deployed and returning troops. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): celeration chart, military veterans, SAFMEDS, suicide |
|
Suicide and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Prevention in the Military |
Kent A. Corso (NCR Behavioral Health, LLC), ABIGAIL B. CALKIN (Calkin Consulting Center), James Meador (Xcelerate Innovations, LLC; graduate student), Michael Kondis (Xcelerate Innovations, LLC.) |
Abstract: Suicide, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are some of the current issues the US military. Even though US military suicides occur less frequently in the Air Force, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard than in the Army, data from the US Air Force is the most detailed and complete. All data, however, show that suicide remains an issue among US troops. Suicide rates have increased since deployments that came after 2001. PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) estimates remain about the same for troops returning from Vietnam and from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, that is, between 18% and 25% of the returning veterans whether they are active duty, National Guard or reservists have PTSD. This presentation will include data displays from all branches of the US military and will include suicide, PTSD, and TBI data. |
|
A Behavior-Based Intervention for Military Veteran University Students |
DARLENE E. CRONE-TODD (Salem State University) |
Abstract: Adjusting to an academic environment is challenging for many students, and especially the veteran student population. Transitions from military service to civilian life are often difficult due to a shifting role in identity and in the structure of the environments. Layering the challenges of beginning a new academic career and beginning their life as a student can be overwhelming. The goal of the current study was to provide students with a way to structure their time to become more effective at studying, and thus help with the adaptation to university. A series of workshops was developed that include instruction and practice using SAFMEDs (Say All Fast, Minute Each Day, Shuffled) and the PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Recite, Reflect, and Review) method. In this presentation, SAFMEDs fluency data will be presented along with an evaluation of the complexity of questions developed using the PQ4R method. In addition, discussion of longitudinal plans for evaluating and extending the workshop program will be included. |
|
|
|
|
The Language of Philosophy, Research, and Practice |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Loft B, Niveau 3 |
Area: PCH/VBC; Domain: Translational |
Chair: Mitch Fryling (California State University, Los Angeles) |
Discussant: Peter R. Killeen (Arizona State University) |
CE Instructor: Mitch Fryling, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Scientists talk in a variety of ways. Some scientists primarily participate in philosophical discourse, whereas others may focus on research, and still others primarily apply the science in practice settings. By and large, workers in these different areas tend to speak in different ways, and this is likely related to their different aims. The present symposium involves two presentations which directly address ways of speaking about events in science, including common confusions engendered by different ways of speaking, and ways in which progress may be both stunted and enhanced by these different ways of speaking. The first presentation focuses on the relationship between philosophical discourse and investigation specifically, calling into question the extent to which philosophical discourse amounts to nothing more than talk and no action. The second presentation focuses on the relationship between theory and practice, and specifically, the extent to which different ways of speaking about different practices can both compromise and strengthen scientific progress. A discussant will provide commentary on these issues. It is hoped that attention to these topics will stimulate further conceptual work, research, and practice in the field of behavior analysis. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
All Talk and No Action? |
(Theory) |
LINDA J. PARROTT HAYES (University of Nevada, Reno) |
Abstract: Sciences subjected to formal system building operations find their enterprises articulated in a collection of constructs serving to identify their unique subject matters, coupled with sets of premises pertaining to their origins, developments, structures, and relations with the subject matters of other sciences. This is what would ordinarily be called the philosophy of a systematic science. In accord with this philosophy and guided by it are organizations of specialized activity comprising the remaining aspects of a scientific enterprise, namely its investigative, interpretive and applied sub-domains. The manner in which the subject matter of a science is handled, including the terminology with which its operations are described, vary across these domains. For example, in the language of investigation, psychological events exhibit dependency relations; while in philosophical discourse, their interdependence is asserted. Failure to appreciate this variance, especially when the investigative domain of a science is over-valued, engenders spurious arguments among scientists. This paper addresses arguments of this sort among psychological scientists of the behavioral and interbehavioral varieties wherein the latter are held by the former to be all talk and no action. The aim of this paper is to dispel this confusion. |
|
Theories in Practice - Is it all Just Semantics? |
(Theory) |
MITCH FRYLING (California State University, Los Angeles) |
Abstract: The growth and development of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) has led to widespread dissemination efforts around the globe. While this is a good thing, there have been a number of somewhat unforeseen consequences related to the rapid growth of ABA. This presentation describes the role of theories in the practice of ABA. The example of autism treatment will be considered as an example, especially the great variety of seemingly different more or less behavioral treatments, each with their own unique labels and descriptions. The implications of talking about interventions in this way are considered, and the eventual impact on science and clinical work is described. Ultimately, the audience is cautioned against placing too much emphasis on the language used to describe various intervention packages and urged to pursue a behavioral analysis of such packages. The perceived value of doing so rests upon an understanding of how scientific disciplines make progress, which will be a recurrent theme throughout the presentation. Surely, it isnt all just semantics, for descriptions of things impact how we respond to those things, including what research questions we ask about them, eventually impacting the clinical services we provide. |
|
|
|
|
Practice Recommendations and Resources for Supervision in Behavior Analysis |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Forum EF, Niveau 1 |
Area: PRA/TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Chair: Tyra P. Sellers (Utah State University) |
CE Instructor: Tyra P. Sellers, Ph.D. |
Abstract: The demand for employment in behavior analysis has more than doubled from 2012 to 2014 according to a recent report produced by Burning Glass Technologies for the Behavior Analyst Certification Board®. This shifting landscape means that more individuals are in need of supervision as they pursue becoming certified or registered through the BACB® and once they are employed in the field. In this symposium the speakers will cover a variety of considerations and practice recommendations for providing supervision in the field of behavior analysis. We will discuss the rationale for, and potential risks of failing to follow, our specific ethical code covering supervision (Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts 5.0, Behavior Analyst Certification Board®, 2014). We will present a series of recommendations and resources for establishing and maintaining high quality supervision. Finally, we will discuss strategies for detecting and addressing barriers that may develop within the supervisory relationship. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
|
Considering Ethics and Supervision in Behavior Analytic Practice |
Shahla Ala'i-Rosales (UNT), Tyra P. Sellers (Utah State University), Rebecca P. F. MacDonald (New England Center for Children), LINDA A. LEBLANC (LeBlanc Behavioral Consulting LLC) |
Abstract: Supervision of professionals in the field of Behavior Analysis is multifaceted. The BACB® Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysis provides guidance for effective supervisory practices, as supervision impacts both the supervisee and consumers. The purpose of this article is 1) to discuss rationales and consequences relative to supervision issues, 2) to provide directions for professional development in each of the seven identified supervisory areas within the code and 3) to set the occasion for critical discourse relative to supervision. Case examples are used to illustrate each of the seven supervisory subcomponents of the “Behavior Analysts as Supervisors” section of the Code. A rationale is provided for each component, as well as a discussion of possible undesirable consequences resulting from not following the rule. While the code provides clear expectations of the desired behavior, this article explores more of the subtle nuances inherent in each section of the supervision code, with the goal of achieving a better understanding of the Code and enhancing supervisory skills. |
|
Recommended Practices for Individual Supervision in Practicum and Fieldwork Experiences in Preparation for Certification as a Behavior Analyst |
LINDA A. LEBLANC (Trumpet Behavioral Health), Amber Valentino (Trumpet Behavioral Health - Monterey Bay), Tyra P. Sellers (Utah State University) |
Abstract: Practicing behavior analysts and behavior analysts in academic settings often provide supervision for young professionals who are pursuing certification as a behavior analyst. Effective supervision is critical to the quality of ongoing behavioral services, the professional development of the supervisee, the continued growth of the supervisor, and the overall development of our field and its’ practice. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board recently instituted several new requirements including training in supervisory practices prior to supervising those who are accruing hours towards the experience requirement for certification. However, few published resources exist to guide supervisor activities and recommended practice. We summarize five overarching recommended practices for supervision. For each practice, we will discuss detailed strategies and resources for structuring the supervisory experience. |
|
Identifying and Addressing Barriers in the Supervisory Relationship: Recommendations for Supervisors |
TYRA P. SELLERS (Utah State University), Linda A. LeBlanc (Trumpet Behavioral Health), Amber Valentino (Trumpet Behavioral Health - Monterey Bay) |
Abstract: Behavior analysts who supervise staff are responsible for establishing a healthy supervisory relationship and for teaching basic behavior analytic skills (e.g., verbal repertoires, technical repertoires, clinical decision-making). In addition, supervisors should prepare their supervisees to succeed in their subsequent professional activities by developing their interpersonal skills and professionalism repertoires. Difficulties in the supervisor relationship and problematic personal and professional skills often become the focus of targeted supervision efforts after the effects of deficits (e.g., avoidance of supervision, complaints from consumers, persistent tardiness) are detected. The primary purpose of this paper is to provide guidance to the supervisor’s effort to identify and address barriers to successful supervision related to a damaged supervisory relationship and persistent interpersonal and professional skills of the supervisee. A secondary purpose of this paper is to act as a general call to supervisors to continually and thoughtfully reflect on their own history, repertoires, and behavior, such that they may continue professional growth as supervisors. |
|
|
|
|
Food Intake Behavior and Eating Disorders: Inputs of Animal Models |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Scene AB, Niveau 0 |
Area: PRA; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Basic |
CE Instructor: Vinca Riviere, Ph.D. |
Chair: Vinca Riviere (University of Lille ) |
ODILE VILTART (Universite des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 1) |
Dr. Odile Viltart is currently an associate professor at the University of Lille 1. She has served as a referee for Pediatric Research, Journal of Applied Physiology, Hormones and Behavior, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Europoean Child and Adolescent Psychology, and several other journals. She has published over 100 journal articles and book chapters. |
Abstract: Feeding is a behavior essential for survival of every living organism. It guarantees adequate and varied supply of nutriments to maintain appropriate energy levels for basal metabolism, physical activity, growth, and reproduction. In mammals, the maintenance of a high metabolic rate to preserve constant temperature requires constant availability of a sufficient amount of energy stores. The balance between energy demand and expenditure is finely tuned by a constant dialog between homeostatic and hedonic brain systems, and peripheral signals to regulate feeding behavior and energy homeostasis. Understanding mechanisms that control feeding behavior remain a current and crucial scientific subject for understanding both etiology and potential therapeutic approaches of eating disorders that include some forms of obesity, on one hand, and severe forms of anorexia nervosa (AN) on the other. The purpose of this presentation is to describe some of the current animal models used to better understand the feeding behavior and eating disorders with a special focus on AN. |
Target Audience: Board certified behavior analysts, licensed psychologists, graduate students. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) identify the complexity of food intake behavior, from homeostasis to motivation; (2) identify how animal models can be used to better apprehend behavioral dysfunction in eating disorders; (3) discuss the validity of animal models to understand human diseases. |
|
|
|
|
Recent Advancements of a Function-Based Approach to Treating Pediatric Feeding Disorders |
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 |
10:30 AM–11:20 AM |
Studio DE, Niveau 2 |
Area: CBM/DDA; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Melanie H. Bachmeyer (University of North Carolina Wilmington) |
CE Instructor: Melanie H. Bachmeyer, Ph.D. |
Abstract: Decades of research demonstrate that some behavior-analtyic procedures are empirically-supported treatments for food refusal exhibited by children diagnosed with feeding disorders. However, studies examining assessment methodologies to determine the most specific, effective, and efficient function-based interventions are lacking in the behavioral feeding literature. Further, studies demonstrating the effectiveness of function-based interventions to specifically treat varied topographies of feeding problems are scarce. This symposium will discuss recent advancements to a function-based approach of treating pediatric feeding problems. Specifically, Sean Casey will discuss the use of descriptive analyses to determine which procedures are necessary for effective treatment. Melanie Bachmeyer will discuss the correspondence of descriptive and functional analyses of inappropriate mealtime behaviors and the outcomes of interventions matched to each. Finally, Kathryn Peterson will discuss the results of a comparison study between behavior-analytic treatment and a wait-list control group with children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder who exhibit severe food selectivity. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Keyword(s): feeding disorders, food refusal, food selectivity, function-based treatments |
|
Using Descriptive Analyses to Determine What Feeding Procedures to Retain, Discontinue and Add for Effective Treatment |
SEAN D. CASEY (The Iowa Department of Education) |
Abstract: The impact of applied behavior analysis methodologies to address feeding issues has enjoyed unparalleled success (Sharp et al., 2010). However, most of the literature has been demonstrated that treatment is most likely to occur in the medically oriented settings conducted with trained therapists. There are fewer published studies that are occurring in the naturalistic settings (i.e., schools and homes) with parents and school staff being utilized as the therapists during treatment meals (e.g., Gentry & Luiselli, 2008). Descriptive analyses (Mace & Lalli, 1991) offer the clinician the opportunity to see how each care provider responds to the childs bite acceptance and refusal behaviors which can lead to identification of the schedules of care-provider responses to the childs behaviors. This information can then be used to determine what schedule manipulations (i.e., bite acceptance, refusal, or both) to focus for treatment. The usefulness of this information can expedite and maximize treatment success and help to avid the usage of overly complex procedures and avoidance of highly intrusive procedures for some children. Such procedures may be difficult to maintain by feeders who are unlikely to have any training in applied behavior analysis (e.g., parents, school associates). In this study, descriptive analyses were used to identify the naturally occurring responses for bite acceptance and food refusal behaviors for the care-providers of several young children who possessed total food refusal or food selectivity. The results of these assessments and their concomitant treatment procedures are discussed. |
|
A Comparison of Descriptive and Functional Analyses in the Treatment of Pediatric Feeding Disorders |
MELANIE H. BACHMEYER (University of North Carolina Wilmington), Jessica Ashley Keane (University of North Carolina Wilmington), Catherine Elizabeth Graham (University of North Carolina Wilmington), Jessica Woolson (University of North Carolina Wilmington), Sydney Ball (University of North Carolina Wilmington) |
Abstract: Previous research on the correspondence between hypotheses derived from descriptive and functional analyses has shown mixed findings (e.g., Lalli et al., 1993; Lerman & Iwata, 1993; Thompson & Iwata, 2007). Studies comparing the relative effects of treatments matched to each hypothesis when results of these analyses do not correspond are scarce. To our knowledge, no studies to date have conducted a systematic comparison of descriptive and functional analyses outcomes in the treatment of pediatric feeding problems. Therefore, we compared the results of a descriptive analysis and caregiver- and therapist-conducted functional analyses of the inappropriate mealtime behavior of eight children with feeding disorders. Results of the descriptive and functional analyses did not correspond for any of the children. We then compared extinction and reinforcement procedures matched to the results of each analysis using a reversal design. Results of the subsequent treatment evaluations showed that interventions matched to the functional analysis were more effective for all children. Interobserver agreement was collected on at least 33% of sessions and agreement was above 80% for each child. Clinical implications of these findings will be discussed. |
|
Recent Advancements in the Treatment of Food Selectivity in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders |
Kathryn M. Peterson (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Cathleen C. Piazza (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Valerie M. Volkert (Marcus Autism Center and Emory School of Medicine), VIVIAN F IBANEZ (Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center) |
Abstract: Many children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have feeding difficulties, namely food selectivity (i.e., consumption of a limited variety of foods by type or texture). Food selectivity inevitably leads to inadequate dietary intake, which is associated with learning and behavior problems. If left untreated, children with food selectivity also may suffer from malnutrition or other health problems (e.g., constipation, Type II diabetes). Currently, treatments for pediatric feeding disorders based on ABA research have the most empirical support (Volkert & Piazza, 2012); however, there are not as many studies demonstrating the effectiveness of ABA in the treatment of food selectivity. Health professionals often recommend that caregivers wait to see if their child?s feeding difficulties resolve over time, independent of treatment, or suggest alternative treatments that do not have empirical support. In the current study, we compared ABA treatment to a wait-list control group. Independent acceptance of foods increased for children who received applied behavior analysis, but not for children in the wait-list control group. We subsequently implemented applied behavior analysis treatment with the children from the wait-list control and observed a similar increase in independent acceptance across all foods. |