Association for Behavior Analysis International

The Association for Behavior Analysis International® (ABAI) is a nonprofit membership organization with the mission to contribute to the well-being of society by developing, enhancing, and supporting the growth and vitality of the science of behavior analysis through research, education, and practice.

Search

50th Annual Convention; Philadelphia, PA; 2024

Program by Invited Events: Sunday, May 26, 2024


 

Invited Paper Session #180A
CE Offered: PSY/BACB/QABA/NASP
Doreen Granpeesheh Speaker Series for the Interdisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Autism: Autism and Epilepsy: A Coincidence or a Biomarker?
Sunday, May 26, 2024
8:00 AM–8:50 AM
Convention Center, 300 Level, Ballroom B
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: Doreen Granpeesheh (Autism Media Network)
CE Instructor: Doreen Granpeesheh, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: MOHAMMED ALDOSARI (Cleveland Clinic Foundation)
Abstract:

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and epilepsy are both neurological conditions that can significantly impact a child's development and overall well-being. While they may appear to be independent diagnoses, there is a higher co-occurrence rate than chance would predict. This presentation will explore the complex relationship between ASD and epilepsy, equipping therapists with the knowledge and tools to better support their clients who experience both conditions. The presentation will delve into the following key areas: • Prevalence and Risk Factors: We will examine the co-occurrence rates of ASD and epilepsy, exploring potential risk factors and underlying biological mechanisms. • Clinical Presentations: We will discuss the diverse ways in which epilepsy can manifest, including potential challenges in identifying and diagnosing epilepsy in individuals with ASD. • Treatment Considerations: We will explore the evidence-based practices for treating epilepsy to address the unique needs of this population. Here, we will also discuss potential side effects of anti-seizure medications and how they may impact behavior or learning, equipping ABA therapists to collaborate with the medical team for optimal treatment. • Emerging Technologies: We will explore the potential of using new technologies including AI analysis of EEG (electroencephalogram) data for early detection of ASD. This discussion will highlight the promise and limitations of new technologies, emphasizing their role as potential tools to support informed clinical decision-making. • Collaborative Care: We will emphasize the importance of collaboration between ABA therapists, neurologists, and other healthcare professionals in developing comprehensive treatment plans.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Therapists and physicians taking care of individuals with ASD.

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) Describe the co-occurrence rates of ASD and epilepsy and identify potential risk factors for this dual diagnosis; (2) Explain the diverse clinical presentations of ASD and epilepsy, including the challenges of identifying and diagnosing co-occurring conditions; (3) Discuss evidence-based treatment approaches for both ASD and epilepsy, with a specific focus on adapting ABA therapy to meet the needs of clients with this dual diagnosis; (4) Identify potential side effects of anti-seizure medications and how they may impact behavior or learning, allowing for collaboration with the medical team for optimal treatment.
 
MOHAMMED ALDOSARI (Cleveland Clinic Foundation)
Dr. Mohammed Aldosari holds a joint appointment as the as the Director of the Center for Pediatric Neuroscience at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University, both in Cleveland, Ohio. He specializes in the evaluation and management of pediatric behavioral disorders especially Autism and ADHD and collaborates closely with Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Autism. Prior to joining the Cleveland Clinic, Dr. Aldosari established and directed the Center for Autism Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia which is a novel collaborative venture between the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center and the Saudi Basic Industries Company (SABIC) commissioned to transfer knowledge and technology to Saudi Arabia and the region. He also directed autism clinics at several private and public institutions. Dr. Aldosari is American Board certified in Pediatrics and in Child Neurology. He has multiple publications and presentations in national and international journals and meetings in the field of autism especially in genetics and innovative technology including sensing technologies and robotic-assisted therapy. He is the principle investigator of several ongoing studies including a large prevalence of autism study, developing Tele-Diagnostic tools and Arabic stimulus for Eye-Tracking
 
 
Invited Paper Session #184
CE Offered: BACB
Running for the Shelter of a Mother’s Little Helper: Behavioral and Pharmacological Determinants of Benzodiazepine Misuse
Sunday, May 26, 2024
8:00 AM–8:50 AM
Convention Center, 100 Level, 108 AB
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: BPN; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: August F. Holtyn (National Institutes of Health)
CE Instructor: Sally L. Huskinson, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: SALLY L. HUSKINSON (University of Mississippi Medical Center)
Abstract:

Benzodiazepines (BZs) are effective and safe when used appropriately, but their utility is limited by unwanted side effects like misuse and reduced safety when combined with other drugs. Individuals with substance-use disorders (SUDs) misuse BZs as much as 20x greater than the general population, and the rising number of overdose deaths attributed to BZs are largely driven by opioid co-administration. The work I will present is focused on behavioral and pharmacological determinants of BZ reinforcement using preclinical choice models in nonhuman primates. Our overall goal is to identify BZ-type ligands with reduced potential for misuse in naïve subjects as well as in polydrug situations. We have found that nonselective, partial-efficacy BZ ligands or those that lack intrinsic efficacy at α1-subunit containing GABAA (α1GABAA) receptors have reduced potential for misuse relative to traditional BZs. However, our data suggest that the degree to which these BZ-type ligands exhibit potential for misuse depends on the subject’s drug history. A key finding from our choice research is that efficacy at α1GABAA receptors may be necessary for self-administration of BZs in cocaine-experienced subjects but are not required for enhancement of cocaine choice. We currently are evaluating whether this pattern of effects is observed in individuals without prior drug experiences (i.e., in naïve subjects) or with other misused drugs, in particular opioids. The pharmacological mechanisms underlying outcomes based on past drug experience may involve (1) a differential role for α1GABAA receptors in reinforcement enhancing vs. reinforcing effects of BZs alone or (2) differences in overall intrinsic efficacy, irrespective of subtype selectivity.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Basic and clinical students, researchers, and practitioners interested in substance use disorders

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will be able to: 1) Explain how drug experience contributes to benzodiazepine reinforcement; 2) Describe how GABAA subunit selectivity and efficacy may contribute to benzodiazepine reinforcement; 3) Describe the strengths of using choice procedures to answer questions about behavioral and pharmacological mechanisms underlying benzodiazepine reinforcement.
 
SALLY L. HUSKINSON (University of Mississippi Medical Center)
Dr. Sally Huskinson is currently an Associate Professor in the Division of Neurobiology and Behavior Research in the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. As an undergraduate, she worked with Dr. Erin Rasmussen at Idaho State University where she earned her bachelor’s degree (2007) in psychology. She went on to earn her master’s (2011) and doctoral (2012) degrees in psychology at West Virginia University with the mentorship of Dr. Karen Anderson. In 2012, Dr. Huskinson went to the University of Mississippi Medical Center to complete a postdoctoral fellowship in behavioral pharmacology with Dr. William Woolverton until his untimely death in 2013. Dr. Huskinson finished her postdoctoral training with Drs. Kevin Freeman and James Rowlett, also at the University of Mississippi Medical Center where she currently resides. Her research is focused on substance use disorders with a particular interest in behavioral and pharmacological determinants of drug choice, the reinforcing effectiveness of drugs, and in creating more translationally relevant preclinical models of substance use disorders.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #189
CE Offered: BACB
Incorporating Contemplative Pedagogy to Teach the Science of Behavior
Sunday, May 26, 2024
8:00 AM–8:50 AM
Marriott Downtown, Level 5, Grand Ballroom Salon H
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: TBA; Domain: Basic Research
Chair: Kerri L. Milyko (Centria Healthcare)
CE Instructor: Anita Li, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: ANITA LI (University of Massachusetts Lowell)
Abstract:

Teaching the science of behavior involves teaching with rigor to ensure students conceptualize the study of behavior as a natural science. As the growth of our field fosters the need for additional training programs, educators must consider the current landscape for students in higher education, such as increased financial stressors, lack of work-life balance, physically and emotionally demanding jobs, and familial commitments. Contemplative pedagogy incorporates a variety of practices in the classroom to provide an inclusive and transformative space for students. This presentation will introduce contemplative pedagogy and provide examples of exercises for both brick-and-mortar and online instructors to utilize in their classrooms to demonstrate how to incorporate reflection, contemplation, and mindfulness without sacrificing learning or rigor.

Instruction Level: Basic
Target Audience:

Instructors, supervisors

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) define contemplative pedagogy; (2) identify learner dispositions; (3) state how contemplative practices can lead to generativity.
 
ANITA LI (University of Massachusetts Lowell)
Anita Li is currently an Assistant Professor in the Psychology Department at University of Massachusetts Lowell. She has been a Board-Certified Behavior Analyst since 2013 and has worked with individuals with developmental disabilities in a variety of settings. Anita has presented more than 30 papers and workshops, including invited addresses, at both national and international conferences in behavior analysis and has published her research in several journals, including Behavior Analysis in Practice, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, and Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Additionally, Anita has served as guest editor on two special sections of Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice devoted to the experimental analysis of behavior. Her research interests equity issues in behavior analysis, instructional design, and promoting worker well-being.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #222A
CE Offered: BACB
Pharmacotherapy of Interfering Behaviours in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Sunday, May 26, 2024
10:00 AM–10:50 AM
Marriott Downtown, Level 5, Grand Ballroom Salon H
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: CBM; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: Alison Cox (Brock University)
CE Instructor: Alison Cox, M.D.
Presenting Author: ROBERT NICOLSON (University of Western Ontario)
Abstract: Children and adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) commonly have a variety of behvavioural disturbances that can interfere with their ability to participate in interventions and which reduce their quality of life. Chief among these are aggressive behaviour (including self-injurious behaviour) and symptoms commonly seen in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). In this presentation, the role of medication in the treatment regimen of youth with ASD and the evidence supporting the use of psychopharmacological agents will be reviewed. The presentation will also describe the importance of combined treatments (i.e., medication plus behavioural intervention) and the paucity of research investigating such combinations.
Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Clinicians and researchers

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will be able to: 1. Describe the indications for pharmacotherapy in Autism Spectrum Disorder 2. Explain the role of pharmacotherapy in Autism Spectrum Disorder in relation to behavioural intervention 3. Discuss the medical approach to aggressive behaviour in Autism Spectrum Disorder 4. Review the pharmacological treatment of inattention and hyperactivity in Autism Spectrum Disorder
 
ROBERT NICOLSON (University of Western Ontario)
Dr. Nicolson is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Chair of the Developmental Disabilities Program at The University of Western Ontario. He is a child psychiatrist whose clinical practice is largely devoted to children and adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. His research is devoted to the etiology and treatment of children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. He has authored or co-authored over 100 journal articles and he has been an investigator or co-investigator on grants totaling more than $30 million.
 
 
Invited Symposium #223A
CE Offered: BACB
Diversity submission Scholarly Contributions to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Paper Competition Winners
Sunday, May 26, 2024
10:00 AM–10:50 AM
Convention Center, 100 Level, 108 AB
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: DEI; Domain: Service Delivery
Chair: May Chriseline Beaubrun (Brett DiNovi & Associates)
CE Instructor: May Chriseline Beaubrun, Ph.D.
Abstract:

This competition is designed to encourage, promote, and reward behavior analytic scholarship on topics and issues in DEI, both in the field of behavior analysis and more broadly. Students (graduate or undergraduate) and post-graduate professionals who have completed empirical or conceptual papers relevant to DEI that are informed, at least in part, by a behavior-analytic perspective were invited to submit.

Instruction Level: Basic
Target Audience:

Board certified behavior analysts; licensed psychologists; graduate students.

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, attendees will be able to: (1) Articulate the concept of Racism from a behavioral analytic perspective (RDR); (2) Integrate recommendations provided in the presentation into their everyday practices to reduce RDRs; (3) Understand a novel application of behavior systems analysis to examine practices to recruit, retain, and support Black, Indigenous, and People of Color faculty at predominantly White institutions of higher education; (4) Identify concerns faced by these faculty, and potentially efficacious interventions to recruit, retain, and support them; (5)Explain how the “refer-test-place” model which has led school psychologists to over-identify students of color (SOC) with disabilities and place them in special education (SPED) for decades has imposed significant risks upon SOC; (6) Describe a new model for school psychologists in which applied behavior analysis (ABA) is incorporated into their practice and motivational interviewing (MI) is used in consultation to promote teacher buy-in of evidence-based interventions; (7) Explain how school psychologists who have skills in ABA combined with MI can assist in ameliorating disparities in discipline and referrals with subsequent SPED placement; (8) Describe a consultation case that illustrates how her use of ABA and MI facilitated a change in the teacher’s decision to place a SOC in SPED.    
 
Diversity submission Applied Behavior Systems Analysis to Recruit and Retain Black, Indigenous, and People of Color as Faculty at Predominantly White Institutions of Higher Education
MENAKA KUMARI DE ALWIS (University of Oregon)
Abstract: Most universities in the United States continue to uphold and perpetuate values that promote an uncomfortable and unwelcome environment for Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) faculty (Bhambra & Nisangioglu, 2018). Behavior systems analysis (BSA), a subarea of organizational behavior management, evaluates organizations as complex systems with a focus on interlocking, interdependent parts that make up the organization and how they are connected to each other or not (Kast & Rosenweig, 1972; Brethower, 2000). Conducting a BSA allows a university to see how parts of the system interact with each other, how individuals affect the functioning of the system, and how solutions may be multifaceted and will likely involve many systems and processes (McGee, 2007). BSA can identify areas of need that will have the greatest impact on the university when supporting BIPOC faculty, so that resources and supports may be adjusted accordingly (Diener et al., 2009).
Menaka De Alwis is a leadership grant recipient through the United States Office of Special Education Programs and a doctoral candidate in Special Education at the University of Oregon, advised by Dr. Wendy Machalicek in her Applied Behavior Analysis lab. Menaka has a master’s degree from Teachers College, Columbia University in Behavioral Disorders/Applied Behavior Analysis, under the mentorship of Dr. R. D. Greer. She has over 25 years of professional experience working with children (ages 1 to 15) and adults (up to age 59) with disabilities, and their families as a paraeducator, behavior interventionist, teacher (early childhood, inclusion, and special education), clinical director, board certified behavior analyst (public and private organizations), and educational/behavioral consultant. Menaka has spent much of her career supporting teams in public and private PK-12 schools, early intervention centers, homes, community settings, and most recently clinically supervising a behavior intervention services team within a large, urban public school district. Menaka’s research interests include increasing access to culturally responsive evidence-based practices for underserved communities, improving educator and caregiver training practices within natural contexts, and using strategies from organizational behavior management within public school systems to improve outcomes for students, staff, and families.
 
Diversity submission 

Understanding Racism from a Radical Behaviorism Perspective

CHANGZHI WU (University of Reno, Nevada)
Abstract:

Racism is the belief that differences in race and ethnicity lead to inherent superiority of a particular race, with other races posing a threat to one's own (Racism, 2023). However, racism is more than an abstract idea; it is reflected in people's differential responses when they are interacting with people from different races. As racism is a persistent global issue with negative impacts on education, mental health, and economic development (Cohen et al., 2006), it is imperative that all related sciences, including behavior analysis, contribute to the understanding of this behavioral phenomenon therefore necessary social actions can be designed to eliminate it. However, a review of the literature (Matsuda et al., 2020) on racism and prejudice in behavioral journals only identified a few studies related to topics, indicating a lack of understanding and a missing importance placed on racism from a behavior analytical perspective. Considering the urgency and difficulty to eradicate this harmful belief system and related discriminating behaviors, behavior analysts should cooperate with scientists from other disciplines. The purpose of this paper is to examine the formation and maintenance of racism from a radical behaviorism perspective, analyze factors that are identified in existing literatures that are related to discriminations based on races, and propose possible solutions that can be implemented in a social level to reduce racism. Key words: racism, radical behaviorism, factors related to racism

Changzhi Wu is currently in his fourth year of doctoral studies at the University of Reno, Nevada, where he is pursuing a degree in behavior analysis. He received a bachelor’s degree in psychology from Georgia Institute of Technology and a master’s degree in applied behavior analysis from Long Island University, Post. His research interests span cultural behavior, Interbehaviorism, and philosophical considerations within the field of behavior analysis.
 
Diversity submission School Psychologists Improving Equity for Students of Color: Is Applied Behavior Analysis the Answer?”
SARAH HAYES (Durham Public Schools), JEANNIE GOLDEN (East Carolina University)
Abstract: School systems have primarily utilized school psychologists for their expertise in psycho-educational assessment to diagnose students with disabilities. Poor student achievement and behavioral difficulties have historically been addressed by enlisting teachers to make a referral to the school psychologist who will then observe and assess the student to qualify them for extra support through special education (SPED). This “refer-test-place model” has led to the over identification of students of color (SOC) with disabilities for decades (Shinn, 1986, p. 49). Although actual disability does not occur in these populations at a higher rate, SOC are more likely than their white peers to be identified as disabled (National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2020). Furthermore, students who do not need special education do not benefit from it. They are more likely to be at risk of denied access to rigorous educational opportunities, alternative diplomas, dropout, poor grades, increased disciplinary action including suspension and alternative school placement, poor job outlook, and introduction to the criminal justice system (Bekele, 2019; NCLD, 2020)

Sarah Hayes is a licensed school psychologists in NC who recieved her graduate degree from the School Psychology MA/SSP program at East Carolina University. She is currently working as full-time school psychologist for Durham County Public Schools. Sarah is passionate about working with children in the general education public school setting who have difficult problem behavior. Her hope is to reduce the number of children erroneously diagnosed with behavioral disorders and create effective interventions for students with disabilities through the use of behavior analytic principles within a teacher-school consultation model of collaboration. Sarah received the Project CONVEY (Collaborating to Overcome Needs by improving the Voice of Exceptional Youth) grant where she participated with a cohort of multi-disciplinary school teams to build collaborative practices that meet the needs of students with disabilities.

Dr. Jeannie A. Golden is a Licensed Psychologist who received her Ph.D. in School Psychology from Florida State University in 1981. Dr. Golden has been teaching in the Psychology Department at East Carolina University for 42 years and became the first national Board Certified Behavior Analyst in North Carolina in 2000. Dr. Golden received ECU teaching awards in 2001 and 2009, the FABA Honorary Lifetime Membership Award in 1994, the NCABA Fred S. Keller Excellence in Behavior Analysis Award in 2005, the ECU Scholarship of Engagement Award in 2012, the NCABA Do Things Award for Outstanding and Sustained Contributions in 2013, the ECU Psychology Department Faculty Appreciation Award for Mentoring in 2017, the ECU Psychology Department Award for Distinguished Service in 2015 and 2023. Dr. Golden and colleagues received grants from Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust (2008-2011) and the Department of Health and Human Services (2011-2016) to provide school-based mental health services in two rural, impoverished counties in North Carolina. In March of 2018, Dr. Golden and colleagues were awarded the Creating New Economies Grant by Resourceful Communities for the Greene County Community Advancement Project. Dr. Golden and colleagues (2020) have developed a training program for staff who work with traumatized youth titled Trauma: The invisible Elephant Underlying Challenging Behavior. Dr. Golden and her mentee, Sarah Hayes (2023) have also developed a micro-credential titled De-Escalating Challenging Behavior as part of the Educator Pipeline In Rural Action for Teaching Equity Grant awarded to the Rural Education Institute at East Carolina University.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #261
CE Offered: BACB
Charting New Frontiers in Education and Beyond: Precision Teaching in the Modern Era
Sunday, May 26, 2024
11:00 AM–11:50 AM
Marriott Downtown, Level 5, Grand Ballroom Salon H
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: EDC; Domain: Theory
Chair: Samantha Riggleman (Saint Joseph's University)
CE Instructor: Athanasios Vostanis, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: ATHANASIOS VOSTANIS (University of Kent)
Abstract:

Precision Teaching, historically applied within educational contexts, has seen its most groundbreaking discoveries, such as the concept of behavioral fluency, unfold within mainstream academic classrooms. This method, however, has not been limited solely to these settings but has also been employed with diverse populations, including those with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. This presentation will delve into an exploration of the current state of the Precision Teaching field while considering the potential for forging new pathways that can extend its reach into various domains and expand our understanding of essential behavioral concepts such as celeration, fluency, and behavioral agility.

Instruction Level: Basic
Target Audience:

Behaviour Analysts/Precision Teachers

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) gain insight into the contemporary landscape of Precision Teaching; (2) acquire an enhanced awareness of cutting-edge applications of Precision Teaching; (3) critically consider the potential to engage in more advanced analyses of essential Precision Teaching concepts
 
ATHANASIOS VOSTANIS (University of Kent)
Dr Thanos Vostanis is a lecturer at the Tizard Centre, University of Kent, where he specializes in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. He brings a wealth of experience to the table, having worked in both mainstream and special education. He is a qualified teacher (QTS), a certified behavior analyst in the United Kingdom–UKBA(cert), and a board-certified behavior analyst doctoral (BCBA-D). Thanos has also completed additional training in the CABAS® model and the Morningside Model of Generative Instruction. As the vice president of international relations for the Standard Celeration Society, Thanos is at the forefront of advancing the field of Precision Teaching. He is committed to disseminating Precision Teaching to professionals in diverse settings and evaluating its effects across novel application areas, both within and outside the field of education. Thanos' research interests focus on Precision Teaching and Instructional Design, and he aims to bring this innovative approach to a wider audience.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #67A
CE Offered: BACB
Selection and Complexity in Cultural Cusps: Latin America's Independence From Spain
Sunday, May 26, 2024
3:00 PM–4:00 PM
Convention Center, 300 Level, Ballroom B
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: CSS; Domain: Theory
Chair: Kathryn M. Roose (State of Nevada, Division of Child and Family Services)
CE Instructor: Maria E. Malott, Ph.D.
Presenting Authors: MARIA E. MALOTT (Association for Behavior Analysis International), SIGRID S. GLENN (University of North Texas)
Abstract:

After nearly 300 years of Spanish domination of Latin America, the first Venezuelan congress declared independence from the Spanish Crown on July 5, 1811. The declaration led to a series of events that culminated not only in the actual independence of Venezuela 10 years later in 1821, but also in that of Boliva, Colombia, Ecuador, Panamá, and Peru—known as the Bolivarian countries in reference to Simon Bolivar’s leadership in their liberation. Although, the first declaration of Venezuela’s independence initially failed, it constituted a cultural cusp where complex and evolving environmental conditions led to the coalescence of emerging individual behavioral contingencies, organizations’ dynamics and products, and unique non-recurring actions, which together changed the destiny of a portion of Latin America until this day. In this presentation, these independence movements are viewed as historical experiments that shed light on the complexity and selection of cultural phenomena.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Behavior analysts interested in the complexity and selection of cultural phenomena.

Learning Objectives: At the end of this presentation, attendees will be able to: (1) Define a cultural cusp; (2) Describe the effects of Venezuela’s first declaration of independence on individual behavioral contingencies, organizations’ dynamics and products, and unique non-recurring actions; (3) Describe how independence movements can be viewed as historical experiments that shed light on the complexity and selection of cultural phenomena.
 
MARIA E. MALOTT (Association for Behavior Analysis International)
Since 1993, Dr. Malott has served as Executive Director/CEO of the Association for Behavior Analysis International and Secretary Treasurer of the Society for the Advancement for Behavior Analysis. Previously, she was vice-president of manufacturing in a Midwest company in the United States. In addition, for more than 12 years, she worked as a consultant for a variety of businesses in service, retail, manufacturing, education, government, and others. She has served as affiliate faculty member at five universities and on five editorial boards. She coauthored a textbook on principles of behavior and authored two editions of a textbook on culturo-behavioral change. She has published dozens of peer reviewed publications and hundreds of presentations in 22 countries. In all applied and theoretical work, she specializes in cultural analysis and the management and improvement of behavioral systems. Dr. Malott is a fellow of ABAI and was the recipient of the 2003 Award for International Dissemination of Behavior Analysis, the 2004 Award for Outstanding Achievement in Organizational Behavior Management, and the 2012 Award for Distinguished Service to Behavior Analysis. She also received the 2002 Outstanding Alumni Award from the Department of Psychology at Western Michigan University.
SIGRID S. GLENN (University of North Texas)
Dr. Sigrid Glenn's passionate commitment to the future of behavior analysis has resulted in numerous contributions to her chosen field. She has co-authored four books and more than 45 articles and book chapters. Although her early research was mainly in applied areas, she is widely recognized for her later conceptual work on selection at behavioral and cultural levels. As founding chair of the Department of Behavior Analysis at the University of North Texas, Dr. Glenn established master's and bachelor's degree programs in behavior analysis, leading the faculty in the first accreditation of a graduate program by ABAI. With characteristic prescience about important developments in the field, Dr. Glenn, a charter certificant of the Behavior Analysis Certification Board (BACB), also led the faculty in developing the first Internet sequence of behavior analysis courses approved by the BACB. Dr. Glenn has served as editor of The Behavior Analyst and on the editorial boards of several other journals. She is a former president of ABAI (1993-1994), a fellow of Division 25 of the American Psychological Association, and Regents Professor of Behavior Analysis at the University of North Texas.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #304
CE Offered: BACB
Measurement, Application, and Death in Research on Stimulus Equivalence
Sunday, May 26, 2024
3:00 PM–3:50 PM
Convention Center, 100 Level, 108 AB
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: EAB; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: Darlene E. Crone-Todd (Salem State University)
CE Instructor: Christoffer K. Eilifsen, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: CHRISTOFFER K. EILIFSEN (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Abstract:

In psychology, including in various forms of behaviorism, many once prominent research traditions are no longer active fields of inquiry. While research on stimulus equivalence currently appears relatively vibrant when looking at the number of published articles, historical fields of inquiry proposing to study similar derived or emergent phenomenon have, following a period of research activity, subsequently disappeared from the literature. One such field is research on mediated generalization, a line of research that originated in a branch of behaviorism with somewhat differing theoretical commitments from modern behavior analysis. Lessons may potentially be drawn from the demise of this tradition for current research on stimulus equivalence. By the time of its demise, research on mediated generalization had several interrelated characteristics including: (a) unobservable explanatory constructs guiding scientific activity, (b) reliance of inferential group statistics for analyzing effects on the dependent variable, (c) indirect measurement of the dependent variable, and (d) complete domination by basic laboratory research. While the first two topics will provide context, the current presentation will focus on the two latter issues. Publication trends relevant to these characteristics as they appear in the empirical literature on mediated generalization, modern stimulus equivalence research and research in the related field of relational frame theory will be presented. Several topics arising from this comparison will be discussed. including the use of so-called savings and reaction time measurements and the interplay between basic research and application in stimulus equivalence and related fields.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Persons with an interest in historical and current research trends in behaviorism in general and/or historical and current research trends mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence specifically.

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) explain similarities and differences between stimulus equivalence and mediated generalization; (2) describe historical and current publication trends in research programs on mediated generalization, stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory; (3) provide examples of and discuss how theoretical commitments influence research programmes in the study of derived and emergent relations.
 
CHRISTOFFER K. EILIFSEN (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Dr. Christoffer Eilifsen is an Associate Professor at Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway. His research background is in empirical research on stimulus equivalence, including studies of the long-term retention of equivalence classes, research on the effect of training structures on equivalence class formation, and the analysis of reaction time in studies of stimulus equivalence. In addition, he has also always had a soft spot for the philosophy of science and a variety conceptual and historical issues in behavior analysis and beyond and has published in this field as well. He has recently lapsed into academic sector management, and now works as the Program Director responsible for a PhD Program in Behavior Analysis, an ABAI accredited MS in Behavioral Science and an ABAI accredited BS in Psychology with an Emphasis on Behavior Analysis, all at the Oslo Metropolitan University.
 
 
Invited Symposium #203A
CE Offered: BACB
The Matching Law: Past, Present, and Future
Sunday, May 26, 2024
4:00 PM–5:50 PM
Convention Center, 300 Level, Ballroom B
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: SCI; Domain: Theory
Chair: Jonathan W. Pinkston (University of Kansas)
Discussant: Jack J McDowell (Emory University)
CE Instructor: Jonathan W. Pinkston, Ph.D.
Abstract:

The Matching Law was developed in the early days of behavior analytic research to describe the allocation of behavior across response alternatives as a function of relative reinforcement available from those alternatives. Today, the Matching Law and other quantitative accounts of behavior have surpassed their beginnings as mathematical descriptions of behavior and serve as important conceptual tools that build bridges to other disciplines and solve significant clinical and social problems. In recognition of ABAI’s 50th year, this symposium highlights the history, conceptual advances, and future of the Matching Law with respect to research, application, and the development of public policy.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Researchers, BACBAs, practitioners, and graduate students

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) Define the Matching Law; (2) Describe how the Matching Law can be used to predict choice; (3) Describe applications of the Matching Law to understand complex behavior; (4) Describe how the Matching Law can be used to guide the development of novel therapeutics
 
The Matching Law and Neuroscience
PAUL L. SOTO (Louisiana State University)
Abstract: Since the publication of Herrnstein’s 1961 paper on the relation between relative and absolute rates of responding and rates of reinforcement, there have been many studies extending the matching law to a variety of domains, many studies refining the matching law, and many studies focused on explaining matching as the outcome of other behavioral processes. The precision and robustness of the phenomenon of matching has made it particularly conducive for the investigation of biological variables, primarily variables of the central nervous system, that mediate and moderate matching. Some of the work on the matching law and neuroscience will be highlighted for this symposium on the matching law.
Dr. Soto completed a Ph.D. at Emory University and postdoctoral training at the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Dr. Soto is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology at Louisiana State University (LSU). Dr. Soto previously held positions in the School of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University and at Texas Tech University. Dr. Soto’s research interests are in (1) the use of laboratory animal models of psychiatric diseases and symptoms for the evaluation of potential therapeutic approaches, (2) the use of drugs and genetically engineered animals to identify the neurobiological contributors to basic and complex behavioral processes, and (3) the investigation of short- and long-term effects of exposure to psychiatric medications. Recently, Dr. Soto has begun advocating for the use of single-case experimental designs in areas outside of behavior analysis, such as behavioral neuroscience, because of the scientific and ethical benefits provided by these designs.
 
Applying the Matching Law to Quantify the Influence of Socially Mediated Reinforcement on Behavioral Disorders & Differences
SAMUEL L MORRIS (Louisiana State University)
Abstract: Quantitative models of behavior allow for precise descriptions of behavior-environment functional relations and facilitate improvement in our ability to predict and influence behavior. These characteristics are evident in basic research on the matching law and may be especially beneficial in its application to problems of societal importance. This talk will explore how the matching law can quantify the influence of socially mediated reinforcement across diverse contexts of applied significance, including assessment and intervention for (a) conversational behaviors, (b) social time allocation, and (c) disruptive or challenging behaviors. Previous research, ongoing projects, and important future directions related to each area of application will be discussed. The ultimate aim of this talk is to highlight how continued application of the matching law can facilitate progress in research and clinical practice.
Sam Morris obtained his Ph.D. in Psychology with a specialization in Behavior Analysis at the University of Florida under the mentorship of Dr. Tim Vollmer. He was an Assistant Professor and the Applied Behavior Analysis Program Coordinator at Southeastern Louisiana University before beginning his current position as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at Louisiana State University in 2022. Dr. Morris' laboratory utilizes experimental manipulations of the environment to investigate causal influences on choice and inform methods of facilitating behavior change. The individualization of reinforcement procedures and relative efficacy of different types and parameters of reinforcement have proven uniting themes underlying his research to date. Dr. Morris teaches a variety of behavior-analytic courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, serves on the editorial board for the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, and frequently serves as a reviewer for top behavior-analytic journals.
 
Dynamics of Behavioral Persistence in Self-Injury
JOHN FALLIGANT (Kennedy Krieger Institute/Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)
Abstract: In the majority of cases, self-injurious behavior (SIB) is maintained by social positive or social negative reinforcement. However, in some cases SIB persists in the absence of socially mediated consequences. This latter functional class of behavior is said to be automatically maintained because the response dynamics imply the behavior produces its own reinforcement. Researchers have long noted distinct patterns of automatically maintained SIB within the functional analysis and other assessments. One pattern is characterized by elevated levels of SIB in environments with minimal stimulation, and low levels of SIB in highly enriched environments. This differentiated pattern is referred to as Subtype 1 SIB. Another pattern is characterized by invariant SIB that occurs across environmental conditions irrespective of the degree of stimulation present. This intransient and undifferentiated pattern is referred to as Subtype 2 SIB. Notably, Subtype 1 SIB is far more responsive to treatment using reinforcement alone, rarely requires protective equipment and restraint, and presents with less serious injuries at the time of intake relative to Subtype 2 SIB. The contrasting dynamics of Subtypes 1 and 2 with respect to how SIB is disrupted by alternative reinforcement has led to speculation about possible differences in the type or magnitude of sensory consequences that SIB produces across subtypes. In this presentation I will summarize some evidence in support of this hypothesis, and discuss recent developments, informed by matching theory, that may shed additional light on the typologies of automatically maintained SIB.
Dr. Falligant is a clinical psychologist and Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA-D). He received his Ph.D. from Auburn University, and is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and a Senior Behavior Analyst in the Neurobehavioral Unit at the Kennedy Krieger Institute. The Neurobehavioral Programs at the Kennedy Krieger Institute serve individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) who suffer from severe behavioral dysfunction, including self-injury. Dr. Falligant’s work coalesces around the assessment and treatment of challenging behavior in individuals with IDD. His research focuses on the analysis of transdiagnostic neurobehavioral variables underlying behavioral dysfunction, persistence and relapse, and the identification of functional behavioral phenotypes pertinent to treatment-resistant behavior. A unifying theme across these areas is the fine-grained analysis of behavioral events, including the microstructural analysis of behavior and its dynamics.
 
The Scalability of Quantitative Models of Choice: Implications for Public Policy, Big Data, and Beyond
DEREK D. REED (Institutes for Behavior Resources, Inc.)
Abstract: Matching Theory is the foundational concept for most modern quantitative models of choice in behavior analysis. In particular, Matching Theory is responsible for two leading behavioral economic models that have robust literature in taking behavior analysis to scale: delay discounting and operant demand. Despite the proliferation of behavioral economic models to large-scale issues of social importance, the direct translation of the Matching Law to these issues remains relatively scant. This presentation will provide an overview of the Matching Theory underpinnings of modern behavioral economics and briefly showcase the scalability afforded by these studies. The bulk of the presentation will focus on the translational promise of Matching Theory, specifically. A discussion of previous translations outside the operant lab will serve as models for continued application. The presentation will conclude with specific areas in which Matching Theory could have translational success.
Dr. Derek Reed is Director of Applied Behavioral Sciences at Institutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., with over 20 years of experience in behavior analysis and behavioral economics. He has served as Associate Editor for the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Behavior Analysis in Practice, and The Psychological Record. Dr. Reed has over 180 publications, coauthored three edited books and one textbook, and has won numerous awards for his scholarship, such as the American Psychological Association Division 25 B. F. Skinner Foundation New Applied Researcher Award, the Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Don Hake Award for Translational Research, and the Federation of Associations in Behavioral and Brain Sciences Early Career Award. He served as Coordinator of the Association for Behavior Analysis International’s Science Board and on the Board of Directors for the Society for the Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, of which he was previously Executive Director. Dr. Reed’s research focuses on the application of behavioral economic principles to improve issues of societal concern.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #331
CE Offered: BACB — 
Ethics
Data Science and Behavior Analysis: A Love Story in a Foreign Land
Sunday, May 26, 2024
4:00 PM–4:50 PM
Marriott Downtown, Level 5, Grand Ballroom Salon H
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: SCI; Domain: Basic Research
Chair: Jonathan W. Pinkston (University of Kansas)
CE Instructor: David J. Cox, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: DAVID J. COX (RethinkFirst; Endicott College)
Abstract:

Biological organisms are always embedded within a dynamically changing environment rich with stimuli, each potentially influencing one or more behaviors at any given moment. Due to technological constraints, behavior analysts historically had to select which environmental stimuli and behaviors to focus on for data collection. But times have changed. Current technologies enable the collection of extensive data on both behavior and the environment, overcoming traditional limitations. However, managing and analyzing larger datasets necessitates a core set of scalable skills which is the domain of data science. With the right data and skills, however, behavior analysts can begin to explore questions with unprecedented precision, such as: • The exact influence of many variables in the multiple control of behavior; • Detailed, data-driven descriptions and predictions of motivating operation; and • The interplay of molar and molecular contingencies for describing and predicting behavior for a specific individual.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

Behavior analytic practitioners and researchers

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe the core areas of data science as a field; (2) describe how to translate theoretical ideas into structured datasets where data science can be leveraged to derive data-based answers to related questions; (3) describe at least three areas where combining data science and behavior science might lead to a novel understanding of the behavior of biological organisms.
 
DAVID J. COX (RethinkFirst; Endicott College)
Dr. David Cox leads Data Science for RethinkFutures. Dr. Cox has worked within the behavioral health industry for 17 years. He began working in behavioral health by providing and then supervising Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) programs for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. After 8 years of clinical work, Dr. Cox went back to school to earn a MS in Bioethics, a PhD in Behavior Analysis from the University of Florida, Post-Doctoral Training in Behavioral Pharmacology and Behavioral Economics from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and Post-Doctoral Training in Data Science from the Insight! Data Science program. Since 2014, Dr. Cox’s research and applied work has focused on how to effectively leverage technology, quantitative modeling, and artificial intelligence to ethically optimize behavioral health outcomes and clinical decision-making. Based on his individual and collaborative work, he has published over 45 peer-reviewed articles, three books, and over 150 presentations at scientific conferences.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #336A
CE Offered: BACB
Behavior Analysis and B. F. Skinner: A 20th Century Science and Scientist’s Contributions to The 21st Century
Sunday, May 26, 2024
5:00 PM–5:50 PM
Convention Center, 100 Level, 108 AB
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: PCH; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: Caio F. Miguel (California State University, Sacramento)
CE Instructor: Maria Amalia Andery, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: MARIA AMALIA ANDERY (Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo)
Abstract: Behaviorism was inaugurated in 1913 by Watson’s paper. From 1930 to 1990, Skinner published near 300 titles, contributing heavily to behavior analysis and behaviorism. His work was driven by the development of science itself, as shown by his experimental work, and by context, or else, social variables, as shown by his philosophical writings and by titles intended to reach a broader public. A longitudinal analysis of Skinner’s most influencing articles and books clearly shows how behavior analysis as a science, and Skinner’s perspective as an intellectual were in synchrony with the political, social cultural, and scientific issues of the 20th century over the six decades of his career. This is why one could say that behavior analysis and Skinner were a 20th century science and scientist. But behavior analysis is also equipped to heavily contribute to issues that characterize the 21st century. To understand many of the impacts of Internet on individual behavior and cultures or to intervene successfully on education, for example, some of the philosophical and scientific principles built by behavior analysis and Skinner, such as selection by consequences, operant and respondent behavior, reinforcement, stimulus control, operant verbal behavior are key, useful, and may bring a new and fresh perspective to these and other 21st century issues.
Instruction Level: Basic
Target Audience:

Information will be updated soon.

Learning Objectives: Information will be updated soon.
 
MARIA AMALIA ANDERY (Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo)
Maria Amalia Pie Abib Andery is a full professor of Psychology at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP) with undergraduate training in Psychology at PUC-SP, a Master degree at the University of Manitoba and a Ph.D. degree at PUC-SP. Maria Amalia’s training, research interests, and publications are in the field of behavior analysis, cultural practices and the relationships between verbal and non-verbal behavior. Maria Amalia advised many master and doctoral students, published 39 papers in Brazilian and foreign journals, more than 38 book chapters and contributes as a blind reviewer to Brazilian and international journals. Maria Amalia was also a member and consultant at national and state Brazilian agencies of Research and to the Ministry of Education. Maria Amalia founded the graduate Program of Experimental Psychology at PUC-SP, was dean of the College of Human and Health Sciences of the University, provost of Graduate Studies and is presently the Rector of the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (since 2016).
 
 
Invited Paper Session #349
CE Offered: BACB
Telling the Truth: Behavioral Procedures for Increasing the Accuracy of Reporting Past Events
Sunday, May 26, 2024
5:00 PM–5:50 PM
Marriott Downtown, Level 5, Grand Ballroom Salon H
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: Rocio Rosales (University of Massachusetts Lowell)
CE Instructor: Mariele Cortez, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: MARIELE CORTEZ (Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos)
Abstract:

The controlling relation between nonverbal environment and verbal response is the central feature of the tact. However, stimulus control may be distorted by certain special consequences that are mediated by the listener under particular circumstances. In a major case of stimulus control distortion, the speaker emits a response under circumstances that normally control an incompatible response, what is called a lie. Inaccurate responding about past events could have detrimental effects on social relationships and also affect children’s safety. Caregivers expect their children to report their past behavior honestly when asked about their routine at school, how they got hurt, and so on. Honest verbal reports are also important, for example, in clinical settings and court proceeding, which may involve children’s eyewitness testimony. The positive relation between past and present behavior, whether verbal or not, has been labeled correspondence. We refer to do-say correspondence when individuals say or accurately report what they have done. Research on do-say correspondence has investigated the role of specific conditions under which reports about past may be accurate (honest) or inaccurate (dishonest). I will describe how basic experimental research on do-say correspondence has identified environmental variables that lead to dishonest reports. Additionally, I will present some behavioral procedures for increasing the accuracy of reporting past events in children, including those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). I will also discuss the role of teaching problem-solving strategies on accurately reporting past events. This presentation will conclude with a call for researchers to systematically investigate the variables and the procedures that may lead to reliable reports of past events.

Instruction Level: Basic
Target Audience:

Behavior analysts interested in the experimental analysis of verbal behavior and, more specifically, in tacts of past events.

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) Functionally analyze honest and dishonest reports about past events; (2) List the effects of different environmental variables on children’s reports accuracy about past events; (3) Describe procedures for increasing the accuracy of reporting past events; (4) Discuss the importance of applying the methods and strategies of basic research when planning interventions for teaching tacts of past events.
 
MARIELE CORTEZ (Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos)
Dr. Mariele Cortez is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Federal University of São Carlos (Brazil), where she teaches courses and supervises master and doctoral students in Psychology. She is also a researcher member of the National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition and Teaching in Brazil that is a network that integrates basic, translational and applied research in a multi-institutional program. She is the current Editor-in-Chief of the Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis (BJBA) and she has served as associate editor of BJBA and Perspectives in Behavior Analysis (Brazil). She has reviewed manuscripts for various Brazilian and international scientific journals like JABA and EJOBA. Dr. Cortez’s research focuses on the study of verbal behavior with special interest in evaluating the efficacy of a variety of procedures to teach language for children with or without autism and investigating environmental variables that affect the accuracy of reporting past events, using single-subject designs.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #350
CE Offered: BACB
Development and Validation of Owner-Implemented Protocols for Companion Dogs
Sunday, May 26, 2024
6:00 PM–6:50 PM
Convention Center, 100 Level, 108 AB
📺   Streaming Status: recording available
Area: AAB; Domain: Applied Research
Chair: Erica N. Feuerbacher (Virginia Tech)
CE Instructor: Mindy Waite, Ph.D.
Presenting Author: MINDY WAITE (Carroll University)
Abstract:

Behavior problems are common in companion animals, yet relatively few behavior intervention protocols have been validated for this population. Further, even fewer studies have packaged validated protocols for public consumption or assessed the incorporation of owners as implementers. As a result, owners must turn to unvalidated, publicly available protocols or work with behavior practitioners using procedures with undetermined validity and owner fidelity to protocol. This is problematic, as owners are typically expected to perform the majority of intervention implementation, and ineffective protocols or lack of procedural fidelity can result in poor outcomes. This presentation will discuss previous and current behavior analytic research incorporating owners into behavior protocols for companion dogs, including functional analyses, preference assessments, and a discussion of a recent study to develop and analyze a choice-based, owner-implemented protocol focused on training companion dogs to cooperatively participate in ear cleaning. Across studies, protocols were efficacious and had high social validity and owner integrity. For both the ear cleaning and preference assessment studies, owners implemented the majority of the protocols with both autonomy and high fidelity. However, some owners required individualized support, with the amount required being unique to each pair, suggesting that owner-implemented protocols may require some professional oversight.

Instruction Level: Intermediate
Target Audience:

junior BCBAs, Behavior analysts within their first 5 years of practice (including practitioners, supervisors, etc.), Currently enrolled in or recently completed graduate-level work

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe existing literature on incorporation of owners into behavior protocols in companion animals; (2) describe ways to package protocols which may increase procedural fidelity during owner implementation; (3) prepare for different types and amounts of support requested by owners during autonomous protocol implementation.
 
MINDY WAITE (Carroll University)
Mindy is a clinical assistant professor in the Animal Behavior Program at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI and instructor at Virginia Tech in the Applied Animal Behavior and Welfare program, where she is also on several graduate student committees. She is a board-Certified Applied Animal Behaviorist (CAAB). In addition to teaching and consulting, Mindy engages in research on companion canine behavior. Her early studies focused on the prevalence, function, and function-based interventions for mouthing behavior in dogs. Current studies focus on developing and validating owner-implemented protocols which can be autonomously carried out by animal caretakers. Her previous publication focused on the modification and validation of an owner-implemented food preference assessment for dogs, and her current study focuses on the validation of a protocol offering asynchronous modeling and coaching to owners autonomously training their dogs to cooperatively engage in an ear cleaning procedure. Her research has received several awards, including the Marian Breland-Bailey Award and Fear Free Award, as well as competitive funding from Fear Free. She received her BS in Genetics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, PhD in Molecular Biology (mouse brain development) from the University of Michigan, and MS in Behavior Analysis from Marquette University.
 

BACK TO THE TOP

 

Back to Top
ValidatorError
  
Modifed by Eddie Soh
DONATE
{"isActive":false}