|
|
Teaching to Condition |
Sunday, May 28, 2023 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Hyatt Regency, Capitol Ballroom 1-3 |
Area: DEV; Domain: Service Delivery |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: JeanneMarie Speckman, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jo Ann Pereira Delgado (Teachers College, Columbia University) |
Presenting Authors: : JEANNEMARIE SPECKMAN (Fred S. Keller School Teachers College Columbia University) |
Abstract: Conditioning new stimuli such that they now function as reinforcers for other behaviors serves several important purposes in human development. Increasing one’s community of reinforcers provides individuals with more opportunities to come in contact with reinforcement which increases rates of learning. It also means that individuals’ interests are expanded which, when this occurs, will likely lead to fewer instances and lower durations of such behaviors as stereotypy and other developmentally maladaptive response classes. Maybe most importantly, conditioning certain stimuli as reinforcers for observing responses enables individuals to contact reinforcement in ways they had not been able to do before; hence, the development of a cusp. Training behavior analysts and behavior technicians to implement conditioning procedures can prove more difficult than training other more straightforward discreet trial programs. Therefore, training must be accurate, systematic and because these pairings are so important to human development, highly efficient. Here I will present training systems that meet these criteria, to teach these instructional repertoires to behavior analytic instructors. I will also discuss extending training systems to include successfully training another instructor to correctly implement conditioning procedures as mastery criterion for training. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Target Audience: Behavior Analysts, Supervisors, and Researchers |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe the steps in an operant conditioning procedure; (2) describe the steps in a classical conditioning procedure; (2) describe the steps in a conjugate conditioning procedure; (3) understand the components of an effective training system to teach instructors and trainers to implement effective conditioning procedures and protocols. |
|
JEANNEMARIE SPECKMAN (Fred S. Keller School Teachers College Columbia University) |
JeanneMarie Speckman is a CABAS® and NYS certified Behavior Analyst who received her Ph.D. from Columbia University in the program in Teaching as Applied Behavior Analysis. She is also a certified Teacher of the Speech and Hearing Handicapped. For the past twenty-one years Dr. Speckman has been the Associate Director of the Fred S. Keller School which serves children five and younger, most of whom have language-based disabilities. Prior to that she taught in a classroom and supervised classroom teachers. She is an associate adjunct professor at Teachers College Columbia University for the program in Teaching as Applied Behavior Analysis. Her area of research has primarily been early verbal behavior foundations and protocols to induce early foundational cusps. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Ethics of Appetitive Control: On the Transness of Orienting Back to Our Bodies |
Sunday, May 28, 2023 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 2/3 |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Mychal Machado, Ph.D. |
Chair: Mychal Machado (University of Alaska Anchorage) |
Presenting Authors: : WORNER LELAND (Sex Ed Continuing Ed) |
Abstract: “The reason you don’t fight for me is because you’re not fighting for yourself fully… Are you ready to heal?... That’s why they repress us as trans and gender variant people, because they’ve done this violence to themselves first.” - Alok Vaid-Menon When supporting transgender and gender-nonconforming clients, students, supervisees, trainees, and colleagues, it is critical that behavior analysts create contexts of affirmation. When considering cultural responsiveness, the Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts notes that behavior analysts “evaluate their own biases and ability to address the needs of individuals with diverse needs/ backgrounds,” (BACB, 2020, p. 9). This presentation will examine gender identity as covert or subtle behavior, and the ways in which the tacting of covert events is taught (Skinner, 1945; Skinner, 1957; Moore, 2008). Attendees will be equipped to assess their own biases through the examination of selectionism at the phylogenic, ontogenic, and cultural levels, focusing on their own learning histories. Attendees will also learn how to create environments which forster orienting to appetitive control and which reinforce authentic responding through cultural competency and the movement toward cultural safety (Curtis et al., 2019). |
Instruction Level: Basic |
Target Audience: ABA practitioners and professionals |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will be able to: 1. Generate 2. Demonstrate 3. Demonstrate 4. List critical steps |
|
WORNER LELAND (Sex Ed Continuing Ed) |
Worner Leland, MS, BCBA, LBA (they/them) is a former researcher and educator with Upswing Advocates, a current educator with Sex Ed Continuing Ed, a current collaborative writer with the Assent Lab, and a past president of the Sexual Behavior Research and Practice SIG of ABAI. Their work focuses on sex education, assent and consent education, and harm reduction and coercion reduction education in behavior analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teaching Generalized Question Discrimination Skills to Children With Autism: Analysis and Application |
Sunday, May 28, 2023 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 1 |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Francesca Degli Espinosa, Ph.D. |
Chair: Meral KOLDAS (Queen's University of Belfast) |
Presenting Authors: : FRANCESCA DEGLI ESPINOSA (ABA Clinic) |
Abstract: Responding to questions regarding one's environment is a fundamental skill. In neuro-typical children, responding differentially to questions emerges before the age of two through interactions with caregivers, in which novel words are learned in the presence of both verbal and nonverbal stimuli. For children diagnosed with autism, however, such question discrimination skills can be significantly affected. An error frequently observed in clinical practice is that of the child who, despite previous mastery of the relevant colour tacts, says “Ball” when presented with a blue ball and the question “What colour?” Recently, a number of papers have explored the role of multiple verbal and nonverbal control in early intraverbal-tacting as a basis for language intervention with particular focus on autoclitic framing. This tutorial will first provide a theoretical analysis on multiply-controlled tacting; second, it will outline a framework for assessing discriminating questions on nonverbal (visual) stimuli; third, it will illustrate applied techniques to establish this skill. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Target Audience: Behaviour analysts, speech and language pathologists, educators |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe sources of multiple stimulus control in verbal behaviour; (2) describe procedures to establish generalised question discrimination on visual stimuli; (3) describe an instructional sequence to establish question discrimination skills regarding objects and events |
|
FRANCESCA DEGLI ESPINOSA (ABA Clinic) |
I fell in love with behaviour analysis in 1996, when I began working as a tutor for a child with autism, and almost immediately I became interested in interventions that could both define and establish generalised learning: the ability to demonstrate novel responses within an operant class without each individual response having been previously reinforced. I was given the opportunity to explore this question when I worked as the Lead Clinician for the first UK-based EIBI outcome study (Remington et al., 2007), and within that context developed the Early Behavioural Intervention Curriculum (EBIC) as an intervention framework derived from functional analyses of language. This work subsequently formed the principal focus for my Doctoral thesis (2011). My clinical and research interests eventually settled, and continue to be, on advanced applications of contemporary analyses of verbal behaviour (Horne & Lowe, 1996; Michael, Palmer, & Sundberg, 2011) as a basis for teaching generalised verbal repertoires, and, thereby, as a means of minimising the need to teach specific individual verbal responses. Having spent the last 20 years travelling around the world teaching behaviour analysis, the pandemic lead to a reassessment of my core values. I currently live in the UK where I lead a rather quiet life with my family and two dogs that challenge my behavioural training on a daily basis. Professionally, I continue to provide diagnostic and evaluation services to families, and to support fellow behaviour analysts acquiring curriculum development skills through mentorship and online courses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporating Virtual Reality Into Behavior Analysis: Innovation and Interdisciplinary Opportunity |
Sunday, May 28, 2023 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 2/3 |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
BACB CE Offered. CE Instructor: Paula Ribeiro Kenyon, Ph.D. |
Chair: Paula Kenyon (Northeastern University and Grupo Método) |
Presenting Authors: : CASEY CLAY (Children's Hospital of Orange County) |
Abstract: Several industries are leveraging virtual reality (VR) training to teach a variety of skills. These trainings have been shown to be efficacious, offer cost savings, and offer the potential for more efficient and replicable training. Behavior analysts have expertise in crafting effective learning programs making this area ripe for interdisciplinary collaboration. One example of an effective behavior analytic training procedure is Behavioral Skills Training (BST) involving written and verbal instructions, modeling of the skill, rehearsal of the skill, and feedback on the performance. This training, like other trainings in related fields, typically involves extensive in vivo experience in which trainees and trainers are exposed to risk (e.g., bodily harm to trainer, trainee, and client; and errors in teaching performance). Including BST in a virtual reality (VR) context involving virtual experiences in which training experiences are difficult to be recreated or put an individual at risk may be an effective training method and ameliorates challenges. The purpose of the current presentation is to outline and describe how virtual reality is currently being used across industries and within behavior analysis to guide and train a range of individuals. Furthermore, a case example including data on VR training on behavior assessment and intervention will be provided and discussed. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Target Audience: Scientist practitioners |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) Identify novel and effective uses of VR in ABA; (2) Plan for and identify opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration to incorporate virtual reality into their research and practice (3) Describe how skills training can be accomplished via the use of technology including virtual reality |
|
CASEY CLAY (Children's Hospital of Orange County) |
Casey Clay received his PhD at Utah State University in 2015. He was previously a post-doctoral fellow and an assistant professor in the Department of Special Education at the University of Missouri and served as a clinical director at the Thompson Center for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Disabilities. He is currently the Director of Behavior Clinics at Children’s Hospital of Orange County (CHOC) in California. Dr. Clay is a former President of the Four Corners Association for Behavior Analysis. He is an ad hoc reviewer for the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Behavior Modification, Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, and Behavior Analysis in Practice. Dr. Clay’s research interests include assessment and treatment of problem behavior, assessment of non-traditional preferred and competing stimuli, and methods to efficiently and effectively train challenging behavior assessment and intervention practices. Dr. Clay has been involved in the use of fully immersive virtual reality training for assessment and intervention for use in educational and other settings. Dr. Clay is an author of the forthcoming 7th edition of Behavior Analysis and Learning textbook. |
|
|