|
Accelerating Strategy Execution by Orchestrating Leadership Role Modelling and Reinforcement |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
9:00 AM–9:50 AM |
Hyatt Regency, Mineral Hall D-G |
Area: OBM; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Julie Smith, Ph.D. |
Chair: Julie M. Slowiak (University of Minnesota Duluth) |
JULIE SMITH (ChangePartner) |
Julie is a world-class expert in applying behavior science in innovative ways to achieve unprecedented results in organizations. As co-founder of CLG, one of the world's largest behavior-based strategy execution firms, Julie and her colleagues pioneered the most powerful and practical organizational behavior-change approach available today, as evaluated by multiple independent benchmark studies conducted by organizations such as Chevron, the United Nations, and Bayer Corporation. Seeing a great need to improve healthcare provider performance, Julie launched ChangePartner in 2015. She and her team are developing a SMARTe Delivery Excellence enterprise software system, based on Adaptive Behavior Analytics, that will transform healthcare. This technology platform will be like providing a personalized behavioral coach, at a moments notice, to any healthcare worker. Julie is looking forward to the day when the behavioral root causes of poor patient care are drastically reduced–or even eliminated–because of this innovative system. Julie holds a Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis from West Virginia University. She and her husband, Mickey, reside with their family in Fairmont, West Virginia, where they are building Heston Farm, a regional agri-tourism destination that includes the triple threat of a winery, distillery, and brewery. |
Abstract: Senior leaders spend a tremendous amount of time planning and resourcing their strategic initiatives. Yet numerous studies have found that 70% of these strategies fall far short of their goals. Why? Employees have learned to wait out new initiatives to see if their leaders are serious about the change. They look for signs that go far beyond an exciting vision and the provision of ample resources; they want to see day-to-day leadership behaviors that indicate a sustained, personal commitment to the strategy. Through 30 years of consulting to senior leaders, the author has found a winning formula to quickly derive the top leadership behaviors that will accelerate strategy execution at any firm. The key is to find the unique behaviors that will signal a serious commitment to change for this strategy, this leadership team, at this point in time and to get them implemented in a highly visible, coordinated way. Three case studies will be shared: (1) a global airline that improved the customer service delivered by 29,000 flight attendants; (2) a global oil company that improved capital decision making across 12,000 employees, and; (3) a pharmaceutical company that transformed itself into a patient centric, customer focused organization. |
Target Audience: Practitioners in Organizational Behavior Management (OBM), and those who have an interest in OBM, large-scale behavior change, systemic analyses, and sustainable behavior change. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) understand the importance of leaders personally implementing targeted behaviors that demonstrate their commitment to their strategic initiatives; (2) list the steps for identifying targeted leadership behaviors that are unique to an organization; (3) understand how to orchestrate the execution of targeted leadership behaviors to get the maximum impact. |
|
|
|
|
How Much of Apparent Complex Cognition Can a Purely Behavioral Account Explain? |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Hyatt Regency, Centennial Ballroom D |
Area: EAB; Domain: Applied Research |
CE Instructor: Douglas Elliffe, Ph.D. |
Chair: Elizabeth Kyonka (University of New England) |
DOUGLAS ELLIFFE (The University of Auckland), Alex Taylor (The University of Auckland), Brenna Knaebe (The University of Auckland), Russell Gray (The University of Auckland; Institute for the Science of Human History) |
Douglas Elliffe has been at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, as student and staff, since 1979. He recently finished a term as Head of Psychology, and is now Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Science. He has served as Associate Editor of the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior and reviewed for a wide variety of other journals, both behavioral and non-behavioral. He has been a member of the Scientific Advisory Panel for the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining and on the Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour panel for the Royal Society of New Zealand's Marsden Fund, NZ's principal funding body for basic science. His research lab, the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Research Group, won the 2009 Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis international award for Enduring Programmatic Contributions in Behavior Analysis. Doug has supervised or cosupervised over 60 postgraduate research students, often in collaboration with Michael Davison. Doug's main lines of research have been firmly in the tradition of the experimental analysis of behavior, both on quantitative modelling and experimental analyses of choice, and more recently on a reconceptualization of the way in which reinforcement controls behavior. A second line of research, and the topic of this lecture, is offering behavioral/behaviorist accounts of apparent complex cognition in animals, particularly New Caledonian crows. |
Abstract: Lloyd Morgan’s Canon advises that animal behavior should not be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes if it can be fairly interpreted in terms of processes which stand lower in the scale of psychological evolution and development. Leaving aside how we might define ‘higher’ and ‘lower’, this is encouraging to the behaviorist, except that we might say that interpreting human behavior should be subject to the same strictures. But, whether an explanation appealing to the simplest possible processes works is an empirical matter. In this talk I’ll describe three experiments with New Caledonian crows, two published and one not at the time of writing, on putative behavioral innovation in metatool use, putative causal understanding in the Aesop’s Fable task, and putative flexibility of tool manufacture in response to environmental demands. I’ll explore the role of the behaviorist in contributing interpretations and devising control conditions when collaborating with behavioral ecologists, consider how the word fairly in Morgan’s Canon should be interpreted, and discuss how we should be guided by the principle of parsimony in understanding behavior. |
Target Audience: Graduate Students and Researchers in Behavior Analysis |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will be able to: (1) Understand both the value and limitations of Lloyd Morgan’s Canon as a guide to the interpretation of animal behaviour; (2) Understand how we might test explanations of apparently complex behaviour that are based on simple learning principles; (3) Have a greater appreciation of the similarities between animal and human behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
Don Baer Lecture: Autism, ABA, and Health Care Fraud |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 4 |
Area: PRA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Lorri Shealy Unumb, Ph.D. |
Chair: Steven Woolf (Beacon ABA Services) |
LORRI SHEALY UNUMB (Autism Speaks) |
Lorri Shealy Unumb is a lawyer, professor, and the mother of three children: Ryan (15), who has classic autism; Christopher (11); and Jonathan (8), who has Asperger's. In 2005, she wrote ground-breaking autism insurance legislation for South Carolina (Ryan's Law) that passed in 2007 and served as the catalyst for the national movement toward autism insurance reform. Lorri began her work in autism advocacy as a volunteer. In 2008, she was recruited by the New York-based non-profit Autism Speaks, where she now advocates full-time on behalf of individuals with autism. As head of state government affairs, she has testified more than 100 times on health insurance issues in legislatures around the country. |
Abstract: Increased availability of reimbursement options in autism intervention has led to increased scrutiny of the business practices of autism service providers. In particular, providers of Applied Behavior Analysis have been subject to increased scrutiny of their billing practices, which has on several occasions led to federal investigations. This session will equip providers with basic information about the federal government’s tools for investigating and prosecuting health care fraud. |
Target Audience: Practitioners of applied behavior analysis, particularly business owners |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, attendees will be able to: (1) Identify the primary federal law being used to prosecute health care fraud; (2) Understand civil v. criminal liability for health care fraud; (3) Understand individual v. corporate liability for health care fraud. |
|
|
|
|
Supportive Education for Returning Veterans (SERV): An Evidence-Based Curriculum |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Convention Center 401/402 |
Area: TBA; Domain: Service Delivery |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Michael Marks, Ph.D. |
Chair: Gabrielle T. Lee (Michigan State University) |
MICHAEL MARKS (University of Arizona) |
Dr. Marks is currently a Professor of Practice in Psychology and Program Director of the Supportive Education for Returning Veterans at the University of Arizona. Previously, he served as Lead Psychologist at the Southern Arizona VA Health Care System. Dr. Marks was co-founder of Vietnam Veterans of Montana and has received the Disabled Americans Veterans Humanitarian Award. He was selected as the 2012 Outstanding Clinician of the Year by the American Psychological Association's Division 18, VA Section. He is also co-developer of the Supportive Education for Returning Veterans (SERV) program, which is a cohort-based curriculum designed to help veterans transition from military to academic life. The SERV curriculum has been cited by the Veteran's Administration (VAOIG) as a best practice and is part of the VA's "Strong Practices Project." Dr. Marks has been recognized by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations for his distinguished career as an educational leader in the VA and his field. |
Abstract: The Supportive Education for Returning Veterans (SERV) curriculum has been able to retain and graduate ninety percent of the student veterans that complete the courses. The curriculum model includes credit-bearing resiliency orientation to full semester courses. Courses are cohort-based, learner-centered, and use a problem-based learning model that promotes a healthy support system as student veterans navigate their academic career. |
Target Audience: Educators, practitioners, students |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) understand why the SERV curriculum increases the retention and graduation rates among student veterans; (2) understand how the SERV curriculum increases the retention and graduation rates among student veterans; (3) understand the unique qualities that student veterans bring to the classroom. |
|
|
|
|
Sustainability and Student Engagement at Fresno State |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
Hyatt Regency, Mineral Hall D-G |
Area: CSS; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Basic |
CE Instructor: Criss Wilhite, None |
Chair: Angela Sanguinetti (University of California, Davis) |
CRISS WILHITE (Fresno State) |
Criss Wilhite began teaching at Fresno State in 1986. She is a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BACB) with degrees in Psychology, Philosophy and Art, all from Fresno State. With the help and support of the Psychology faculty, she developed the BACB-approved undergraduate Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Program in 1998, the graduate program in ABA in 2005, and the Interdisciplinary ABA program in 2008. These programs, and the faculty hired to develop and direct them, have resulted in the Positive Parenting Program, The Autism Center at Fresno State, Focused Services, and Social Connections. Criss is former director of the undergraduate ABA program, the Positive Parenting Program and the IABA Program. She was Chair of the Archival Committee for the B. F. Skinner Foundation from 2007 to 2010 and has been an advisor to the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies since 2007. She received the Fresno State Psi Chi Instructor of the Year award 10 times. |
Abstract: Since 2009, behavior analysts around the world have, at an increasing rate, applied our science to the problem of sustainability. This work includes the efforts of the Fresno State Sustainability Project, an interdisciplinary attempt to coordinate all such activity on campus. We have had a number of positive outcomes, including the newly-formed Institute of Water and Sustainability. The focus of this talk is student activity that has grown out of the Project. Over the past four years, more than 400 students have had experiences in academic, research, and applied activities related to sustainability. One of these endeavors is the Fresno State Sustainability Club which has hosted four Earth Days, set up multiple talks by experts at Green Bag Lunches, coordinated with other campus clubs, and planted a water-wise garden and hundreds of trees in collaboration with Plant Operations. The College of Science and Math has offered the First Year Experience the past two years, in which freshman in the College take multiple sustainability courses in both basic science and applications. Graduate students do everything from building tiny houses to collecting data on practices. The Psychology and the Environment course has just been reestablished and the development of a minor is underway. Students lives have been substantially changed. The future generation is on its way to making a major positive impact on the health and welfare of the planet. |
Target Audience: Academic behavior analysts and graduate students |
Learning Objectives: 1) Attendees will see examples for funding sustainability work within an academic institution2) Attendees will see examples of applied behavior analytic work on sustainability issues3) Attendees will learn about coursework to support the next generation of behavior analysts who will address sustainability issues in their work |
|
|
|
|
Behavioral Ephemera |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
Hyatt Regency, Centennial Ballroom D |
Area: EAB; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: William M. Baum, Ph.D. |
Chair: Eric S. Murphy (University of Alaska Anchorage) |
WILLIAM M. BAUM (University of California, Davis) |
Dr. Baum received his BA in psychology from Harvard College in 1961. Originally a biology major, he switched to psychology after taking courses from B. F. Skinner and R. J. Herrnstein in his freshman and sophomore years. He attended Harvard University for graduate study in 1962, where he was supervised by Herrnstein and received his Ph.D. in 1966. He spent the year 1965–66 at Cambridge University, studying ethology at the Sub-Department of Animal Behavior. From 1966 to 1975, he held appointments as post-doctoral fellow, research associate, and assistant professor at Harvard University. He spent two years at the National Institutes of Health Laboratory for Brain, Evolution, and Behavior and then accepted an appointment in psychology at the University of New Hampshire in 1977. He retired from there in 1999. He currently has an appointment as associate researcher at the University of California, Davis and lives in San Francisco. His research concerns choice, molar behavior/environment relations, foraging, cultural evolution, and behaviorism. He is the author of a book, Understanding Behaviorism: Behavior, Culture, and Evolution. |
Abstract: Every species possesses abilities for successfully interacting with its environment. These result from phylogeny. In the laboratory, one may arrange artificial conditions that thwart an organisms abilities. The result may be a phenomenon. With sufficient training, however, the phenomenon may prove to be ephemeral, as the organisms basic abilities reassert themselves. A common ability among animal species is the ability to respond to differences and non-differences in rate of obtaining food. This ability may be thwarted in a variety of ways, but the results tend to be ephemeral. A clear example appears in an experiment that pitted pigeons preference for unimpeded responding against their ability to respond to food rate. In a concurrent-chains procedure, the terminal links were identical variable-interval schedules, but in one terminal link, every response produced a timeout. The duration of the timeout varied, and preference varied with it, but the relation vanished with training, in keeping with the equality of food rate across the two terminal links. Some other examples of phenomena that tend to disappear with sufficient training are behavioral contrast, conditioned reinforcement, and resistance to extinction. These appear to be behavioral ephemera. |
Target Audience: Graduate Students and Researchers in Behavior Analysis |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) state how a species' evolutionary environment determines the problems its members are likely to solve; (2) state the difference between behavioral ephemera and stable behavioral phenomena. |
|
|
|
|
Creating Recommended Practice Guidelines for Applied Behavior Analytic Service Delivery |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 1 |
Area: AUT; Domain: Service Delivery |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Linda A. LeBlanc, Ph.D. |
Chair: Jessica L. Thomason-Sassi (New England Center for Children) |
LINDA A. LEBLANC (LeBlanc Behavioral Consulting LLC) |
Linda A. LeBlanc, Ph.D., BCBA-D, Licensed Psychologist, is the President of LeBlanc Behavioral Consulting. She previously served as a professor at Claremont MeKenna College, Western Michigan University, and Auburn University, and as the Executive Director of Trumpet Behavioral Health. She has published over 100 articles and book chapters on topics such as behavioral treatment of autism, technology-based behavioral interventions, behavioral gerontology, and system development in human services. Dr. LeBlanc is an Associate Editor for Behavior Analysis in Practice and the Literature Review Editor for Education and Treatment of Children. She has previously served as an Associate Editor for The Analysis of Verbal Behavior and the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. She is the 2016 recipient of the American Psychological Association Nathan H. Azrin Award for Distinguished Contribution in Applied Behavior Analysis. |
Abstract: Practice guidelines synthesize the published literature on a particular area of applied practice. Practice guidelines may also include specific recommendations for use of strategies and models to guide clinical decision-making. Agencies that provide applied behavior analytic (ABA) services can use practice guidelines to standardize their clinical services in pursuit of enhanced quality. This presentation presents a model for how to create recommended practice guidelines. The model includes a structured approach to literature synthesis, creation of tools and templates that facilitate implementation of best practices, and incorporation of feedback on utility to the practicing behavior analyst. This presentation focuses on the organizational systems that must be developed in order to develop and implement recommended practice guidelines at large scale. In addition, the presentation will include two examples of published practice guidelines that have been developed using the model. The first example focuses on recommended practices for selecting measures for problem behavior. The second example focuses on recommended practices for individual supervision for aspiring behavior analysts. |
Target Audience: Practicing behavior analysts |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) identify the steps in the process for creating recommended practice guidelines; (2) identify the conditions that suggest the need for a specific decision-making tool to facilitate implementation of the recommended practices; (3) identify measures of problem behavior based on the topography of the behavior and the situational constraints of the environment. |
|
|
|
|
Why Behavioral Scientists Can and Should Be Involved in Federally Funded Research |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Hyatt Regency, Centennial Ballroom D |
Area: SCI; Domain: Basic Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Donald A. Hantula, Ph.D. |
Chair: M. Christopher Newland (Auburn University) |
DONALD A. HANTULA (Temple University) |
Donald Hantula (Ph.D., University of Notre Dame) is Associate Professor of Psychology and Director of the Decision Laboratory at Temple University, Associate Editor of the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management and Editor of The Behavior Analyst. His research includes behavior analysis, behavioral economics, human decision making in dynamic environments and technological applications. He has previously held positions as Visiting Scientist and Program Director for Decision, Risk, and Management Sciences at the National Science Foundation, in Occupational Health Promotion (Johns Hopkins Med School), Human Resource Management (King's College) and Management Information Systems (St. Joseph's University) and visiting scholar at University of Nevada - Reno. His research has appeared in American Psychologist, IEEE Transactions, JABA, JOBM, JAP, OB&HDP and his most recent book is Consumer Behavior Analysis: (A)Rational Approach to Consumer Choice (with Victoria Wells). |
Abstract: Behavioral scientists have much to offer, and much to gain from being involved in federal research funding. The National Science Foundation funds basic and applied research in many areas of interest to behavior analysts. In general, funded research advances theory and has substantial broader impacts beyond the results of the research itself. This presentation reviews the proposal and review process including the criteria of intellectual merit and broader impact, highlights opportunities in Decision, Risk & Management Sciences, and describes three funding mechanisms that may be of special interest: dissertation improvement grants for doctoral students; CAREER grants for early-career behavioral scientists; and research in undergraduate institutions (RUI) grants for faculty at undergraduate colleges and universities.The presentation finishes with suggestions for raising the profile of Behavior Analytic Science in this realm. |
Target Audience: Applied and basic researchers interested in securing NSF funding. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) explain and describe the federal funding process at NSF; (2) identify multiple funding opportunities and mechanisms for behavior analysis research; (3) describe how to promote the science of behavior analysis to federal funding agencies. |
|
|
|
|
A Fictional B. F. Skinner |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
5:00 PM–5:50 PM |
Hyatt Regency, Centennial Ballroom D |
Area: PCH; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Basic |
CE Instructor: Richard Gilbert, Ph.D. |
Chair: Edward K. Morris (University of Kansas) |
RICHARD GILBERT (Independent Scholar) |
Richard Gilbert has had several jobs over a long working life, including high-school teacher and university professor, government scientist and elected politician, journalist and consultant on transportation and urban issues. His main formal qualifications are a fifty-year-old Ph.D. in experimental psychology and long-time registration as a clinical psychologist in Canada's Province of Ontario. He's done no substantive work in psychology for decades. He's spent some of his retirement years revisiting matters that preoccupied him during the 1960s and 1970s through writing a novel, Skinner's Quests. In the 1960s, his research and teaching had focused on behavior analysis, shifting in the 1970s to behavioral pharmacology and work with human subjects. He served on the editorial board of the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior from 1971 to 1976. He ceased being a full-time researcher and teacher in 1976 when he was elected to the first of six terms as a local and regional politician in Toronto. Richard Gilbert has produced fifteen non-fiction books, the latest being the second edition of Transport Revolutions: Moving People and Freight without Oil, written with political scientist Anthony Perl. He's produced several hundred articles on a wide range of topics, some published in academic journals, more in professional and popular publications. |
Abstract: Skinner's Quests describes a fictional odyssey by a young B. F. Skinner to England in 1939. His two quests were prompted by philosopher Bertrand Russell and involved Russell's protégé Ludwig Wittgenstein. The intellectual quest was to redirect Wittgenstein's changing analysis of language toward something Russell would find palatable. The political quest—undertaken for the White House —was to provide insights about the behavior of Adolf Hitler, who had been at high school with Wittgenstein. Skinner went chiefly to meet Sigmund Freud, near death in London after moving from Vienna in 1938. He had cited Freud often, with more admiration than agreement. Skinner met several other characters of historical importance, including Alan Turing. He also had numerous encounters with entirely fictional characters. Some were romantic. Some were merely social. Some had a sinister edge that reflected the time of his travels, one of modern history's most fraught periods. I'll describe the novel's provenance and possible achievements, and set out some of the behavioral issues examined in the novel. These mostly concern verbal behavior and are often presented within an evolutionary framework. I'll show how the backdrop of Europe's unsettling politics of the time was used to enrich the discussions of behavioral issues. |
Target Audience: Behavior analysts interested in the history of behavior analysis, its conceptual foundations, and the B. F. Skinner biography. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe factual and counter-factual history; (2) describe the history of behavior analysis relevant to Skinner's contributions; (3) describe Skinner's relationship with Freud and with Wittgenstein; (4) describe Skinner's biography circa 1939. |
|
|
|
|
A Nonsocial Reinforcement Hypothesis of Autism Spectrum Disorderand its Implication for the Acquisition of Verbal and Social Behaviors |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
5:00 PM–5:50 PM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 1 |
Area: VBC; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Einar T. Ingvarsson, Ph.D. |
Chair: Einar T. Ingvarsson (University of North Texas) |
SVEIN EIKESETH (Oslo and Akershus University College) |
Svein Eikeseth, Ph.D., is a professor of psychology at the Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences. Dr. Eikeseth has a Ph.D. from the University of Kansas and has been a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Dr. Eikeseth is the director of several major international research projects, and has made important contributions to the study of autism and to the field of behavior analysis. Eikeseth has published numerous scientific articles, book chapters, and books. He is a consultant for the Associanzione Pianeta Autismo, Rome, Italia, research and clinical director the UK Young Autism Project, Director for Banyan Center, Stockholm, Sweden, and a consultant for the Institute of Child Development, Gdansk, Poland. |
Abstract: Children with ASD and typically developing children were given a choice of responding to view social images or responding to view nonsocial images. Results showed that children with ASD responded significantly more to view the nonsocial images as compared to the typically developing children. This demonstrates that the nonsocial stimuli are more potent reinforcers for the behavior of children with ASD, as compared to typically developing children. The Nonsocial Reinforcement Hypothesis of ASD asserts that infants develop ASD because they have a strong affinity for nonsocial reinforcers. When nonsocial stimuli are more rereinforcing than social stimuli, the environment selects and shapes varies forms of stereotyped and repetitive behavior rather than verbal and social behaviors. Indeed, verbal operants such as tacts and intraverbals are shaped and maintained by social reinforcement, and are often missing or delayed in children with ASD. Echoic behavior, which is more often seen in children with autism, do not require the same type of social reinforcement since copying a stimulus may be reinforcing in itself. The affinity for nonsocial reinforcers may have negative effects on the establishment of a variety of social stimuli as conditioned reinforcers, which further hampers the development of communication, social skills and social interests. |
Target Audience: Professional behavior analysts who are BCBA-certified, applied researchers |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) state how children with ASD tend to respond to nonsocial as opposed to social reinforcers; (2) state how children with ASD differ from typically developing children with respect to social versus nonsocial reinforcement; (3) describe the implications of preference for nonsocial reinforcement for the acquisition of verbal and social behavior. |
|
|
|
|
Skinner on Averaging: Was He Right? Should We Keep the Faith? |
Sunday, May 28, 2017 |
6:00 PM–6:50 PM |
Hyatt Regency, Centennial Ballroom D |
Area: PCH; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Advanced |
CE Instructor: Neville Morris Blampied, Ph.D. |
Chair: Darlene E. Crone-Todd (Salem State University) |
NEVILLE MORRIS BLAMPIED (University of Canterbury) |
Neville M. Blampied graduated from the University of Auckland in 1970. That year he moved to a faculty position in the Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch. In 40+ years at Canterbury he morphed from a physiological psychologist to a behavioural pharmacologist to an experimental behaviour analyst and then (finally) to an applied behaviour analyst. His major research area for the past 20 years has been in applied family psychology, notably pediatric sleep disturbances. Recently he has become concerned with methodological issues in research and with attempting to position single-case research as an alternative to the increasingly discredited null-hypothesis significance testing tradition in Psychology. In December 2012 he completed a 7-year stint as Head of Department and member of the Executive of the College of Science. He also served six years as Director of Scientific Affairs for the New Zealand Psychological Society (2004–2010), two years as National President of the Association of University Staff (2000–2001), three years on the Board of the NZ Universities Academic Audit Unit (2001–2003), and was President, Division 6 of the International Association of Applied Psychology 2010–2014. |
Abstract: In his magnum opus, The Behavior of Organisms (Skinner, 1938) Skinner presented an experimental analysis of behavior that eschewed averaging data across subjects. Even at the time, this stance was unusual, and since then has become even more so. Since the 1950's more than 80% of published quantitative empirical research in Psychology has used group mean data analysed by null-hypothesis statistical tests (NHST). Recently in behavior analysis there have been recurrent calls for the more widespread use of averaging (and NHST) and claims that this would make behavior analysis more acceptable to mainstream psychology. So, was Skinner right, or should we resort to conventional data analytic practices? This paper will review the recent calls for change within behavior analysis about averaging. Then it will consider some developments in fields outside of behavior analysis that bear on the question. It will consider implications from biology and natural selection. It will also consider growing criticisms of group averaging from within mainstream psychology, especially from personality research. Finally it will consider the implications of fundamental measurement theory concerned with ergodicity. The conclusion - Skinner was right, and behavior analysis should keep faith with his rejection of group averaging. |
Target Audience: Basic and applied researchers and methodologists in behavior analysis and those concerned with the behavior of scientists |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe typical data analysis techniques in behavior analysis; (2) describe typical data analysis techniques in the psychological sciences; (3) describe compare and contrast the typical data analysis techniques in behavior analysis and the psychological sciences; (4) describe the contexts in which the typical data analysis techniques in behavior analysis and the psychological sciences are appropriate and inappropriate. |
|
|