|
The National Implementation and Evaluation of Parent Training in Norway |
Monday, May 29, 2017 |
8:00 AM–8:50 AM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 4 |
Area: DEV; Domain: Applied Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Sigmund Eldevik, Ph.D. |
Chair: Sigmund Eldevik (Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences) |
TERJE OGDEN (Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development) |
Terje Ogden, Ph.D., is research director at the Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development in Oslo, a position he has held since 2003. He is also a professor at the Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo. He is the author of more than one hundred scientific publications, and has written several books and book chapters on the development of child conduct problems, and on the effectiveness and implementation of preventive and therapeutic interventions. He is trained as an educational psychologist and has a Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Bergen on the topic of family-based treatment of serious behavior problems in children and youth. Most of his research centers on the development, evaluation and large scale implementation of interventions targeting children with antisocial and co-occurring problems. The evidence-based interventions aim to strengthen child and family relations, improve parenting skills in order to reduce family conflicts and coercion, promote inclusion and prevent placement out of home. Ogden has also contributed to the efforts of adapting programs to the needs of various groups of children and their families. Ogden is also the project leader of a longitudinal prospective study of the normative behavioral and social development of 1200 Norwegian children from 6 months to school age. |
Abstract: A Norwegian national implementation strategy aimed to test and conduct a large-scale implementation of The Oregon model of Parent Management Training (PMTO) based on Gerald Patterson's Social Interaction and Learning theory. The program targets children with antisocial behavior and co-occurring problems and their families. A randomized trial demonstrated the effectiveness of the program, and identified central moderators, mediators and predictors. Fidelity to the PMTO model was found to predict child behavioral outcomes better than parent-reported treatment alliance. Several parents seemed to manage with shorter interventions, and the "Early Interventions for Children at Risk" program was designed for implementation in the municipalities. In line with findings from a study of the normative development of aggression, this adapted program targets children from the age of 3 years on. In sum, findings confirmed that PMTO principles and components could be successfully transported from US to real-world settings in Norway with sustained positive outcomes and maintenance of competent adherence. PMTO has been tested with positive outcomes in both individual and group trainings and in high and low dosages of treatment. The Norwegian project may serve as an inspiration for the testing and scaling up of evidence-based parenting programs in other countries, particularly in Europe. |
Target Audience: Professionals interested in the effectiveness, implementation, and scaling up of parenting interventions for families with children with antisocial behaviour and co-occurring problem. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe the principles and components of a parenting intervention targeting antisocial behavior in children and the process of crossing national and language borders; (2) discuss how these interventions may be implemented and adapted through children's services in order to accommodate the needs of children and families with different characteristics and needs; (3) describe the process of scaling up program delivery with sustainability through continuous training of practitioners and quality assurance to maintain program fidelity. |
|
|
|
|
The Social and Cognitive Foundations of Language Acquisition |
Monday, May 29, 2017 |
10:00 AM–10:50 AM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 4 |
Area: VBC; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Judah B. Axe, Ph.D. |
Chair: Judah B. Axe (Simmons College) |
PAUL IBBOTSON (The Open University) |
Paul Ibbotson studied geology for three years and then linguistics for a further year. After several more unwise and eccentric decisions he gained his Ph.D. in developmental psychology from the Max Planck Child Study Centre at the University of Manchester, UK. He currently works at The Open University teaching and researching psychology. |
Abstract: Usage-based theories see language as a complex adaptive system: the interaction between history the processes that shape how languages are passed from one generation to the next and human psychology the set of unique social and cognitive capacities that allow generations to learn a language in the first place. I will argue that findings from language acquisition research, typology, and psycholinguistics are converging on the idea that language is fundamentally built out of use and generalizations over those usage events. Interestingly, none of the fundamental mechanisms of the usage-based approach are required to be a language-specific adaptation. Language shows creativity, categories, and recursion because people think creatively, categorically, and recursively. I will discuss a range of experimental, corpus and observational work showing that understanding the developmental of language acquisition can benefit from integrating the developmental of non-linguistic faculties, such as executive control, categorization and social-reasoning. |
Target Audience: Researchers and practitioners interested in theories of language |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, attendees will be able to: (1) describe some of the fundamental theoretical issues in language acquisition research; (2) exemplify the cognitive linguistics approach to studying language development; (3) evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. |
|
|
|
|
Disruption and the Impact of Creating a New Future and New Opportunities |
Monday, May 29, 2017 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
Hyatt Regency, Mineral Hall D-G |
Area: CSS; Domain: Service Delivery |
CE Instructor: Todd A. Ward, Ph.D. |
Chair: Todd A. Ward (bSci21 Media, LLC) |
AMY COSPER (RadicalUpstarts) |
Amy Cosper is the former Editor in Chief of Entrepreneur magazine and the CEO of RadicalUpstarts. She has been reporting and commenting on the world of entrepreneurship for 12 years. Cosper is an evangelist for innovation and disruption around the globe. She is keenly aware of the power of entrepreneurship on a cultural and economic level. Her mission is to spread the word and promise of these philosophies on a global scale and to make an impact by teaching these ideas. Cosper is currently working on a book and a documentary that explore the deep economic and cultural impact heralded by the global entrepreneurship movement. She is an award-winning editor and writer and strongly adheres to the idea that "on the other side of your fear, is your success." And she would know, since she rides a Ducati and only does sports that require a helmet. |
Abstract: Disruption is the act of changing cultural practices, and introducing new practices, that involve a greater emphasis on social responsibility and sustainability. I will discuss several facets of disruption as it pertains to entrepreneurship. First, I will provide an overview of disruption itself and why it matters, along with case studies from the entrepreneurial world. Secondly, I will address what many consider to be the primary obstacle to disruption, and to entrepreneurship, which is failure, or more precisely, the fear of failure, and strategies that others have used in the past to remove failure as an obstacle to success. I will also discuss how disruption can take place anywhere, and in any industry, toward the improvement of the human condition. Lastly, I will discuss characteristics that comprise the disruptive leader, along with common challenges such leaders face and the outcomes to which they strive. |
Target Audience: Professionals, academics, and graduate students. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) identify two characteristics of a disruptive leader; (2) define disruption in terms of the classes of behavior it produces; (3) identify two strategies to make it more likely your behavior, as a disruptive leader, will persist despite fearful reactions. |
|
|
|
|
Toward a Behavioral Analysis of B. F. Skinner's Philosophical Discourse |
Monday, May 29, 2017 |
11:00 AM–11:50 AM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 4 |
Area: PCH; Domain: Theory |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: William M. Baum, Ph.D. |
Chair: William M. Baum (University of California, Davis) |
MICHAEL T. GHISELIN (California Academy of Sciences) |
Michael Ghiselin was born in Salt Lake City on May 13, 1939. His doctoral dissertation at Stanford University dealt with the evolution of sea-slugs based on a functional analysis of the reproductive system. That research got him interested in various aspects of the philosophy of biology, especially the theory of classification. His first book, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, was based on a conceptual analysis of Darwin's publications. Published in 1969, it was awarded the Pfizer Prize of the History of Science Society. He is author of The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex (1974) and Metaphysics and the Origin of Species (1997). Recent research projects include studies on the evolution of chemical defense and of the senses of taste and smell in marine animals. |
Abstract: Scientific research can be studied as investigative behavior. That involves inventing problems as well as solving them. It also involves finding better ways to do one's work. That activity has sometimes been called philosophy. Skinner himself said that behaviorism is a philosophy. I would add that the philosophy was part of a scientific research program. Skinner complained that his critics failed to understand his position, which was based on a hard analogy (not a metaphor) between the processes of learning and evolution by natural selection. Right thinking in the one provides clues to right thinking in the other. The advantage of getting rid of teleology in both is fairly straight-forward. Skinner paid less attention to the importance of getting rid of typological (essentialist) thinking about species and other groups of organisms. These have been treated as if they were abstract classes with essences rather than as concrete wholes. Variation has been screened out and persons have been treated as tokens of stereotypes. One result has been a misguided search for universals of human behavior. |
Target Audience: Behavior analysts interested in the historical and conceptual foundations of B. F. Skinner's behaviorism, the relations between the behavioral and biological sciences, and analyses of the behavior of scientists. |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, participants will be able to: (1) describe the conceptual foundations of B. F. Skinner's behaviorism; (2) describe relations between behavior analysis and evolutionary biology; (3) describe the basis of the behavior of behavior-analytic scientists. |
|
|
|
|
Cannabis Dose-Effects Across Routes of Administration: Subjective, Performance, and Pharmacokinetic Differences |
Monday, May 29, 2017 |
3:00 PM–3:50 PM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 4 |
Area: SCI; Domain: Basic Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Christine E. Hughes, Ph.D. |
Chair: Christine E. Hughes (University of North Carolina Wilmington) |
RYAN VANDREY (Johns Hopkins University) |
Dr. Vandrey is an experimental psychologist with degrees from the University of Delaware (BA) and University of Vermont (Ph.D.). He is currently an Associate Professor at the Johns Hopkins University Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit (BPRU). Dr. Vandrey's research focuses on the behavioral pharmacology of cannabis (marijuana) with a primary focus of controlled laboratory studies with adult research volunteers, but also includes clinical trials, web-based survey research, and natural history studies with patient populations using cannabis/cannabinoids for therapeutic purposes. His work helped characterize the cannabis withdrawal syndrome, has provided novel data about the comparative pharmacokinetics and corresponding pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids across routes of administration, explored medications that are potential adjuncts to behavior therapy to improve rates of abstinence among individuals trying to quit using cannabis, examined the effects of cannabis on sleep, and provides information about the risks and benefits of medicinal use of cannabis/cannabinoids for various health conditions. |
Abstract: The use of cannabis (marijuana) for medical and non-medical purposes is expanding worldwide and now includes legal retail outlets for purchasing cannabis products in many areas. Retail cannabis products are varied with respect to dose and intended route of administration, yet the preponderance of scientific data is limited to analysis of the effects of smoked cannabis. This presentation will summarize data from a series of controlled human laboratory studies evaluating the dose effects of oral, smoked, and vaporized cannabis in healthy, non-tolerant individuals. Outcome measures to be described include subjective ratings of drug effects, cardiovascular measures, cannabinoid quantitation in biological fluid, and performance on psychomotor, memory, and divided attention tasks. Implications of the study findings will be discussed with respect to regulation of medical and non-medical cannabis products, drug testing, and education. |
Target Audience: Masters and Doctoral Level BCBAs |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, attendees will be able to: (1) Understand how route of administration alters the time course of cannabis effects; (2) Be able to describe adverse effects of cannabis that can occur at high doses; (3) Understand the relation between blood THC levels and behavioral effects. |
|
|
|
|
Cannabis Use Disorder: Determining Mechanisms and Developing Interventions |
Monday, May 29, 2017 |
4:00 PM–4:50 PM |
Convention Center Four Seasons Ballroom 4 |
Area: BPN; Domain: Basic Research |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
CE Instructor: Joshua Anthony Lile, Ph.D. |
Chair: Matthew W. Johnson (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) |
JOSHUA ANTHONY LILE (University of Kentucky) |
Joshua Lile is a tenured Associate Professor of Behavioral Science, Psychiatry and Psychology at the University of Kentucky. He earned a Ph.D. in Pharmacology from Wake Forest with Mike Nader. His graduate research focused on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic determinants of the reinforcing effects of stimulants using non-human primate models of drug abuse. He then completed a Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Medical Behavioral Science at the University of Kentucky with Craig Rush and Tom Kelly, where he extended his expertise by studying substance use disorders using human laboratory methods. As a faculty member, Dr. Lile established an independent program of research on cannabis use disorder aimed at identifying non-cannabinoid neurotransmitter systems involved in the abuse-related effects of cannabis and screening potential treatment interventions in cannabis users. During this time, he has also been involved as a co-investigator on several projects to develop interventions for stimulant use disorder, and recently he established and validated functionally equivalent IV cocaine self-administration procedures in humans and rhesus monkeys as a platform for translational research on mechanisms of cocaine reinforcement. Throughout his career, Dr. Lile has also been involved in research on the role of individual differences such as personality, sex and hormones, as well as the environment, on the abuse liability of drugs, and more recently has incorporated neuroimaging and non-invasive brain stimulation methods into his research. These scientific efforts have yielded over 60 original research articles. In addition to these research efforts, Dr. Lile is a member of the University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board, and is an active educator and mentor, particularly through his involvement in the Behavioral Science department's graduate program in Clinical and Translational Science. In 2004 Dr. Lile received the American Psychological Association Division 28 Outstanding Dissertation Award, and in 2012 he received the College on Problems of Drug Dependence Joseph Cochin Young Investigator Award. |
Abstract: The landscape surrounding cannabis use is changing dramatically. Legalized medical and recreational use is spreading, habitual use is growing, perceptions of harm are decreasing and the concentration of THC, the main psychoactive ingredient, is rising; consequently, increased problems associated with cannabis use have been predicted. A better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie cannabis use disorder and effective treatments are therefore needed. This presentation will describe the use of human drug discrimination procedures to determine the neuropharmacological mechanisms of the interoceptive effects of THC and identify targets for treatment. This research has demonstrated that GABA and voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCC) are involved in the response to cannabis in humans. This presentation will then discuss the use of human laboratory drug self-administration procedures, combined with medication maintenance, as a strategy for determining the initial safety, tolerability and efficacy of ligands at these targets as potential treatments. Studies with the GABA reuptake inhibitor tiagabine and the VDCC ligand pregabalin will be described. Lastly, the presentation will include initial results from research that has integrated neuroimaging, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation and acute drug administration techniques to study cannabis-use disorder. |
Target Audience: Behavior analysts interested in cannabis use disorder |
Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the presentation, the participant will be able to: (1) describe the current state of cannabis use in the US and cannabis use disorder; (2) describe the use of human laboratory procedures based on operant psychology principles (i.e., drug discrimination and drug self-administration) to study cannabis and cannabinoid effects; (3) describe the involvement of GABA receptors and voltage-dependent calcium channels in the behavioral effects of cannabis and cannabinoids. |
|
|