Association for Behavior Analysis International

The Association for Behavior Analysis International® (ABAI) is a nonprofit membership organization with the mission to contribute to the well-being of society by developing, enhancing, and supporting the growth and vitality of the science of behavior analysis through research, education, and practice.

Search

51st Annual Convention; Washington DC; 2025

Event Details


Previous Page

 

Paper Session #242
Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and Q Methodology: Measurements of Behavioral History and Its Effect on Choice Behavior
Sunday, May 25, 2025
12:00 PM–12:20 PM
Marriott Marquis, M4 Level, Independence D
Area: VBC
Instruction Level: Intermediate
 
Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and Q Methodology: Measurements of Behavioral History and Its Effect on Choice Behavior
Domain: Basic Research
RITA OLLA (University of Nevada, Reno), Ramona Houmanfar (University of Nevada, Reno), Elisabetta Cherchi (New York University Abu Dhabi), Diane Montgomery (Oklahoma State University)
 
Abstract: Behavioral principles suggest that an individual's interaction history and contextual factors influence choice behavior. This study employed two assessment tools to measure participants' interaction histories in work-related preferences: 1) Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) which provided measurements of immediate relational verbal responses under time pressure, 2) Q Methodology which provided the analysis of verbal responses without time constraints. Two studies, each with 22 participants, followed a two-phase experimental design. Initially, participants completed the IRAP and Q assessments. One week later, they engaged in a simulated data entry task which provided a choice option between human and AI assistance in the context of different accuracy levels. Researchers used the IRAP and Q results with the manipulated accuracy levels to estimate a discrete choice model via panel data analysis. All individuals’ choices across participants were examined. The findings revealed that significant differences in partner accuracy levels influenced choice behavior. Furthermore, specific IRAP and Q Methodology results effectively predicted preferences for human or AI assistance. This research introduces a preliminary methodology for measuring verbally expressed interaction history as predictors of choice preferences. Moreover, it may contribute to the development of models that enhance understanding of human-AI interactions, and decision-making processes in collaborative work environments.
 
 

BACK TO THE TOP

 

Back to Top
ValidatorError
  
Modifed by Eddie Soh
DONATE
{"isActive":false}