|
Enhancing Education, Training, and Research Engagement for Staff and Students in the Field of Applied Behavior Analysis |
Monday, May 26, 2025 |
12:00 PM–12:50 PM |
Convention Center, Street Level, 145 B |
Area: EDC; Domain: Applied Research |
Chair: Alyssa Jean Clark (Endicott College ) |
CE Instructor: Alyssa Jean Clark, M.S. |
Abstract: Behavior analysts play a critical role in education, training, and research, with their work often extending beyond the clinical setting to influence the broader professional landscape. Despite the growing focus on effective training methods and engagement in research, there remains a need to better understand how different instructional approaches impact learning outcomes, the efficacy of online training platforms, and the barriers that prevent practitioners from engaging in research. This symposium will present findings from three studies that address these important areas. The first presentation will explore the comparative effects of interteaching and discussion forums on student performance in a master’s level applied behavior analysis course. Using an alternating treatments design, the study found that interteaching resulted in significantly higher quiz scores than discussion forums, demonstrating the potential of interactive pedagogical methods in enhancing student learning outcomes. The second presentation will focus on the effectiveness of asynchronous online training for Registered Behavior Technicians® (RBT®s). This study evaluated whether online training could effectively prepare behavior technicians in the measurement competencies required by the RBT task list. The results indicate that most participants successfully mastered the tasks after initial training, with supplemental modules proving effective for those who did not immediately pass. These findings suggest that online training platforms may be a practical and efficient solution for training behavior technicians. The final presentation will discuss the barriers preventing behavior analysts from engaging in research. This study replicated a previous survey and found that while the majority of behavior analysts are interested in conducting and disseminating research, factors such as time constraints, lack of knowledge, and limited opportunities are significant obstacles. The organization featured in the study developed a plan to support research engagement by creating research communities and mentorship opportunities, and preliminary findings show increased research productivity. This symposium will provide evidence-based recommendations for improving training methods, enhancing online learning for behavior technicians, and increasing research participation among behavior analysts, with implications for the continued advancement of the field. |
Instruction Level: Intermediate |
Target Audience: The target audience for this symposium includes practicing behavior analysts, professors, and students currently pursuing degrees in behavior analysis. This diverse group combines practical experience, academic expertise, and emerging knowledge, fostering a collaborative environment to explore advancements in training and research within the field. Practitioners will gain insights into innovative instructional methods and effective online training platforms to apply in clinical and educational settings, while professors can examine new pedagogical strategies to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Students will deepen their understanding of the critical skills necessary for clinical competency and research engagement. Collectively, attendees will leave equipped with evidence-based strategies to elevate educational practices, research productivity, and professional growth. |
Learning Objectives: 1. Analyze the impact of different instructional approaches, specifically interteaching and discussion forums, on student learning outcomes in graduate-level behavior analysis courses. 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of asynchronous online training platforms for Registered Behavior Technicians® (RBT®s) in developing core measurement skills, including the role of supplemental training modules in supporting mastery. 3. Identify common barriers to research engagement among behavior analysts and examine strategies, such as mentorship and research communities, designed to promote increased research involvement and productivity in the field. |
|
The Effects of an Online Asynchronous Training on the Measurement Section of the Registered Behavior Technician (RBT®) Competency Assessment |
CHANTE GLICK (University of Washington), Kristin N. Foley (Endicott College), Mary Jane Weiss (Endicott College) |
Abstract: There are currently approximately 180,000 Registered Behavior Technicians® (RBT®s) (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, n.d.) To become an RBT, one must complete 40 hours of training and pass a competency assessment and an exam. The initial training is frequently conducted though asynchronous online platforms. There has been little research on the effects of the initial training for RBTs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of asynchronous online instruction on a portion of the RBT Competency Assessment – specifically, the effects of training on the measurement section of the task list on the measurement competencies (continuous measurement, discontinuous measurement, and data and graphs). The training utilized computer-based instruction including video modeling, behavioral observation and ratings (having the participant view another person implementing the task and rating the accuracy of the implementation), and active student responding. The training was administered through a learning management system. The initial training resulted in most participants passing most of the tasks. When a task was not passed immediately upon the completion of the initial training, one supplemental module consisting of one additional video model and one additional behavioral observation and rating activity resulted in passing the competency. These results suggest that online asynchronous training may be effective for the initial training of behavior technicians. Implications and future research directions will be discussed. |
|
Comparing Interteaching and Discussion Forums in an Asynchronous Online Classroom |
SACHA KG SHAW (The University of Southern Maine), Jennifer Posey (Endicott College), Thomas L. Zane (University of Kansas), Mary Jane Weiss (Endicott College) |
Abstract: The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on student performance in a master’s level course using an alternating treatments design. Participants scored higher on quizzes in the interteaching condition (M = 96.75) compared to the discussion forum (M = 75.95). No differences were observed in other assignment across conditions. Interobserver agreement for short answer quiz questions was 91.66% (range: 75%–100%) in the interteaching condition and 100% in the discussion forum condition. Interobserver agreement for annotation scores was 94.44% (range: 83.33% –100%) in the interteaching condition and 98.61% (range: 83.33% – 100%) in the discussion forum condition. A paired sample t-test showed statistically significant differences between the two conditions at p < .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. No significant differences were observed in assignment scores between interteaching (M = 87.28) and discussion forums (M = 89.08). Limitations and future research directions will be discussed. |
|
Identifying Barriers to Research Engagement by Behavior Analysts in an Applied Setting: A Replication of Valentino and Juanico (2020) |
JOSEPH N. RICCIARDI (May Institute), Allison E. Rader (May Institute), Jennifer R. Zarcone (Western New England) |
Abstract: Behavior analysts are trained as scientist-practitioners. However, most do not conduct or disseminate research. To understand why, Valentino & Juanico (2020) surveyed 830 BACB certificants to identify level of interest and barriers to conducting research. We replicated Valentino and Juanico (2020) with behavior analysts in a private organization. We used the same survey method to identifying barriers that might be eliminated to enable research by practitioners. Our results replicated Valentino & Juanico (2020) but with a higher response rate suggesting external validity of original findings. The principal findings were as follows: 49% had conducted research during their careers, 54% considered conducting research important/very important, but 77% no longer did so in their job. The vast majority expressed interest in conducting research, presenting at conferences (79%), publishing their work (84%). This disparity suggests high interest in doing research, but conducting research is impeded. Respondents listed a range of barriers to research on the job: time (52%), knowledge (16%), and research opportunities (16%) (top three reported barriers). In response, the organization developed a plan to increase research engagement by BCBAs, by creating research communities and mentorship options. The action plan, recommendations for other organizations to follow, and preliminary findings showing an increase in research productivity will be presented. |
|
|