To ensure we offer contemporary continuing education opportunities, the CE credit associated with this video is no longer available, however, the video remains available for viewing.
If our ultimate goal is contributing to the wellbeing of humans, we must achieve a behavioral science that is adequate to addressing the many important problems that threaten human wellbeing in the 21st Century. For this reason, we need a more expansive vision of behavior analysis. Skinner’s original vision argued that a science of human behavior could account for and indeed, enable us to influence every aspect of human behavior. However, to an extent, behavior analysts have tended to restrict their attention to theoretical and methodological principles that are clearly derived from behavior analysis. Research and practice that was not clearly labeled as “behavior analytic” has tended to be excluded from the repertoire of behavior analysts. Although behavior analysis has made great contributions in some areas, other areas have had little attention until recently. In this talk I will argue that the stance that would be most in keeping with Skinner’s vision of a science of human behavior that is adequate to addressing every aspect of human behavior, would be one in which behavior analysts embrace any empirical evidence about human behavior that is reliable and replicable, while at the same time focusing on how that evidence contributes to the goal of prediction and influence. Our question should be “Does it work?” not whether it is behavior analytic. This stance would bring into the purview of behavior analysts many areas of behavioral science that ironically would not exist without the seminal contribution of Skinner and other behavior analysts. Among these are clinical interventions, research on relational framing, behavioral medicine, and prevention science.