Strategic Plan | Org. Structure | Newsletters | Code of Ethics | Diversity Policy | Position Statements | FAQs | Terms of Use

ABAI Portal


Use the ABAI Portal to access ABAI's services, including START, the membership directory, and the on-line store.


2006, Summer

Message from the SABA President

2005-2006 SABA Donors

International Development Grant Application

Sidney Bijou Grant Application

EAB Grant Application

Donate to SABA

2006 Fellows of ABA

2007 Fellows Nominations Sought

Recap of ABA 2006 in Atlanta

Upcoming Conferences

Progress & Challenges in the Behavioral Treatment of Autism: An ABA Conference

Organizational Members

Updates from ABA's Boards and Committees

Updates from ABA's Affiliated Chapters

Updates from ABA's Special Interest Groups

News from Behavioral Organizations

Supporting and Sustaining Members

ABA Membership Information

ABA Membership Registration Form

Newsletter

Volume 29 | 2006 | Number 2

Direct Instruction

By Dr. Cathy Watkins

The Direct Instruction Special Interest Group (DI SIG) of the Association for Behavior Analysis is a group of behavior analysts who are interested in the design and delivery of direct instruction programs. Our goal is to promote and disseminate direct instruction within the field of behavior analysis. Understanding the principles of instructional design articulated by Engelmann and Carnine may improve our knowledge of stimulus control, educational programming, and teaching.

About a dozen members attended the DI SIG meeting at the 2005 ABA convention in Chicago. Discussion at the meeting focused on:

There was also discussion and interest concerning Response to Intervention (RtI) models based on DI and applied behavior analysis. The recent reauthorization of Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) calls for a move away from expensive programs with questionable benefits for students with disabilities and a move toward accountability and documented program effectiveness. IDEA 2004 specifies that Local Education Agencies are no longer required to use a discrepancy model, but may use what has come to be called Responsiveness to Intervention (RtI). RtI calls for the use of scientifically-based academic and behavioral interventions. Policy groups empanelled to identify effective interventions have recognized applied behavior analysis and direct instruction as effective approaches, along with the use of direct and continuous performance measures and the use of graphic data display to facilitate data-based decision-making. Clearly, this is a time of great opportunity for DI and behavior analysis. We invite anyone with interest in direct instruction to join the DI SIG.

Back to Previous Page